印度雷达和闪电资料同化对强降雨事件短期预报的影响

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1002/qj.4623
K. B. R. R. Hari Prasad, V. S. Prasad, M. Sateesh, K. Amar Jyothi
{"title":"印度雷达和闪电资料同化对强降雨事件短期预报的影响","authors":"K. B. R. R. Hari Prasad, V. S. Prasad, M. Sateesh, K. Amar Jyothi","doi":"10.1002/qj.4623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accurate prediction of high-impact weather systems using cloud-resolving models is still a challenge among researchers. This study evaluates the consistency of the combination of the three-dimensional variational technique within the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation assimilation system (GSI-3DVAR) and nudging in the same modelling system on short-range forecasts of three heavy rainfall events from the southwest monsoon season of 2021 over the Indian subcontinent. Three experiments have been conducted (i) control (CNTL): assimilated conventional and satellite observations; (ii) radar and lightning data assimilation (RLDA): assimilated radar reflectivity and lightning proxy reflectivity data along with all observations used in CNTL; and (iii) lightning data assimilation (LDA): same as RLDA but without the assimilation of radar data; particularly done to test the impact of assimilation of only lightning data. The model-simulated rainfall is evaluated by using the Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals (IMERG) for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM IMERG) rainfall data. The intercomparison of LDA and RLDA for event 1 highlighted that both represent the convective regions reasonably better than CNTL, but RLDA outperforms LDA and thus further assimilation experiments are done with RLDA. RLDA provided reasonably accurate forecasts compared to CNTL, which is evident in the spatial distribution of rainfall and area-averaged three-hourly accumulated rainfall. Verification metrics for the three selected heavy rainfall events reveal that an optimal forecast performance (especially in the first six hours of free forecast) is obtained by the simulation with assimilation of radar and lightning data during the pre-forecast period, through correcting the position and timing of convective centres. The probability of detection (POD) values are higher for light rainfall categories than for the heavy rain categories. POD values were higher in RLDA than CNTL throughout simulation for all three events. For all these three selected events, fractions skill scores (FSS) of RLDA are always better than CNTL with different neighbourhood sizes for different threshold values throughout the forecast period.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of Indian radar and lightning data assimilation on the short-range forecasts of heavy rainfall events\",\"authors\":\"K. B. R. R. Hari Prasad, V. S. Prasad, M. Sateesh, K. Amar Jyothi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/qj.4623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The accurate prediction of high-impact weather systems using cloud-resolving models is still a challenge among researchers. This study evaluates the consistency of the combination of the three-dimensional variational technique within the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation assimilation system (GSI-3DVAR) and nudging in the same modelling system on short-range forecasts of three heavy rainfall events from the southwest monsoon season of 2021 over the Indian subcontinent. Three experiments have been conducted (i) control (CNTL): assimilated conventional and satellite observations; (ii) radar and lightning data assimilation (RLDA): assimilated radar reflectivity and lightning proxy reflectivity data along with all observations used in CNTL; and (iii) lightning data assimilation (LDA): same as RLDA but without the assimilation of radar data; particularly done to test the impact of assimilation of only lightning data. The model-simulated rainfall is evaluated by using the Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals (IMERG) for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM IMERG) rainfall data. The intercomparison of LDA and RLDA for event 1 highlighted that both represent the convective regions reasonably better than CNTL, but RLDA outperforms LDA and thus further assimilation experiments are done with RLDA. RLDA provided reasonably accurate forecasts compared to CNTL, which is evident in the spatial distribution of rainfall and area-averaged three-hourly accumulated rainfall. Verification metrics for the three selected heavy rainfall events reveal that an optimal forecast performance (especially in the first six hours of free forecast) is obtained by the simulation with assimilation of radar and lightning data during the pre-forecast period, through correcting the position and timing of convective centres. The probability of detection (POD) values are higher for light rainfall categories than for the heavy rain categories. POD values were higher in RLDA than CNTL throughout simulation for all three events. For all these three selected events, fractions skill scores (FSS) of RLDA are always better than CNTL with different neighbourhood sizes for different threshold values throughout the forecast period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4623\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用云分辨模型对高影响天气系统进行准确预测仍然是研究人员面临的一个挑战。本研究评估了网格点统计插值同化系统(GSI-3DVAR)中的三维变分技术与同一建模系统中的微推技术结合对2021年西南季风季节印度次大陆三次强降雨事件的短期预报的一致性。进行了三项试验:(i)控制(CNTL):同化常规和卫星观测;(ii)雷达和闪电资料同化(RLDA):同化的雷达反射率和闪电替代反射率资料以及CNTL使用的所有观测资料;(iii)闪电数据同化(LDA):与RLDA相同,但不同化雷达数据;特别是为了测试闪电数据同化的影响。利用全球降水测量(GPM IMERG)降水数据的多卫星综合反演(IMERG)对模式模拟的降雨进行了评价。LDA和RLDA对事件1的对比表明,两者对对流区域的表现都比CNTL好,但RLDA的表现优于LDA,因此可以利用RLDA进行进一步的同化实验。与CNTL相比,RLDA提供了相当准确的预报,这在降雨量和面积平均3小时累积降雨量的空间分布上是明显的。对三个选定的强降雨事件的验证指标表明,通过校正对流中心的位置和时间,在预报前同化雷达和闪电资料进行模拟,获得了最佳的预报性能(特别是在免费预报的前6小时)。小雨类别的探测概率(POD)值高于暴雨类别。在所有三个事件的模拟过程中,RLDA的POD值都高于CNTL。在整个预测期内,对于不同阈值,RLDA的分数技能分数(FSS)总是优于不同邻域大小的CNTL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of Indian radar and lightning data assimilation on the short-range forecasts of heavy rainfall events
The accurate prediction of high-impact weather systems using cloud-resolving models is still a challenge among researchers. This study evaluates the consistency of the combination of the three-dimensional variational technique within the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation assimilation system (GSI-3DVAR) and nudging in the same modelling system on short-range forecasts of three heavy rainfall events from the southwest monsoon season of 2021 over the Indian subcontinent. Three experiments have been conducted (i) control (CNTL): assimilated conventional and satellite observations; (ii) radar and lightning data assimilation (RLDA): assimilated radar reflectivity and lightning proxy reflectivity data along with all observations used in CNTL; and (iii) lightning data assimilation (LDA): same as RLDA but without the assimilation of radar data; particularly done to test the impact of assimilation of only lightning data. The model-simulated rainfall is evaluated by using the Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals (IMERG) for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM IMERG) rainfall data. The intercomparison of LDA and RLDA for event 1 highlighted that both represent the convective regions reasonably better than CNTL, but RLDA outperforms LDA and thus further assimilation experiments are done with RLDA. RLDA provided reasonably accurate forecasts compared to CNTL, which is evident in the spatial distribution of rainfall and area-averaged three-hourly accumulated rainfall. Verification metrics for the three selected heavy rainfall events reveal that an optimal forecast performance (especially in the first six hours of free forecast) is obtained by the simulation with assimilation of radar and lightning data during the pre-forecast period, through correcting the position and timing of convective centres. The probability of detection (POD) values are higher for light rainfall categories than for the heavy rain categories. POD values were higher in RLDA than CNTL throughout simulation for all three events. For all these three selected events, fractions skill scores (FSS) of RLDA are always better than CNTL with different neighbourhood sizes for different threshold values throughout the forecast period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues. The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.
期刊最新文献
Multivariate post‐processing of probabilistic sub‐seasonal weather regime forecasts Relationship between vertical variation of cloud microphysical properties and thickness of the entrainment interfacial layer in Physics of Stratocumulus Top stratocumulus clouds Characteristics and trends of Atlantic tropical cyclones that do and do not develop from African easterly waves Teleconnection and the Antarctic response to the Indian Ocean Dipole in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models First trial for the assimilation of radiance data from MTVZA‐GY on board the new Russian satellite meteor‐M N2‐2 in the CMA‐GFS 4D‐VAR system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1