Mário Correia Fernandes, José Carlos Dias, João Pedro Vidal Nunes
{"title":"能源期货中替代随机波动率模型及其决定因素的绩效比较:COVID-19和俄罗斯-乌克兰冲突特征","authors":"Mário Correia Fernandes, José Carlos Dias, João Pedro Vidal Nunes","doi":"10.1002/fut.22469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the volatility dynamics of futures contracts on crude oil, natural gas, and gasoline. An appropriate Bayesian model comparison exercise between seven stochastic volatility (SV) models is estimated using daily prices for our futures contracts between 2005 and 2023. Moreover, to assess the impacts of COVID-19 and the Russia–Ukraine conflict on volatility, we analyze these two subsamples. Overall, we find that: (i) the Bayes factor shows that the SV model with <math altimg=\"urn:x-wiley:02707314:media:fut22469:fut22469-math-0001\" location=\"graphic/fut22469-math-0001.png\">\n<semantics>\n<mrow>\n<mi>t</mi>\n</mrow>\n$t$</annotation>\n</semantics></math>-distributed innovations outperforms the competing models; (ii) crude oil contracts with different expiry dates may require the introduction of leverage effects; (iii) the <math altimg=\"urn:x-wiley:02707314:media:fut22469:fut22469-math-0002\" location=\"graphic/fut22469-math-0002.png\">\n<semantics>\n<mrow>\n<mi>t</mi>\n</mrow>\n$t$</annotation>\n</semantics></math>-distributed innovations remain the appropriate model for the COVID-19 subsample, while jumps are needed in the conflict period; and (iv) other Bayesian criteria more appropriate to short-term predictive ability—such as the conditional and the observed-date deviance information criterion—suggest other rank order to model our futures contracts, despite the agreements for the best models.","PeriodicalId":15863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Futures Markets","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of alternative stochastic volatility models and its determinants in energy futures: COVID-19 and Russia–Ukraine conflict features\",\"authors\":\"Mário Correia Fernandes, José Carlos Dias, João Pedro Vidal Nunes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fut.22469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper studies the volatility dynamics of futures contracts on crude oil, natural gas, and gasoline. An appropriate Bayesian model comparison exercise between seven stochastic volatility (SV) models is estimated using daily prices for our futures contracts between 2005 and 2023. Moreover, to assess the impacts of COVID-19 and the Russia–Ukraine conflict on volatility, we analyze these two subsamples. Overall, we find that: (i) the Bayes factor shows that the SV model with <math altimg=\\\"urn:x-wiley:02707314:media:fut22469:fut22469-math-0001\\\" location=\\\"graphic/fut22469-math-0001.png\\\">\\n<semantics>\\n<mrow>\\n<mi>t</mi>\\n</mrow>\\n$t$</annotation>\\n</semantics></math>-distributed innovations outperforms the competing models; (ii) crude oil contracts with different expiry dates may require the introduction of leverage effects; (iii) the <math altimg=\\\"urn:x-wiley:02707314:media:fut22469:fut22469-math-0002\\\" location=\\\"graphic/fut22469-math-0002.png\\\">\\n<semantics>\\n<mrow>\\n<mi>t</mi>\\n</mrow>\\n$t$</annotation>\\n</semantics></math>-distributed innovations remain the appropriate model for the COVID-19 subsample, while jumps are needed in the conflict period; and (iv) other Bayesian criteria more appropriate to short-term predictive ability—such as the conditional and the observed-date deviance information criterion—suggest other rank order to model our futures contracts, despite the agreements for the best models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Futures Markets\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Futures Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22469\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Futures Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22469","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance comparison of alternative stochastic volatility models and its determinants in energy futures: COVID-19 and Russia–Ukraine conflict features
This paper studies the volatility dynamics of futures contracts on crude oil, natural gas, and gasoline. An appropriate Bayesian model comparison exercise between seven stochastic volatility (SV) models is estimated using daily prices for our futures contracts between 2005 and 2023. Moreover, to assess the impacts of COVID-19 and the Russia–Ukraine conflict on volatility, we analyze these two subsamples. Overall, we find that: (i) the Bayes factor shows that the SV model with -distributed innovations outperforms the competing models; (ii) crude oil contracts with different expiry dates may require the introduction of leverage effects; (iii) the -distributed innovations remain the appropriate model for the COVID-19 subsample, while jumps are needed in the conflict period; and (iv) other Bayesian criteria more appropriate to short-term predictive ability—such as the conditional and the observed-date deviance information criterion—suggest other rank order to model our futures contracts, despite the agreements for the best models.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Futures Markets chronicles the latest developments in financial futures and derivatives. It publishes timely, innovative articles written by leading finance academics and professionals. Coverage ranges from the highly practical to theoretical topics that include futures, derivatives, risk management and control, financial engineering, new financial instruments, hedging strategies, analysis of trading systems, legal, accounting, and regulatory issues, and portfolio optimization. This publication contains the very latest research from the top experts.