Daniel M. Adamson, Gustavo M. Sbatella, Andrew R. Kniss, Franck E. Dayan
{"title":"减少灌溉对土壤施用除草剂耗散和轮作作物反应的影响","authors":"Daniel M. Adamson, Gustavo M. Sbatella, Andrew R. Kniss, Franck E. Dayan","doi":"10.1017/wet.2023.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil-applied herbicides are important for controlling weeds in many crops but risk damage to susceptible rotational crops if they persist. Field studies were conducted in Powell, Wyoming from 2015 through 2017 to evaluate the effect of reduced water availability on soil-applied herbicide dissipation. Eight soil-applied herbicides, applied to dry bean or corn, were exposed to three season-long irrigation treatments (100, 85, and 70% of estimated crop evapotranspiration [ETc]) by overhead sprinkler. Soil samples were collected to a depth of 10 cm from 0 to 140 d after application, and soil herbicide concentrations were quantified using gas or liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Herbicide concentrations were regressed over time to produce a soil half-life estimate for each herbicide and irrigation treatment. Reduced irrigation decreased dry bean yield by up to 77%, and corn yield by up to 50%. After adjusting for precipitation, the lowest irrigation treatment received 78% as much water as the full irrigation treatment in 2015 and 76% in 2016. This significantly increased the soil half-life of imazethapyr, but did not increase the soil half-life of atrazine, pyroxasulfone, saflufenacil, ethalfluralin, trifluralin, or pendimethalin. Reduced irrigation did not increase carryover injury to rotational crops from these herbicides one year after application. Instead, carryover response was determined by the inherent persistence of individual herbicides. Imazethapyr (0.1 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>) injured rotational sugar beet, and isoxaflutole (0.1 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>) injured rotational dry bean. Pyroxasulfone (0.2 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>), atrazine (2.0 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>), saflufenacil (0.1 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>) + dimethenamid-P (0.6 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>), ethalfluralin (0.8 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>), trifluralin (0.6 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>), and pendimethalin (1.1 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>) did not injure rotational crops regardless of irrigation treatment. Drought stress sufficient to cause up to 77% crop yield loss did not increase soil-applied herbicide carryover.","PeriodicalId":23710,"journal":{"name":"Weed Technology","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduced irrigation impact on soil-applied herbicide dissipation and rotational crop response\",\"authors\":\"Daniel M. Adamson, Gustavo M. Sbatella, Andrew R. Kniss, Franck E. Dayan\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/wet.2023.85\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil-applied herbicides are important for controlling weeds in many crops but risk damage to susceptible rotational crops if they persist. Field studies were conducted in Powell, Wyoming from 2015 through 2017 to evaluate the effect of reduced water availability on soil-applied herbicide dissipation. Eight soil-applied herbicides, applied to dry bean or corn, were exposed to three season-long irrigation treatments (100, 85, and 70% of estimated crop evapotranspiration [ETc]) by overhead sprinkler. Soil samples were collected to a depth of 10 cm from 0 to 140 d after application, and soil herbicide concentrations were quantified using gas or liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Herbicide concentrations were regressed over time to produce a soil half-life estimate for each herbicide and irrigation treatment. Reduced irrigation decreased dry bean yield by up to 77%, and corn yield by up to 50%. After adjusting for precipitation, the lowest irrigation treatment received 78% as much water as the full irrigation treatment in 2015 and 76% in 2016. This significantly increased the soil half-life of imazethapyr, but did not increase the soil half-life of atrazine, pyroxasulfone, saflufenacil, ethalfluralin, trifluralin, or pendimethalin. Reduced irrigation did not increase carryover injury to rotational crops from these herbicides one year after application. Instead, carryover response was determined by the inherent persistence of individual herbicides. Imazethapyr (0.1 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>) injured rotational sugar beet, and isoxaflutole (0.1 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>) injured rotational dry bean. Pyroxasulfone (0.2 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>), atrazine (2.0 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>), saflufenacil (0.1 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>) + dimethenamid-P (0.6 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>), ethalfluralin (0.8 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>), trifluralin (0.6 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>), and pendimethalin (1.1 kg ai ha<jats:sup>-1</jats:sup>) did not injure rotational crops regardless of irrigation treatment. Drought stress sufficient to cause up to 77% crop yield loss did not increase soil-applied herbicide carryover.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weed Technology\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weed Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.85\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.85","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
土壤施用除草剂对控制许多作物的杂草很重要,但如果杂草持续存在,可能会对易感轮作作物造成损害。2015年至2017年在怀俄明州鲍威尔进行了实地研究,以评估水分有效性降低对土壤施用除草剂消散的影响。将8种土壤除草剂分别施用于干豆或玉米上,通过顶置洒水器进行3个季节的灌溉处理(分别为作物蒸散量的100%、85%和70%[等])。施用后0 ~ 140 d采集土壤样品至10 cm深度,采用气相色谱或液相色谱和质谱法定量土壤除草剂浓度。除草剂浓度随时间回归,得出每种除草剂和灌溉处理的土壤半衰期估计。减少灌溉可使干豆产量减少77%,玉米产量减少50%。经降水调整后,2015年最低灌溉处理水量为充分灌溉处理水量的78%,2016年为76%。这显著增加了吡嗪的土壤半衰期,但没有增加阿特拉津、pyroxasulfone、氟虫酸、乙氟拉林、三氟拉林和戊二甲基灵的土壤半衰期。减少灌溉并没有增加施用一年后这些除草剂对轮作作物的结转伤害。相反,遗留反应是由单个除草剂的固有持久性决定的。Imazethapyr (0.1 kg / ha-1)对轮作甜菜有害,异草氟唑(0.1 kg / ha-1)对轮作干豆有害。吡唑酮(0.2 kg ai ha-1)、阿特拉津(2.0 kg ai ha-1)、氟虫腈(0.1 kg ai ha-1) +二甲酰胺- p (0.6 kg ai ha-1)、氟虫灵(0.8 kg ai ha-1)、三氟虫灵(0.6 kg ai ha-1)和二甲虫灵(1.1 kg ai ha-1)对轮作作物均无损害,无论灌溉方式如何。足以造成高达77%作物产量损失的干旱胁迫并没有增加土壤施用除草剂的携带性。
Reduced irrigation impact on soil-applied herbicide dissipation and rotational crop response
Soil-applied herbicides are important for controlling weeds in many crops but risk damage to susceptible rotational crops if they persist. Field studies were conducted in Powell, Wyoming from 2015 through 2017 to evaluate the effect of reduced water availability on soil-applied herbicide dissipation. Eight soil-applied herbicides, applied to dry bean or corn, were exposed to three season-long irrigation treatments (100, 85, and 70% of estimated crop evapotranspiration [ETc]) by overhead sprinkler. Soil samples were collected to a depth of 10 cm from 0 to 140 d after application, and soil herbicide concentrations were quantified using gas or liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Herbicide concentrations were regressed over time to produce a soil half-life estimate for each herbicide and irrigation treatment. Reduced irrigation decreased dry bean yield by up to 77%, and corn yield by up to 50%. After adjusting for precipitation, the lowest irrigation treatment received 78% as much water as the full irrigation treatment in 2015 and 76% in 2016. This significantly increased the soil half-life of imazethapyr, but did not increase the soil half-life of atrazine, pyroxasulfone, saflufenacil, ethalfluralin, trifluralin, or pendimethalin. Reduced irrigation did not increase carryover injury to rotational crops from these herbicides one year after application. Instead, carryover response was determined by the inherent persistence of individual herbicides. Imazethapyr (0.1 kg ai ha-1) injured rotational sugar beet, and isoxaflutole (0.1 kg ai ha-1) injured rotational dry bean. Pyroxasulfone (0.2 kg ai ha-1), atrazine (2.0 kg ai ha-1), saflufenacil (0.1 kg ai ha-1) + dimethenamid-P (0.6 kg ai ha-1), ethalfluralin (0.8 kg ai ha-1), trifluralin (0.6 kg ai ha-1), and pendimethalin (1.1 kg ai ha-1) did not injure rotational crops regardless of irrigation treatment. Drought stress sufficient to cause up to 77% crop yield loss did not increase soil-applied herbicide carryover.
期刊介绍:
Weed Technology publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on understanding how weeds are managed.
The journal focuses on:
- Applied aspects concerning the management of weeds in agricultural systems
- Herbicides used to manage undesired vegetation, weed biology and control
- Weed/crop management systems
- Reports of new weed problems
-New technologies for weed management and special articles emphasizing technology transfer to improve weed control
-Articles dealing with plant growth regulators and management of undesired plant growth may also be accepted, provided there is clear relevance to weed science technology, e.g., turfgrass or woody plant management along rights-of-way, vegetation management in forest, aquatic, or other non-crop situations.
-Surveys, education, and extension topics related to weeds will also be considered