基于智能体模型的敏感性分析:一种新方案

IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Pub Date : 2022-01-11 DOI:10.1007/s10588-021-09358-5
Emanuele Borgonovo, Marco Pangallo, Jan Rivkin, Leonardo Rizzo, Nicolaj Siggelkow
{"title":"基于智能体模型的敏感性分析:一种新方案","authors":"Emanuele Borgonovo, Marco Pangallo, Jan Rivkin, Leonardo Rizzo, Nicolaj Siggelkow","doi":"10.1007/s10588-021-09358-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agent-based models (ABMs) are increasingly used in the management sciences. Though useful, ABMs are often critiqued: it is hard to discern why they produce the results they do and whether other assumptions would yield similar results. To help researchers address such critiques, we propose a systematic approach to conducting sensitivity analyses of ABMs. Our approach deals with a feature that can complicate sensitivity analyses: most ABMs include important non-parametric elements, while most sensitivity analysis methods are designed for parametric elements only. The approach moves from charting out the elements of an ABM through identifying the goal of the sensitivity analysis to specifying a method for the analysis. We focus on four common goals of sensitivity analysis: determining whether results are robust, which elements have the greatest impact on outcomes, how elements interact to shape outcomes, and which direction outcomes move when elements change. For the first three goals, we suggest a combination of randomized finite change indices calculation through a factorial design. For direction of change, we propose a modification of individual conditional expectation (ICE) plots to account for the stochastic nature of the ABM response. We illustrate our approach using the Garbage Can Model, a classic ABM that examines how organizations make decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity analysis of agent-based models: a new protocol\",\"authors\":\"Emanuele Borgonovo, Marco Pangallo, Jan Rivkin, Leonardo Rizzo, Nicolaj Siggelkow\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10588-021-09358-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Agent-based models (ABMs) are increasingly used in the management sciences. Though useful, ABMs are often critiqued: it is hard to discern why they produce the results they do and whether other assumptions would yield similar results. To help researchers address such critiques, we propose a systematic approach to conducting sensitivity analyses of ABMs. Our approach deals with a feature that can complicate sensitivity analyses: most ABMs include important non-parametric elements, while most sensitivity analysis methods are designed for parametric elements only. The approach moves from charting out the elements of an ABM through identifying the goal of the sensitivity analysis to specifying a method for the analysis. We focus on four common goals of sensitivity analysis: determining whether results are robust, which elements have the greatest impact on outcomes, how elements interact to shape outcomes, and which direction outcomes move when elements change. For the first three goals, we suggest a combination of randomized finite change indices calculation through a factorial design. For direction of change, we propose a modification of individual conditional expectation (ICE) plots to account for the stochastic nature of the ABM response. We illustrate our approach using the Garbage Can Model, a classic ABM that examines how organizations make decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-021-09358-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-021-09358-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

基于agent的模型(ABMs)在管理科学中的应用越来越广泛。虽然有用,但ABMs经常受到批评:很难辨别为什么它们会产生这样的结果,以及其他假设是否会产生类似的结果。为了帮助研究人员解决这些批评,我们提出了一种系统的方法来进行ABMs的敏感性分析。我们的方法处理了一个可能使敏感性分析复杂化的特征:大多数ABMs包括重要的非参数元素,而大多数敏感性分析方法仅针对参数元素设计。该方法通过确定敏感性分析的目标,从绘制出ABM的元素,到指定分析的方法。我们关注敏感性分析的四个共同目标:确定结果是否稳健,哪些因素对结果的影响最大,因素如何相互作用以形成结果,以及当因素变化时结果的方向。对于前三个目标,我们建议通过析因设计组合随机有限变化指数计算。对于变化的方向,我们提出了对个体条件期望(ICE)图的修改,以解释ABM响应的随机性。我们使用垃圾桶模型来说明我们的方法,这是一个经典的ABM模型,用于检查组织如何做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sensitivity analysis of agent-based models: a new protocol

Agent-based models (ABMs) are increasingly used in the management sciences. Though useful, ABMs are often critiqued: it is hard to discern why they produce the results they do and whether other assumptions would yield similar results. To help researchers address such critiques, we propose a systematic approach to conducting sensitivity analyses of ABMs. Our approach deals with a feature that can complicate sensitivity analyses: most ABMs include important non-parametric elements, while most sensitivity analysis methods are designed for parametric elements only. The approach moves from charting out the elements of an ABM through identifying the goal of the sensitivity analysis to specifying a method for the analysis. We focus on four common goals of sensitivity analysis: determining whether results are robust, which elements have the greatest impact on outcomes, how elements interact to shape outcomes, and which direction outcomes move when elements change. For the first three goals, we suggest a combination of randomized finite change indices calculation through a factorial design. For direction of change, we propose a modification of individual conditional expectation (ICE) plots to account for the stochastic nature of the ABM response. We illustrate our approach using the Garbage Can Model, a classic ABM that examines how organizations make decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory provides an international forum for interdisciplinary research that combines computation, organizations and society. The goal is to advance the state of science in formal reasoning, analysis, and system building drawing on and encouraging advances in areas at the confluence of social networks, artificial intelligence, complexity, machine learning, sociology, business, political science, economics, and operations research. The papers in this journal will lead to the development of newtheories that explain and predict the behaviour of complex adaptive systems, new computational models and technologies that are responsible to society, business, policy, and law, new methods for integrating data, computational models, analysis and visualization techniques. Various types of papers and underlying research are welcome. Papers presenting, validating, or applying models and/or computational techniques, new algorithms, dynamic metrics for networks and complex systems and papers comparing, contrasting and docking computational models are strongly encouraged. Both applied and theoretical work is strongly encouraged. The editors encourage theoretical research on fundamental principles of social behaviour such as coordination, cooperation, evolution, and destabilization. The editors encourage applied research representing actual organizational or policy problems that can be addressed using computational tools. Work related to fundamental concepts, corporate, military or intelligence issues are welcome.
期刊最新文献
The “chanification” of white supremacist extremism Investigating the use of belief-bias to measure acceptance of false information Modeling and analyzing network dynamics of COVID-19 vaccine information propagation in the Chinese Sina Microblog Misogynistic targeting of women in power predicts broader online harassment patterns The dynamic effects of transformational leadership on employee retention and employability over time: an agent-based model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1