失业、非正式性与最优货币政策——交叉检验方法的评估

Wissem Boukraine, Hella Guerchi Mehri
{"title":"失业、非正式性与最优货币政策——交叉检验方法的评估","authors":"Wissem Boukraine, Hella Guerchi Mehri","doi":"10.1080/17520843.2022.2030887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>This paper evaluate, in terms of simulated welfare loss, the cross-checking of a DSGE model’s loss function with a simple Taylor rule as a monetary policy framework for a central bank unable to commit to a target. We focus on Tunisia as an emerging economy with challenging characteristics for this technique, mainly high involuntary unemployment and an important informal sector. Our results confirm the effectiveness of this technique and the policy implication we derive is the superiority of cross-checking over discretion as an optimal monetary policy framework when the central bank is unable to commit to a target.</p>","PeriodicalId":42943,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unemployment, informality and optimal monetary policy, an evaluation of the cross-checking approach\",\"authors\":\"Wissem Boukraine, Hella Guerchi Mehri\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17520843.2022.2030887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p><p>This paper evaluate, in terms of simulated welfare loss, the cross-checking of a DSGE model’s loss function with a simple Taylor rule as a monetary policy framework for a central bank unable to commit to a target. We focus on Tunisia as an emerging economy with challenging characteristics for this technique, mainly high involuntary unemployment and an important informal sector. Our results confirm the effectiveness of this technique and the policy implication we derive is the superiority of cross-checking over discretion as an optimal monetary policy framework when the central bank is unable to commit to a target.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17520843.2022.2030887\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17520843.2022.2030887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文从模拟福利损失的角度,评价了DSGE模型的损失函数与简单泰勒规则的交叉检验,作为中央银行无法承诺目标的货币政策框架。我们将重点放在突尼斯这个新兴经济体上,认为它具有对这种技术具有挑战性的特点,主要是高非自愿失业率和重要的非正规部门。我们的结果证实了这种技术的有效性,我们得出的政策含义是,当中央银行无法承诺实现目标时,交叉检查优于自由裁量权作为最优货币政策框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unemployment, informality and optimal monetary policy, an evaluation of the cross-checking approach

ABSTRACT

This paper evaluate, in terms of simulated welfare loss, the cross-checking of a DSGE model’s loss function with a simple Taylor rule as a monetary policy framework for a central bank unable to commit to a target. We focus on Tunisia as an emerging economy with challenging characteristics for this technique, mainly high involuntary unemployment and an important informal sector. Our results confirm the effectiveness of this technique and the policy implication we derive is the superiority of cross-checking over discretion as an optimal monetary policy framework when the central bank is unable to commit to a target.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
From swelling prices to shrinking sizes: evaluating the ripple effects of inflation and shrinkflation on the economic growth of BIPS countries Cyclical investment behaviour of investment funds: its heterogeneity and drivers Macroeconomic effect of NBFC default shock in India: a four-sector DSGE model Beyond symmetry: investigating the asymmetric impact of exchange rate misalignment on economic growth dynamics in Bangladesh Dynamic effects of fiscal consolidations on income inequality in Sub-Saharan African countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1