使用应用研究-实践周期:文化相关工程拓展的迭代改进

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of formative design in learning Pub Date : 2018-11-07 DOI:10.1007/s41686-018-0023-7
Andrew Gillen, Cheryl Carrico, Jake Grohs, Holly Matusovich
{"title":"使用应用研究-实践周期:文化相关工程拓展的迭代改进","authors":"Andrew Gillen, Cheryl Carrico, Jake Grohs, Holly Matusovich","doi":"10.1007/s41686-018-0023-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By recognizing disconnects between practitioner conceptions of engineering outreach with young people (specifically a lack of focus on cultural relevance), and researcher conceptions of a culturally relevant approach to engineering outreach, we set out to bridge theory and practice by iteratively designing and implementing interventions. We engaged in a cycle of research-informed practice and practice-informed research to develop more culturally relevant approaches to broadening participation in engineering. Research-based findings focused on the importance of understanding common misconceptions of engineering that intervention participants and facilitators may possess. Such understanding enables iterative improvement of activities and research instruments that yield meaningful results. Practice-based insights included findings regarding intervention structure such as needs for different facilitator-to-student ratios for different age groups, and providing volunteer facilitators with a list of “helpful hints” to consider and/or open-ended questions to ask.","PeriodicalId":73753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of formative design in learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using an Applied Research-Practice Cycle: Iterative Improvement of Culturally Relevant Engineering Outreach\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Gillen, Cheryl Carrico, Jake Grohs, Holly Matusovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41686-018-0023-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By recognizing disconnects between practitioner conceptions of engineering outreach with young people (specifically a lack of focus on cultural relevance), and researcher conceptions of a culturally relevant approach to engineering outreach, we set out to bridge theory and practice by iteratively designing and implementing interventions. We engaged in a cycle of research-informed practice and practice-informed research to develop more culturally relevant approaches to broadening participation in engineering. Research-based findings focused on the importance of understanding common misconceptions of engineering that intervention participants and facilitators may possess. Such understanding enables iterative improvement of activities and research instruments that yield meaningful results. Practice-based insights included findings regarding intervention structure such as needs for different facilitator-to-student ratios for different age groups, and providing volunteer facilitators with a list of “helpful hints” to consider and/or open-ended questions to ask.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of formative design in learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of formative design in learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-018-0023-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of formative design in learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-018-0023-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过认识到从业者对年轻人的工程推广概念(特别是缺乏对文化相关性的关注)与研究人员对工程推广文化相关方法的概念之间的脱节,我们开始通过迭代设计和实施干预措施来架起理论和实践的桥梁。我们进行了一个研究为基础的实践和实践为基础的研究的循环,以开发更多与文化相关的方法来扩大工程的参与。基于研究的发现集中在理解干预参与者和促进者可能拥有的工程常见误解的重要性。这样的理解使活动和研究工具的迭代改进能够产生有意义的结果。基于实践的见解包括关于干预结构的发现,例如不同年龄组对不同辅导员与学生比例的需求,以及为志愿辅导员提供一系列“有用的提示”,供他们考虑和/或提出开放式问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using an Applied Research-Practice Cycle: Iterative Improvement of Culturally Relevant Engineering Outreach
By recognizing disconnects between practitioner conceptions of engineering outreach with young people (specifically a lack of focus on cultural relevance), and researcher conceptions of a culturally relevant approach to engineering outreach, we set out to bridge theory and practice by iteratively designing and implementing interventions. We engaged in a cycle of research-informed practice and practice-informed research to develop more culturally relevant approaches to broadening participation in engineering. Research-based findings focused on the importance of understanding common misconceptions of engineering that intervention participants and facilitators may possess. Such understanding enables iterative improvement of activities and research instruments that yield meaningful results. Practice-based insights included findings regarding intervention structure such as needs for different facilitator-to-student ratios for different age groups, and providing volunteer facilitators with a list of “helpful hints” to consider and/or open-ended questions to ask.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of QR Codes to Enhance Learning in a Graduate-Level Clinical Course Secondary School Teachers’ Use of Formative Assessment Practice to Create Co-regulated Learning Design, Development, and Formative Evaluation of a Hybrid Remote Quantum Laboratory Supporting HBCU Partnerships Correction: Faculty in Action: Researching a Community of Practice Approach to Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment How Do We Flip Our Language Classroom? Reassessing the Flipped Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1