{"title":"印度湿润亚热带干湿交替灌溉水稻池水和养分管理的模拟与优化","authors":"Shashank Shekhar, Damodhara Rao Mailapalli, Narendra Singh Raghuwanshi","doi":"10.1007/s10333-023-00961-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation practice requires an appropriate threshold value for which, maximum water savings and minimum water and nutrient loss can be achieved without affecting the grain yield significantly. Determining the appropriate AWD threshold value experimentally is a challenging task. Mathematical models with optimization can be substitute tools for determining appropriate AWD threshold value. In this study, field studies were carried out using the non-weighing lysimeters with three levels of irrigation treatment (no soil water stress: NS, mild soil water stress/400 cm: MS and severe soil water stress/750 cm: SS) along with three levels of nitrogen application rate (high nitrogen: HN/150 kg/ha; medium nitrogen: MN/120 kg N/ha; low nitrogen: LN/60 kg N/ha). Each treatment was replicated three times. The field experimental data were used to determine the crop production function and simulate water flow and nutrient transport with the help of the Hydrus-1D model. Finally, the simulated results were optimized with the help of Design Expert software and appropriate irrigation (ponding water depth, soil matric potential head) and nutrient management (nutrient application rate) practice determined. The simulated results indicate that, the change in ponding water depth, soil matric potential head and nutrient application rates affect the water flow, nutrient transport and grain yield significantly. Overall, the 4.5 cm ponding water depth with the recommended dose of fertilizer (N: P: K-120: 50:60 kg/ha) and soil matric potential head of 400 cm was considered as an appropriate irrigation and nutrient management practice, which resulted a maximum grain yield of 5 t/ha and net profit of approx. Rs.20595.</p>","PeriodicalId":56101,"journal":{"name":"Paddy and Water Environment","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation and optimization of ponding water and nutrient management in rice irrigated with alternate wetting and drying practice under a humid subtropical region in India\",\"authors\":\"Shashank Shekhar, Damodhara Rao Mailapalli, Narendra Singh Raghuwanshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10333-023-00961-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation practice requires an appropriate threshold value for which, maximum water savings and minimum water and nutrient loss can be achieved without affecting the grain yield significantly. Determining the appropriate AWD threshold value experimentally is a challenging task. Mathematical models with optimization can be substitute tools for determining appropriate AWD threshold value. In this study, field studies were carried out using the non-weighing lysimeters with three levels of irrigation treatment (no soil water stress: NS, mild soil water stress/400 cm: MS and severe soil water stress/750 cm: SS) along with three levels of nitrogen application rate (high nitrogen: HN/150 kg/ha; medium nitrogen: MN/120 kg N/ha; low nitrogen: LN/60 kg N/ha). Each treatment was replicated three times. The field experimental data were used to determine the crop production function and simulate water flow and nutrient transport with the help of the Hydrus-1D model. Finally, the simulated results were optimized with the help of Design Expert software and appropriate irrigation (ponding water depth, soil matric potential head) and nutrient management (nutrient application rate) practice determined. The simulated results indicate that, the change in ponding water depth, soil matric potential head and nutrient application rates affect the water flow, nutrient transport and grain yield significantly. Overall, the 4.5 cm ponding water depth with the recommended dose of fertilizer (N: P: K-120: 50:60 kg/ha) and soil matric potential head of 400 cm was considered as an appropriate irrigation and nutrient management practice, which resulted a maximum grain yield of 5 t/ha and net profit of approx. Rs.20595.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paddy and Water Environment\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paddy and Water Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-023-00961-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paddy and Water Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-023-00961-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
干湿交替灌溉(AWD)实践需要一个适当的阈值,在不显著影响粮食产量的情况下实现最大节水和最小水分和养分损失。通过实验确定合适的AWD阈值是一项具有挑战性的任务。优化后的数学模型可以作为确定合适的AWD阈值的替代工具。本研究采用无称重渗渗仪进行田间试验,采用3种不同水平的灌溉处理(无土壤水分胁迫:NS、轻度土壤水分胁迫/400 cm: MS和重度土壤水分胁迫/750 cm: SS)和3种不同水平的施氮量(高氮:HN/150 kg/ha;中氮:MN/120 kg N/ha;低氮:LN/60 kg N/ha)。每个治疗重复三次。利用田间试验数据确定作物生产函数,利用Hydrus-1D模型模拟水分流动和养分输送。最后,利用Design Expert软件对模拟结果进行优化,确定适宜的灌溉(池塘水深、土壤基质电位水头)和养分管理(养分施用量)实践。模拟结果表明,池塘水深、土壤基质势头和养分施用量的变化对水流量、养分转运和粮食产量影响显著。综上所述,适宜的灌溉和养分管理措施为:池水深度为4.5 cm,推荐施肥剂量为(N: P: k: 120: 50:60 kg/ha),土壤基质势头为400 cm,最高产量为5 t/ha,净利润约为5 t/ha。Rs.20595。
Simulation and optimization of ponding water and nutrient management in rice irrigated with alternate wetting and drying practice under a humid subtropical region in India
Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation practice requires an appropriate threshold value for which, maximum water savings and minimum water and nutrient loss can be achieved without affecting the grain yield significantly. Determining the appropriate AWD threshold value experimentally is a challenging task. Mathematical models with optimization can be substitute tools for determining appropriate AWD threshold value. In this study, field studies were carried out using the non-weighing lysimeters with three levels of irrigation treatment (no soil water stress: NS, mild soil water stress/400 cm: MS and severe soil water stress/750 cm: SS) along with three levels of nitrogen application rate (high nitrogen: HN/150 kg/ha; medium nitrogen: MN/120 kg N/ha; low nitrogen: LN/60 kg N/ha). Each treatment was replicated three times. The field experimental data were used to determine the crop production function and simulate water flow and nutrient transport with the help of the Hydrus-1D model. Finally, the simulated results were optimized with the help of Design Expert software and appropriate irrigation (ponding water depth, soil matric potential head) and nutrient management (nutrient application rate) practice determined. The simulated results indicate that, the change in ponding water depth, soil matric potential head and nutrient application rates affect the water flow, nutrient transport and grain yield significantly. Overall, the 4.5 cm ponding water depth with the recommended dose of fertilizer (N: P: K-120: 50:60 kg/ha) and soil matric potential head of 400 cm was considered as an appropriate irrigation and nutrient management practice, which resulted a maximum grain yield of 5 t/ha and net profit of approx. Rs.20595.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Paddy and Water Environment is to advance the science and technology of water and environment related disciplines in paddy-farming. The scope includes the paddy-farming related scientific and technological aspects in agricultural engineering such as irrigation and drainage, soil and water conservation, land and water resources management, irrigation facilities and disaster management, paddy multi-functionality, agricultural policy, regional planning, bioenvironmental systems, and ecological conservation and restoration in paddy farming regions.