{"title":"制度理论与制度种族主义:POC企业家面临的商业成功障碍与家族企业优势","authors":"Eric R. Kushins, Myriam Quispe-Agnoli","doi":"10.1108/ijebr-06-2022-0494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Compared to Whites, People of Color (POC) in the USA face substantial cultural, structural and institutional challenges on their paths to entrepreneurial success. Many of these challenges have their roots in institutional racism—pervasive discriminatory practices and policies found within institutions. Institutional theory suggests that organizations gain access to institutions and resources when they conform to “appropriate” business practices. How does the reality of institutional racism square with institutional theory when many of those institutions, like banks, are fundamentally afflicted by racist practices and norms? Can another institution, the family, act as a resource substitute to provide POC business owners the necessary resources for success?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Focusing on White-, Black- and Asian-American business owners, the authors analyze data from the USA. Census's Annual Business Survey.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Despite vast performance differences between POC- and White-owned businesses, family firms of every racial group outperform their same-race nonfamily counterparts. Idiosyncratic resources families bring into family firms, known as familiness, appear to help mitigate the challenges to entrepreneurial success that POC face.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Policy makers should consider specific types of support different entrepreneurs require given the kinds of hurdles racial minorities continue to face in the USA.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>Despite scholarly attention on family firm heterogeneity, there is scant research on race.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research is one of the first to explore the implications of institutional racism on institutional theory and the first to employ this concept within the context of family firms.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51425,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research","volume":"109 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional theory and institutional racism: barriers to business success faced by POC entrepreneurs and the family firm advantage\",\"authors\":\"Eric R. Kushins, Myriam Quispe-Agnoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijebr-06-2022-0494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Compared to Whites, People of Color (POC) in the USA face substantial cultural, structural and institutional challenges on their paths to entrepreneurial success. Many of these challenges have their roots in institutional racism—pervasive discriminatory practices and policies found within institutions. Institutional theory suggests that organizations gain access to institutions and resources when they conform to “appropriate” business practices. How does the reality of institutional racism square with institutional theory when many of those institutions, like banks, are fundamentally afflicted by racist practices and norms? Can another institution, the family, act as a resource substitute to provide POC business owners the necessary resources for success?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Focusing on White-, Black- and Asian-American business owners, the authors analyze data from the USA. Census's Annual Business Survey.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Despite vast performance differences between POC- and White-owned businesses, family firms of every racial group outperform their same-race nonfamily counterparts. Idiosyncratic resources families bring into family firms, known as familiness, appear to help mitigate the challenges to entrepreneurial success that POC face.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>Policy makers should consider specific types of support different entrepreneurs require given the kinds of hurdles racial minorities continue to face in the USA.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\\n<p>Despite scholarly attention on family firm heterogeneity, there is scant research on race.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This research is one of the first to explore the implications of institutional racism on institutional theory and the first to employ this concept within the context of family firms.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":51425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research\",\"volume\":\"109 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-06-2022-0494\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-06-2022-0494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Institutional theory and institutional racism: barriers to business success faced by POC entrepreneurs and the family firm advantage
Purpose
Compared to Whites, People of Color (POC) in the USA face substantial cultural, structural and institutional challenges on their paths to entrepreneurial success. Many of these challenges have their roots in institutional racism—pervasive discriminatory practices and policies found within institutions. Institutional theory suggests that organizations gain access to institutions and resources when they conform to “appropriate” business practices. How does the reality of institutional racism square with institutional theory when many of those institutions, like banks, are fundamentally afflicted by racist practices and norms? Can another institution, the family, act as a resource substitute to provide POC business owners the necessary resources for success?
Design/methodology/approach
Focusing on White-, Black- and Asian-American business owners, the authors analyze data from the USA. Census's Annual Business Survey.
Findings
Despite vast performance differences between POC- and White-owned businesses, family firms of every racial group outperform their same-race nonfamily counterparts. Idiosyncratic resources families bring into family firms, known as familiness, appear to help mitigate the challenges to entrepreneurial success that POC face.
Practical implications
Policy makers should consider specific types of support different entrepreneurs require given the kinds of hurdles racial minorities continue to face in the USA.
Social implications
Despite scholarly attention on family firm heterogeneity, there is scant research on race.
Originality/value
This research is one of the first to explore the implications of institutional racism on institutional theory and the first to employ this concept within the context of family firms.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research (IJEBR) has a unique focus on publishing original research related to the human and social dynamics of entrepreneurship, and entrepreneurial management in small and growing organizations. The journal has an international perspective on entrepreneurship and publishes conceptual papers and empirical studies which bring together issues of interest to academic researchers and educators, policy-makers and practitioners worldwide.The editorial team encourages high-quality submissions which advance the study of human and behavioural dimensions of entrepreneurship and smaller organizations. Examples of topics which illustrate the scope of the journal are provided below. Topicality Nascent entrepreneurship and new venture creation Management development and learning in smaller businesses Enterprise and entrepreneurship education, learning and careers Entrepreneurial psychology and cognition Management and transition in smaller, growing and family-owned enterprises Corporate entrepreneurship and venturing Entrepreneurial teams, management and organizations Social, sustainable and informal entrepreneurship National and international policy, historical and cultural studies in entrepreneurship Gender, minority and ethnic entrepreneurship Innovative research methods and theoretical development in entrepreneurship Resourcing and managing innovation in entrepreneurial ventures.