作为档案的小说:弗朗西斯·e·w·哈珀1892年关于内战和重建的小说《爱奥拉·勒罗伊》的圆桌会议

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY CIVIL WAR HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI:10.1353/cwh.2023.a912509
Jim Downs, Rhae Lynn Barnes, Henry Louis Gates Jr., Rashauna Johnson, John Stauffer, Faith Smith, Nii Ayikwei Parkes
{"title":"作为档案的小说:弗朗西斯·e·w·哈珀1892年关于内战和重建的小说《爱奥拉·勒罗伊》的圆桌会议","authors":"Jim Downs, Rhae Lynn Barnes, Henry Louis Gates Jr., Rashauna Johnson, John Stauffer, Faith Smith, Nii Ayikwei Parkes","doi":"10.1353/cwh.2023.a912509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> A Novel as Archive<span>A Roundtable on Frances E. W. Harper’s 1892 Novel, <em>Iola Leroy</em>, about the Civil War and Reconstruction</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Jim Downs, <em>Editor and Moderator</em> (bio), Rhae Lynn Barnes (bio), Henry Louis Gates Jr. (bio), Rashauna Johnson (bio), John Stauffer (bio), Faith Smith (bio), and Nii Ayikwei Parkes (bio) </li> </ul> <strong>JIM DOWNS:</strong> <p>Over the past year at the Hutchins Center for African and African American Research at Harvard University, there have been lots of discussions about why archives matter. These conversations have come into sharp focus based on the significance of Saidiya Hartman’s article “Venus in Two Acts” and her books <em>Lose Your Mother: A Journey along the Atlantic Slave Route</em> and <em>Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiment</em> and Marisa J. Fuentes’s <em>Dispossessed Lives: Enslaved Women, Violence, and the Archive</em>, which raise critical questions about how we can uncover the lives of enslaved and oppressed people in traditional archives.<sup>1</sup> While their critical research has helped many of us remember the ideological forces that shaped the creation of archives and provided a model on how to rigorously interrogate surviving sources, I am afraid that some scholars have used this scholarship to become pessimistic about archival research. What I learned from Hartman and Fuentes <strong>[End Page 65]</strong> was how to think more creatively and critically about interpreting surviving sources, not a call designed to shut down archival research. But I think their work is now being used to claim that Black subjectivity is almost impossible to uncover in traditional archives. Over the past academic year at the Hutchins Center, I have had conversations over lunch with Rashauna Johnson and Rhae Lynn Barnes about this, and we decided to turn our informal conversations into a roundtable discussion that could be published in <em>Civil War History</em>. In part, Civil War history has been divorced from many critical conversations happening within African American studies about theory and method, so I wanted to create an interdisciplinary forum that would introduce Civil War historians to this conversation. When Rashauna, Rhae Lynn, and I discussed how to organize the conversation, we decided to select a primary source that we would all read and analyze based on our own scholarly orientations. We also thought this would be a good exercise for readers of the journal. They too could read the source and the accompanying roundtable and use it in their research or teaching.</p> <p>While there are endless sources that could serve as the bridge between African American studies and Civil War studies, I decided on Frances E. W. Harper’s 1892 novel, <em>Iola Leroy</em>, which chronicles the Black experience during the Civil War. Harper was born free to Black parents on September 24, 1825. She was a poet and devoted abolitionist before the Civil War. Decades afterward, she decided to write a novel that aimed to tell the many complicated stories of Black people during the war. While <em>Iola Leroy</em> received critical attention at the time of its publication, it faded from view outside of Black intellectual and feminist circles during the first half of the twentieth century.</p> <p>In the early 1980s, historian and literary critic Henry Louis Gates Jr. led a massive effort to recover and republish books written by Black women. Harper’s novel was often considered the first novel written by a Black woman, until Gates rediscovered Harriet Wilson’s 1859 novel, <em>Our Nig</em>.</p> <p>In keeping with the journal’s commitment to interdisciplinary studies, I invited Gates, an eminent scholar, to join our conversation. I also invited John Stauffer, a leading historian and literary critic, who is an expert in Civil War–era studies, nineteenth-century literature, and African American studies. We hosted the forum at Hutchins and invited Hutchins fellows to attend. Faith Smith, a literary critic who specializes in Caribbean literature, added comments throughout the conversation, and so did Nii Ayikwei Parkes, an award-winning Ghanaian-British writer. <strong>[End Page 66]</strong></p> <strong>JIM DOWNS:</strong> <p>I want to begin the conversation with asking each participant to reflect on when you first read <em>Iola Leroy</em> and what your impressions of the novel were. I also want the conversation to be organic, so please jump in at any point.</p> <p>I’m happy to begin. I read...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43056,"journal":{"name":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel as Archive: A Roundtable on Frances E. W. Harper's 1892 Novel, Iola Leroy, about the Civil War and Reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Jim Downs, Rhae Lynn Barnes, Henry Louis Gates Jr., Rashauna Johnson, John Stauffer, Faith Smith, Nii Ayikwei Parkes\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cwh.2023.a912509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> A Novel as Archive<span>A Roundtable on Frances E. W. Harper’s 1892 Novel, <em>Iola Leroy</em>, about the Civil War and Reconstruction</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Jim Downs, <em>Editor and Moderator</em> (bio), Rhae Lynn Barnes (bio), Henry Louis Gates Jr. (bio), Rashauna Johnson (bio), John Stauffer (bio), Faith Smith (bio), and Nii Ayikwei Parkes (bio) </li> </ul> <strong>JIM DOWNS:</strong> <p>Over the past year at the Hutchins Center for African and African American Research at Harvard University, there have been lots of discussions about why archives matter. These conversations have come into sharp focus based on the significance of Saidiya Hartman’s article “Venus in Two Acts” and her books <em>Lose Your Mother: A Journey along the Atlantic Slave Route</em> and <em>Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiment</em> and Marisa J. Fuentes’s <em>Dispossessed Lives: Enslaved Women, Violence, and the Archive</em>, which raise critical questions about how we can uncover the lives of enslaved and oppressed people in traditional archives.<sup>1</sup> While their critical research has helped many of us remember the ideological forces that shaped the creation of archives and provided a model on how to rigorously interrogate surviving sources, I am afraid that some scholars have used this scholarship to become pessimistic about archival research. What I learned from Hartman and Fuentes <strong>[End Page 65]</strong> was how to think more creatively and critically about interpreting surviving sources, not a call designed to shut down archival research. But I think their work is now being used to claim that Black subjectivity is almost impossible to uncover in traditional archives. Over the past academic year at the Hutchins Center, I have had conversations over lunch with Rashauna Johnson and Rhae Lynn Barnes about this, and we decided to turn our informal conversations into a roundtable discussion that could be published in <em>Civil War History</em>. In part, Civil War history has been divorced from many critical conversations happening within African American studies about theory and method, so I wanted to create an interdisciplinary forum that would introduce Civil War historians to this conversation. When Rashauna, Rhae Lynn, and I discussed how to organize the conversation, we decided to select a primary source that we would all read and analyze based on our own scholarly orientations. We also thought this would be a good exercise for readers of the journal. They too could read the source and the accompanying roundtable and use it in their research or teaching.</p> <p>While there are endless sources that could serve as the bridge between African American studies and Civil War studies, I decided on Frances E. W. Harper’s 1892 novel, <em>Iola Leroy</em>, which chronicles the Black experience during the Civil War. Harper was born free to Black parents on September 24, 1825. She was a poet and devoted abolitionist before the Civil War. Decades afterward, she decided to write a novel that aimed to tell the many complicated stories of Black people during the war. While <em>Iola Leroy</em> received critical attention at the time of its publication, it faded from view outside of Black intellectual and feminist circles during the first half of the twentieth century.</p> <p>In the early 1980s, historian and literary critic Henry Louis Gates Jr. led a massive effort to recover and republish books written by Black women. Harper’s novel was often considered the first novel written by a Black woman, until Gates rediscovered Harriet Wilson’s 1859 novel, <em>Our Nig</em>.</p> <p>In keeping with the journal’s commitment to interdisciplinary studies, I invited Gates, an eminent scholar, to join our conversation. I also invited John Stauffer, a leading historian and literary critic, who is an expert in Civil War–era studies, nineteenth-century literature, and African American studies. We hosted the forum at Hutchins and invited Hutchins fellows to attend. Faith Smith, a literary critic who specializes in Caribbean literature, added comments throughout the conversation, and so did Nii Ayikwei Parkes, an award-winning Ghanaian-British writer. <strong>[End Page 66]</strong></p> <strong>JIM DOWNS:</strong> <p>I want to begin the conversation with asking each participant to reflect on when you first read <em>Iola Leroy</em> and what your impressions of the novel were. I also want the conversation to be organic, so please jump in at any point.</p> <p>I’m happy to begin. I read...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CIVIL WAR HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CIVIL WAR HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2023.a912509\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2023.a912509","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

代替摘要,这里是内容的简短摘录:作为档案的小说——弗朗西斯·e·w·哈珀1892年小说的圆桌会议,关于内战和重建的伊奥拉·勒罗伊吉姆·唐斯,编辑和主持人(传记),雷·林恩·巴恩斯(传记),小亨利·路易斯·盖茨(传记),拉绍纳·约翰逊(传记),约翰·斯托弗(传记),费斯·史密斯(传记),和Nii Ayikwei Parkes(传记)吉姆·唐斯:在过去的一年里,在哈佛大学哈钦斯非洲和非裔美国人研究中心,有很多关于为什么档案很重要的讨论。基于赛迪亚·哈特曼(Saidiya Hartman)的文章《两场中的维纳斯》(Venus in Two Acts)和她的书《失去你的母亲:大西洋奴隶路线之旅》、《不羁的生活,美丽的实验》和玛丽莎·j·富恩特斯(Marisa J. Fuentes)的《被剥夺的生活:被奴役的妇女,暴力和档案》的重要性,这些对话成为了人们关注的焦点,这些书提出了一个关键问题,即我们如何在传统档案中揭示被奴役和被压迫人民的生活虽然他们的批判性研究帮助我们中的许多人记住了塑造档案创建的意识形态力量,并提供了一个如何严格询问现存资源的模型,但我担心一些学者已经利用这种奖学金对档案研究变得悲观。我从哈特曼和富恩特斯那里学到的是如何更有创造性和批判性地思考如何解释现存的资料,而不是呼吁关闭档案研究。但我认为他们的工作现在被用来宣称黑人的主体性几乎不可能在传统档案中发现。在过去的一学年里,我在哈钦斯中心与拉肖纳·约翰逊和雷·林恩·巴恩斯共进午餐时讨论了这个问题,我们决定把我们的非正式谈话变成圆桌讨论,并将其发表在《内战历史》上。在某种程度上,南北战史已经脱离了许多非裔美国人研究中关于理论和方法的批判性对话,所以我想创建一个跨学科的论坛,将南北战史学家引入这一对话。当拉绍纳、雷·林恩和我讨论如何组织这次谈话时,我们决定选择一个主要的资料,我们都将根据自己的学术取向来阅读和分析。我们还认为这将是一个很好的练习,为读者的杂志。他们也可以阅读源代码和随附的圆桌会议,并在他们的研究或教学中使用它。虽然有无数的资料可以作为非裔美国人研究和内战研究之间的桥梁,但我决定阅读弗朗西斯·e·w·哈珀(Frances E. W. Harper) 1892年的小说《伊奥拉·勒罗伊》(Iola Leroy),这本小说记录了内战期间黑人的经历。哈珀于1825年9月24日出生,父母是黑人。内战前,她是一位诗人和坚定的废奴主义者。几十年后,她决定写一部小说,旨在讲述黑人在战争期间的许多复杂故事。虽然Iola Leroy在出版时受到了批评的关注,但在20世纪上半叶,它从黑人知识分子和女权主义圈子之外的视野中消失了。在20世纪80年代早期,历史学家和文学评论家小亨利·路易斯·盖茨(Henry Louis Gates Jr.)领导了一项巨大的努力,以恢复和重新出版黑人女性所写的书籍。哈珀的小说通常被认为是黑人女性写的第一部小说,直到盖茨重新发现了哈丽特·威尔逊1859年的小说《我们的夜晚》。为了与期刊对跨学科研究的承诺保持一致,我邀请了著名学者盖茨参加我们的谈话。我还邀请了约翰·斯托弗(John Stauffer),一位著名的历史学家和文学评论家,他是内战时期研究、19世纪文学和非裔美国人研究方面的专家。我们在哈钦斯大学举办了论坛,并邀请了哈钦斯大学的学者参加。专门研究加勒比海文学的文学评论家费思·史密斯(Faith Smith)在整个对话中都加入了评论,加纳裔英国获奖作家奈伊·阿伊克维·帕克斯(Nii Ayikwei Parkes)也加入了评论。吉姆·唐斯:我想让每个参与者回忆一下你第一次读伊奥拉·勒罗伊的时候,以及你对这部小说的印象。我也希望对话是有机的,所以请随时插话。我很高兴开始。我读了…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Novel as Archive: A Roundtable on Frances E. W. Harper's 1892 Novel, Iola Leroy, about the Civil War and Reconstruction
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • A Novel as ArchiveA Roundtable on Frances E. W. Harper’s 1892 Novel, Iola Leroy, about the Civil War and Reconstruction
  • Jim Downs, Editor and Moderator (bio), Rhae Lynn Barnes (bio), Henry Louis Gates Jr. (bio), Rashauna Johnson (bio), John Stauffer (bio), Faith Smith (bio), and Nii Ayikwei Parkes (bio)
JIM DOWNS:

Over the past year at the Hutchins Center for African and African American Research at Harvard University, there have been lots of discussions about why archives matter. These conversations have come into sharp focus based on the significance of Saidiya Hartman’s article “Venus in Two Acts” and her books Lose Your Mother: A Journey along the Atlantic Slave Route and Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiment and Marisa J. Fuentes’s Dispossessed Lives: Enslaved Women, Violence, and the Archive, which raise critical questions about how we can uncover the lives of enslaved and oppressed people in traditional archives.1 While their critical research has helped many of us remember the ideological forces that shaped the creation of archives and provided a model on how to rigorously interrogate surviving sources, I am afraid that some scholars have used this scholarship to become pessimistic about archival research. What I learned from Hartman and Fuentes [End Page 65] was how to think more creatively and critically about interpreting surviving sources, not a call designed to shut down archival research. But I think their work is now being used to claim that Black subjectivity is almost impossible to uncover in traditional archives. Over the past academic year at the Hutchins Center, I have had conversations over lunch with Rashauna Johnson and Rhae Lynn Barnes about this, and we decided to turn our informal conversations into a roundtable discussion that could be published in Civil War History. In part, Civil War history has been divorced from many critical conversations happening within African American studies about theory and method, so I wanted to create an interdisciplinary forum that would introduce Civil War historians to this conversation. When Rashauna, Rhae Lynn, and I discussed how to organize the conversation, we decided to select a primary source that we would all read and analyze based on our own scholarly orientations. We also thought this would be a good exercise for readers of the journal. They too could read the source and the accompanying roundtable and use it in their research or teaching.

While there are endless sources that could serve as the bridge between African American studies and Civil War studies, I decided on Frances E. W. Harper’s 1892 novel, Iola Leroy, which chronicles the Black experience during the Civil War. Harper was born free to Black parents on September 24, 1825. She was a poet and devoted abolitionist before the Civil War. Decades afterward, she decided to write a novel that aimed to tell the many complicated stories of Black people during the war. While Iola Leroy received critical attention at the time of its publication, it faded from view outside of Black intellectual and feminist circles during the first half of the twentieth century.

In the early 1980s, historian and literary critic Henry Louis Gates Jr. led a massive effort to recover and republish books written by Black women. Harper’s novel was often considered the first novel written by a Black woman, until Gates rediscovered Harriet Wilson’s 1859 novel, Our Nig.

In keeping with the journal’s commitment to interdisciplinary studies, I invited Gates, an eminent scholar, to join our conversation. I also invited John Stauffer, a leading historian and literary critic, who is an expert in Civil War–era studies, nineteenth-century literature, and African American studies. We hosted the forum at Hutchins and invited Hutchins fellows to attend. Faith Smith, a literary critic who specializes in Caribbean literature, added comments throughout the conversation, and so did Nii Ayikwei Parkes, an award-winning Ghanaian-British writer. [End Page 66]

JIM DOWNS:

I want to begin the conversation with asking each participant to reflect on when you first read Iola Leroy and what your impressions of the novel were. I also want the conversation to be organic, so please jump in at any point.

I’m happy to begin. I read...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Civil War History is the foremost scholarly journal of the sectional conflict in the United States, focusing on social, cultural, economic, political, and military issues from antebellum America through Reconstruction. Articles have featured research on slavery, abolitionism, women and war, Abraham Lincoln, fiction, national identity, and various aspects of the Northern and Southern military. Published quarterly in March, June, September, and December.
期刊最新文献
Contesting "the Insatiable Maw of Capital": Mine Workers' Struggles in the Civil War Era Contributors The Open-Shop Movement and the Long Shadow of Slavery, the Civil War, and Reconstruction Book Review Essay: After War and Emancipation, an Irrepressible Conflict "We Can Take Care of Ourselves Now": Establishing Independent Black Labor and Industry in Postwar Yorktown, Virginia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1