评估安宁疗护计划:实用的方法。

S Byrd, K Taylor
{"title":"评估安宁疗护计划:实用的方法。","authors":"S Byrd, K Taylor","doi":"10.1177/104990918900600114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid growth of hospice care in this country has precipitated a need for ensuring quality through administrative program evaluation. Over the past few years a number of studies have been undertaken to evaluate the effects ofhospice care in relation to cost effectiveness, benefit, and utility. The question, \"Is hospice effective?\" is being examined by hospice administrators and researchers. These investigators are beginning to explore what kinds of terminal care interventions, by whom, and in what combinations, work best for particular hospice patients and their families under a specific set of circumstances.1 Studies like the New Haven and St. Christopher's Hospice evaluation have utilized self report questionnaires obtained from patients or their spouses to assess phenomena such as depression, anxiety, and pain in reponse to hospice care interventions.3A4 Other comprehensive evaluations have been attempted through the review of patient records, and personal interviews with staff and families of deceased hospice patients. 5,6 There is a growing need for data that addresses overall hospice program services from a recipient or family perspective. The federal government has identified specific evaluation criteria for hospices choosing to participate in the hospice Medicare benefit. According to the Hospice Conditions of Participation: \"It is anticipated that critiques by patients' families provide a useful means to measure the degree to which patients' symptoms were managed.\" 7 Certainly, program evaluation is desirable and necessary. However, few hospices in this country have the expert knowledge needed to develop complex research designs and methodologies","PeriodicalId":77805,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice care","volume":"6 1","pages":"41-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/104990918900600114","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a hospice program: a practical approach.\",\"authors\":\"S Byrd, K Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/104990918900600114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid growth of hospice care in this country has precipitated a need for ensuring quality through administrative program evaluation. Over the past few years a number of studies have been undertaken to evaluate the effects ofhospice care in relation to cost effectiveness, benefit, and utility. The question, \\\"Is hospice effective?\\\" is being examined by hospice administrators and researchers. These investigators are beginning to explore what kinds of terminal care interventions, by whom, and in what combinations, work best for particular hospice patients and their families under a specific set of circumstances.1 Studies like the New Haven and St. Christopher's Hospice evaluation have utilized self report questionnaires obtained from patients or their spouses to assess phenomena such as depression, anxiety, and pain in reponse to hospice care interventions.3A4 Other comprehensive evaluations have been attempted through the review of patient records, and personal interviews with staff and families of deceased hospice patients. 5,6 There is a growing need for data that addresses overall hospice program services from a recipient or family perspective. The federal government has identified specific evaluation criteria for hospices choosing to participate in the hospice Medicare benefit. According to the Hospice Conditions of Participation: \\\"It is anticipated that critiques by patients' families provide a useful means to measure the degree to which patients' symptoms were managed.\\\" 7 Certainly, program evaluation is desirable and necessary. However, few hospices in this country have the expert knowledge needed to develop complex research designs and methodologies\",\"PeriodicalId\":77805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of hospice care\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"41-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/104990918900600114\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of hospice care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/104990918900600114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/104990918900600114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating a hospice program: a practical approach.
The rapid growth of hospice care in this country has precipitated a need for ensuring quality through administrative program evaluation. Over the past few years a number of studies have been undertaken to evaluate the effects ofhospice care in relation to cost effectiveness, benefit, and utility. The question, "Is hospice effective?" is being examined by hospice administrators and researchers. These investigators are beginning to explore what kinds of terminal care interventions, by whom, and in what combinations, work best for particular hospice patients and their families under a specific set of circumstances.1 Studies like the New Haven and St. Christopher's Hospice evaluation have utilized self report questionnaires obtained from patients or their spouses to assess phenomena such as depression, anxiety, and pain in reponse to hospice care interventions.3A4 Other comprehensive evaluations have been attempted through the review of patient records, and personal interviews with staff and families of deceased hospice patients. 5,6 There is a growing need for data that addresses overall hospice program services from a recipient or family perspective. The federal government has identified specific evaluation criteria for hospices choosing to participate in the hospice Medicare benefit. According to the Hospice Conditions of Participation: "It is anticipated that critiques by patients' families provide a useful means to measure the degree to which patients' symptoms were managed." 7 Certainly, program evaluation is desirable and necessary. However, few hospices in this country have the expert knowledge needed to develop complex research designs and methodologies
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On being terminally ill. Why hospice day care? Can hospice rehabilitate offenders? A milestone for hospices in the United States. Hospice day care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1