哈蒂的元分析在教育研究框架中的真实运用:一个研究者的反思

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of formative design in learning Pub Date : 2021-07-15 DOI:10.1007/s41686-021-00056-8
Holley L. Handley, Nancy B. Hastings
{"title":"哈蒂的元分析在教育研究框架中的真实运用:一个研究者的反思","authors":"Holley L. Handley, Nancy B. Hastings","doi":"10.1007/s41686-021-00056-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article is a formative reflection that walks the reader through the experience of taking an existing body of research and then using one aspect of that analytical framework to conduct a new and original study. This reflection presents an account of that research process. Hattie (2009) has conducted extensive research examining influences on student achievement. This article describes how a researcher took the domains he defined to categorize the influences on student achievement and used them to frame the newly developed investigation. This article reflects on the unique application of Hattie’s domains as a lens to examine a K-12 organization. An overview of the study and a summary of the findings are presented to give the reader context. The focus of this article is a detailed reflection on how the research was conceived and formed. The following six questions guide this reflection:</p><p>1. Was the experience useful?</p><p>2. What was learned?</p><p>3. How did this experience facilitate personal growth/development?</p><p>4. How was this experience impactful?</p><p>5. What would, on reflection, be done differently?</p><p>6. Were the research choices well-reasoned?</p><p>A thoughtful reflection on the process serves to inform decisions critical to formulate potential additional studies. Reflecting on the past process provides thoughtful insights for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of formative design in learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Authentic Use of Hattie’s Meta-analyses to Frame Educational Research: a Researcher’s Reflection\",\"authors\":\"Holley L. Handley, Nancy B. Hastings\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41686-021-00056-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article is a formative reflection that walks the reader through the experience of taking an existing body of research and then using one aspect of that analytical framework to conduct a new and original study. This reflection presents an account of that research process. Hattie (2009) has conducted extensive research examining influences on student achievement. This article describes how a researcher took the domains he defined to categorize the influences on student achievement and used them to frame the newly developed investigation. This article reflects on the unique application of Hattie’s domains as a lens to examine a K-12 organization. An overview of the study and a summary of the findings are presented to give the reader context. The focus of this article is a detailed reflection on how the research was conceived and formed. The following six questions guide this reflection:</p><p>1. Was the experience useful?</p><p>2. What was learned?</p><p>3. How did this experience facilitate personal growth/development?</p><p>4. How was this experience impactful?</p><p>5. What would, on reflection, be done differently?</p><p>6. Were the research choices well-reasoned?</p><p>A thoughtful reflection on the process serves to inform decisions critical to formulate potential additional studies. Reflecting on the past process provides thoughtful insights for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of formative design in learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of formative design in learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-021-00056-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of formative design in learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-021-00056-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是一种形成性的反思,引导读者通过现有的研究机构,然后使用分析框架的一个方面来进行新的和原创的研究。本文反映了对这一研究过程的描述。Hattie(2009)对影响学生成绩的因素进行了广泛的研究。这篇文章描述了一个研究人员如何将他定义的领域用于分类对学生成绩的影响,并使用它们来构建新开发的调查。这篇文章反映了Hattie的领域作为审视K-12组织的透镜的独特应用。研究的概述和研究结果的总结,提出给读者的背景。本文的重点是详细反思该研究是如何构思和形成的。以下六个问题指导这种反思:这段经历有用吗?学到了什么?这段经历如何促进个人成长/发展?这段经历对你有什么影响?经过深思熟虑,会有哪些不同的做法?研究选择是否合理?对这一过程进行深思熟虑的反思有助于为制定潜在的额外研究的关键决策提供信息。反思过去的过程为未来的研究提供了深思熟虑的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Authentic Use of Hattie’s Meta-analyses to Frame Educational Research: a Researcher’s Reflection

This article is a formative reflection that walks the reader through the experience of taking an existing body of research and then using one aspect of that analytical framework to conduct a new and original study. This reflection presents an account of that research process. Hattie (2009) has conducted extensive research examining influences on student achievement. This article describes how a researcher took the domains he defined to categorize the influences on student achievement and used them to frame the newly developed investigation. This article reflects on the unique application of Hattie’s domains as a lens to examine a K-12 organization. An overview of the study and a summary of the findings are presented to give the reader context. The focus of this article is a detailed reflection on how the research was conceived and formed. The following six questions guide this reflection:

1. Was the experience useful?

2. What was learned?

3. How did this experience facilitate personal growth/development?

4. How was this experience impactful?

5. What would, on reflection, be done differently?

6. Were the research choices well-reasoned?

A thoughtful reflection on the process serves to inform decisions critical to formulate potential additional studies. Reflecting on the past process provides thoughtful insights for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of QR Codes to Enhance Learning in a Graduate-Level Clinical Course Secondary School Teachers’ Use of Formative Assessment Practice to Create Co-regulated Learning Design, Development, and Formative Evaluation of a Hybrid Remote Quantum Laboratory Supporting HBCU Partnerships Correction: Faculty in Action: Researching a Community of Practice Approach to Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment How Do We Flip Our Language Classroom? Reassessing the Flipped Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1