延迟和流动性风险

ÁLVARO CARTEA, SEBASTIAN JAIMUNGAL, LEANDRO SÁNCHEZ-BETANCOURT
{"title":"延迟和流动性风险","authors":"ÁLVARO CARTEA, SEBASTIAN JAIMUNGAL, LEANDRO SÁNCHEZ-BETANCOURT","doi":"10.1142/s0219024921500357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Latency (i.e. time delay) in electronic markets affects the efficacy of liquidity taking strategies. During the time liquidity, takers process information and send marketable limit orders (MLOs) to the exchange, the limit order book (LOB) might undergo updates, so there is no guarantee that MLOs are filled. We develop a latency-optimal trading strategy that improves the marksmanship of liquidity takers. The interaction between the LOB and MLOs is modeled as a marked point process. Each MLO specifies a price limit so the order can receive worse prices and quantities than those the liquidity taker targets if the updates in the LOB are against the interest of the trader. In our model, the liquidity taker balances the tradeoff between the costs of missing trades and the costs of walking the book. In particular, we show how to build cost-neutral strategies, that on average, trade price improvements for fewer misses. We employ techniques of variational analysis to obtain the price limit of each MLO the agent sends. The price limit of an MLO is characterized as the solution to a class of forward–backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDEs) driven by random measures. We prove the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the FBSDE and numerically solve it to illustrate the performance of the latency-optimal strategies.","PeriodicalId":47022,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LATENCY AND LIQUIDITY RISK\",\"authors\":\"ÁLVARO CARTEA, SEBASTIAN JAIMUNGAL, LEANDRO SÁNCHEZ-BETANCOURT\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s0219024921500357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Latency (i.e. time delay) in electronic markets affects the efficacy of liquidity taking strategies. During the time liquidity, takers process information and send marketable limit orders (MLOs) to the exchange, the limit order book (LOB) might undergo updates, so there is no guarantee that MLOs are filled. We develop a latency-optimal trading strategy that improves the marksmanship of liquidity takers. The interaction between the LOB and MLOs is modeled as a marked point process. Each MLO specifies a price limit so the order can receive worse prices and quantities than those the liquidity taker targets if the updates in the LOB are against the interest of the trader. In our model, the liquidity taker balances the tradeoff between the costs of missing trades and the costs of walking the book. In particular, we show how to build cost-neutral strategies, that on average, trade price improvements for fewer misses. We employ techniques of variational analysis to obtain the price limit of each MLO the agent sends. The price limit of an MLO is characterized as the solution to a class of forward–backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDEs) driven by random measures. We prove the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the FBSDE and numerically solve it to illustrate the performance of the latency-optimal strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219024921500357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219024921500357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子市场的潜伏期(即时间延迟)影响流动性获取策略的有效性。在流动性期间,交易者处理信息并向交易所发送可售限价单(MLOs),限价单簿(LOB)可能会更新,因此无法保证MLOs被填满。我们开发了一个延迟最优的交易策略,提高了流动性接受者的枪法。将LOB和mlo之间的交互建模为标记点过程。每个MLO指定一个价格限制,因此如果LOB中的更新违背交易者的利益,则订单可以收到比流动性接受者目标更低的价格和数量。在我们的模型中,流动性接受者在错过交易的成本和不履约的成本之间进行平衡。特别是,我们展示了如何构建成本中性策略,即平均而言,以更少的失误来交易价格改善。我们使用变分分析技术来获得代理发送的每个MLO的价格限制。MLO的限价被描述为一类由随机测度驱动的正-倒向随机微分方程的解。我们证明了FBSDE解的存在唯一性,并对其进行了数值求解,以说明延迟最优策略的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LATENCY AND LIQUIDITY RISK
Latency (i.e. time delay) in electronic markets affects the efficacy of liquidity taking strategies. During the time liquidity, takers process information and send marketable limit orders (MLOs) to the exchange, the limit order book (LOB) might undergo updates, so there is no guarantee that MLOs are filled. We develop a latency-optimal trading strategy that improves the marksmanship of liquidity takers. The interaction between the LOB and MLOs is modeled as a marked point process. Each MLO specifies a price limit so the order can receive worse prices and quantities than those the liquidity taker targets if the updates in the LOB are against the interest of the trader. In our model, the liquidity taker balances the tradeoff between the costs of missing trades and the costs of walking the book. In particular, we show how to build cost-neutral strategies, that on average, trade price improvements for fewer misses. We employ techniques of variational analysis to obtain the price limit of each MLO the agent sends. The price limit of an MLO is characterized as the solution to a class of forward–backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDEs) driven by random measures. We prove the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the FBSDE and numerically solve it to illustrate the performance of the latency-optimal strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The shift of the financial market towards the general use of advanced mathematical methods has led to the introduction of state-of-the-art quantitative tools into the world of finance. The International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF) brings together international experts involved in the mathematical modelling of financial instruments as well as the application of these models to global financial markets. The development of complex financial products has led to new challenges to the regulatory bodies. Financial instruments that have been designed to serve the needs of the mature capitals market need to be adapted for application in the emerging markets.
期刊最新文献
Netting and Novation in Repo Networks Pricing Cocos with Equity Conversion Covenant in a Distressed Market Environment The Financial Impact of Carbon Emissions on Power Utilities Under Climate Scenarios A CHANGE OF MEASURE FORMULA FOR RECURSIVE CONDITIONAL EXPECTATIONS KRIGING METHODS FOR MODELING SPATIAL BASIS RISK IN WEATHER INDEX INSURANCES: A TECHNICAL NOTE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1