ASA伦理指南如何支持美国官方统计指南?

Jennifer Park, Rochelle E. Tractenberg
{"title":"ASA伦理指南如何支持美国官方统计指南?","authors":"Jennifer Park, Rochelle E. Tractenberg","doi":"arxiv-2309.07180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2022, the American Statistical Association revised its Ethical Guidelines\nfor Statistical Practice. Originally issued in 1982, these Guidelines describe\nresponsibilities of the 'ethical statistical practitioner' to their profession,\nto their research subjects, as well as to their community of practice. These\nguidelines are intended as a framework to assist decision-making by\nstatisticians working across academic, research, and government environments.\nFor the first time, the 2022 Guidelines describe the ethical obligations of\norganizations and institutions that use statistical practice. This paper\nexamines alignment between the ASA Ethical Guidelines and other\nlong-established normative guidelines for US official statistics: the OMB\nStatistical Policy Directives 1, 2, and 2a NASEM Principles and Practices, and\nthe OMB Data Ethics Tenets. Our analyses ask how the recently updated ASA\nEthical Guidelines can support these guidelines for federal statistics and data\nscience. The analysis uses a form of qualitative content analysis, the\nalignment model, to identify patterns of alignment, and potential for tensions,\nwithin and across guidelines. The paper concludes with recommendations to\npolicy makers when using ethical guidance to establish parameters for policy\nchange and the administrative and technical controls that necessarily follow.","PeriodicalId":501323,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do ASA Ethical Guidelines Support U.S. Guidelines for Official Statistics?\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Park, Rochelle E. Tractenberg\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2309.07180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2022, the American Statistical Association revised its Ethical Guidelines\\nfor Statistical Practice. Originally issued in 1982, these Guidelines describe\\nresponsibilities of the 'ethical statistical practitioner' to their profession,\\nto their research subjects, as well as to their community of practice. These\\nguidelines are intended as a framework to assist decision-making by\\nstatisticians working across academic, research, and government environments.\\nFor the first time, the 2022 Guidelines describe the ethical obligations of\\norganizations and institutions that use statistical practice. This paper\\nexamines alignment between the ASA Ethical Guidelines and other\\nlong-established normative guidelines for US official statistics: the OMB\\nStatistical Policy Directives 1, 2, and 2a NASEM Principles and Practices, and\\nthe OMB Data Ethics Tenets. Our analyses ask how the recently updated ASA\\nEthical Guidelines can support these guidelines for federal statistics and data\\nscience. The analysis uses a form of qualitative content analysis, the\\nalignment model, to identify patterns of alignment, and potential for tensions,\\nwithin and across guidelines. The paper concludes with recommendations to\\npolicy makers when using ethical guidance to establish parameters for policy\\nchange and the administrative and technical controls that necessarily follow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2309.07180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2309.07180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年,美国统计协会修订了其统计实践道德准则。这些准则最初发布于1982年,描述了“道德统计从业者”对其职业、研究对象以及实践社区的责任。这些指南旨在作为一个框架,帮助统计学家在学术、研究和政府环境中工作。《2022年指南》首次描述了使用统计实践的组织和机构的道德义务。本文探讨了ASA道德准则与其他长期建立的美国官方统计规范准则之间的一致性:OMB统计政策指令1、2和2a NASEM原则和实践,以及OMB数据道德原则。我们的分析询问最近更新的ASAEthical Guidelines如何支持这些联邦统计和数据科学指南。分析使用定性内容分析的一种形式,对齐模型,来识别对齐模式,以及指导方针内部和跨指导方针的潜在紧张关系。本文最后对政策制定者在使用道德指导为政策变化和必要的行政和技术控制建立参数时提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How do ASA Ethical Guidelines Support U.S. Guidelines for Official Statistics?
In 2022, the American Statistical Association revised its Ethical Guidelines for Statistical Practice. Originally issued in 1982, these Guidelines describe responsibilities of the 'ethical statistical practitioner' to their profession, to their research subjects, as well as to their community of practice. These guidelines are intended as a framework to assist decision-making by statisticians working across academic, research, and government environments. For the first time, the 2022 Guidelines describe the ethical obligations of organizations and institutions that use statistical practice. This paper examines alignment between the ASA Ethical Guidelines and other long-established normative guidelines for US official statistics: the OMB Statistical Policy Directives 1, 2, and 2a NASEM Principles and Practices, and the OMB Data Ethics Tenets. Our analyses ask how the recently updated ASA Ethical Guidelines can support these guidelines for federal statistics and data science. The analysis uses a form of qualitative content analysis, the alignment model, to identify patterns of alignment, and potential for tensions, within and across guidelines. The paper concludes with recommendations to policy makers when using ethical guidance to establish parameters for policy change and the administrative and technical controls that necessarily follow.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Censored Data Forecasting: Applying Tobit Exponential Smoothing with Time Aggregation How to survive the Squid Games using probability theory Cross-sectional personal network analysis of adult smoking in rural areas Modeling information spread across networks with communities using a multitype branching process framework Asymptotic confidence intervals for the difference and the ratio of the weighted kappa coefficients of two diagnostic tests subject to a paired design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1