重新审视合作生产:从知识多元化到减少灾害风险的行动

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Disaster Prevention and Management Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0131
Minh Tran, Dayoon Kim
{"title":"重新审视合作生产:从知识多元化到减少灾害风险的行动","authors":"Minh Tran, Dayoon Kim","doi":"10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The authors revisit the notion of co-production, highlight more critical and re-politicized forms of co-production and introduce three principles for its operationalization. The paper’s viewpoint aims to find entry points for enabling more equitable disaster research and actions via co-production.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors draw insights from the authors’ reflections as climate and disaster researchers and literature on knowledge politics in the context of disaster and climate change, especially within critical disaster studies and feminist political ecology.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Disaster studies can better contribute to disaster risk reduction via political co-production and situating local and Indigenous knowledge at the center through three principles, i.e. ensuring knowledge plurality, surfacing norms and assumptions in knowledge production and driving actions that tackle existing knowledge (and broader sociopolitical) structures.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The authors draw out three principles to enable the political function of co-production based on firsthand experiences of working with local and Indigenous peoples and insights from a diverse set of co-production, feminist political ecology and critical disaster studies literature. Future research can observe how it can utilize these principles in its respective contexts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-production revisited: from knowledge plurality to action for disaster risk reduction\",\"authors\":\"Minh Tran, Dayoon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The authors revisit the notion of co-production, highlight more critical and re-politicized forms of co-production and introduce three principles for its operationalization. The paper’s viewpoint aims to find entry points for enabling more equitable disaster research and actions via co-production.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The authors draw insights from the authors’ reflections as climate and disaster researchers and literature on knowledge politics in the context of disaster and climate change, especially within critical disaster studies and feminist political ecology.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Disaster studies can better contribute to disaster risk reduction via political co-production and situating local and Indigenous knowledge at the center through three principles, i.e. ensuring knowledge plurality, surfacing norms and assumptions in knowledge production and driving actions that tackle existing knowledge (and broader sociopolitical) structures.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The authors draw out three principles to enable the political function of co-production based on firsthand experiences of working with local and Indigenous peoples and insights from a diverse set of co-production, feminist political ecology and critical disaster studies literature. Future research can observe how it can utilize these principles in its respective contexts.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disaster Prevention and Management\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disaster Prevention and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0131\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Prevention and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者重新审视了合拍片的概念,强调了更具批判性和再政治化的合拍片形式,并介绍了合拍片运作的三个原则。这篇论文的观点旨在找到切入点,通过合作生产实现更公平的灾害研究和行动。设计/方法/方法作者从他们作为气候和灾害研究人员的反思和灾害和气候变化背景下的知识政治文献中获得见解,特别是在批判性灾害研究和女权主义政治生态学中。灾害研究可以通过政治合作生产和将当地和土著知识置于中心位置,从而更好地促进减少灾害风险。这三个原则是:确保知识多元化、揭示知识生产中的规范和假设,以及推动解决现有知识(以及更广泛的社会政治)结构的行动。原创性/价值作者根据与当地和土著人民合作的第一手经验,以及从各种合作制作、女权主义政治生态学和批判性灾难研究文献中获得的见解,提出了三项原则,使合作制作能够发挥政治功能。未来的研究可以观察它如何在各自的背景下利用这些原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-production revisited: from knowledge plurality to action for disaster risk reduction

Purpose

The authors revisit the notion of co-production, highlight more critical and re-politicized forms of co-production and introduce three principles for its operationalization. The paper’s viewpoint aims to find entry points for enabling more equitable disaster research and actions via co-production.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors draw insights from the authors’ reflections as climate and disaster researchers and literature on knowledge politics in the context of disaster and climate change, especially within critical disaster studies and feminist political ecology.

Findings

Disaster studies can better contribute to disaster risk reduction via political co-production and situating local and Indigenous knowledge at the center through three principles, i.e. ensuring knowledge plurality, surfacing norms and assumptions in knowledge production and driving actions that tackle existing knowledge (and broader sociopolitical) structures.

Originality/value

The authors draw out three principles to enable the political function of co-production based on firsthand experiences of working with local and Indigenous peoples and insights from a diverse set of co-production, feminist political ecology and critical disaster studies literature. Future research can observe how it can utilize these principles in its respective contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Disaster Prevention and Management, An International Journal, sets out to advance the available knowledge in the fields of disaster prevention and management and to act as an integrative agent for extant methodologies and activities relating to disaster emergency and crisis management. Publishing high quality, refereed papers, the journal supports the exchange of ideas, experience and practice between academics, practitioners and policy-makers.
期刊最新文献
Creative research with indigenous women: challenging marginalisation through collective spaces and livelihoods practices Punishment and survival – incarcerated persons' experiences with extreme heat in Texas prisons Facilitating the voices of people with disabilities in disaster research: a case study of participatory timeline methodologies in Sindhupalchok Nepal Reflexivity and interdisciplinarity: the reflexive journey of an interdisciplinary research team in disaster risk reduction Comparative study for underlying concepts of land acquisition during post-disaster recovery in Italy, the United States and Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1