量化长期市场影响

Campbell R. Harvey,Anthony Ledford,Emidio Sciulli,Philipp Ustinov,Stefan Zohren
{"title":"量化长期市场影响","authors":"Campbell R. Harvey,Anthony Ledford,Emidio Sciulli,Philipp Ustinov,Stefan Zohren","doi":"10.3905/jpm.2021.1.324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Impact costs occur when large buy or sell orders move market prices. The measurement of these costs is crucial for the evaluation of potential trading strategies and the successful execution of systematic investment strategies. However, common approaches suffer from a type of myopia: impact is only measured for the current transaction. In many cases, orders are correlated, and the impact of the first order will affect the execution of future orders. The authors propose a new measure that quantifies the long-term effects of market impact: expected future flow shortfall (EFFS). Their method is both intuitive and straightforward to implement. Importantly, the EFFS method performs competitively with far more complex and data-hungry approaches. The method should be useful for both the evaluation of execution methods and the sizing of orders.","PeriodicalId":501547,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Portfolio Management","volume":"17 1","pages":"25-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Long-Term Market Impact\",\"authors\":\"Campbell R. Harvey,Anthony Ledford,Emidio Sciulli,Philipp Ustinov,Stefan Zohren\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jpm.2021.1.324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Impact costs occur when large buy or sell orders move market prices. The measurement of these costs is crucial for the evaluation of potential trading strategies and the successful execution of systematic investment strategies. However, common approaches suffer from a type of myopia: impact is only measured for the current transaction. In many cases, orders are correlated, and the impact of the first order will affect the execution of future orders. The authors propose a new measure that quantifies the long-term effects of market impact: expected future flow shortfall (EFFS). Their method is both intuitive and straightforward to implement. Importantly, the EFFS method performs competitively with far more complex and data-hungry approaches. The method should be useful for both the evaluation of execution methods and the sizing of orders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"25-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2021.1.324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2021.1.324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当大量买卖订单影响市场价格时,影响成本就产生了。这些成本的测量对于评估潜在的交易策略和系统投资策略的成功执行至关重要。然而,常见的方法存在一种短视的问题:只衡量当前事务的影响。在许多情况下,订单是相互关联的,第一个订单的影响将影响未来订单的执行。作者提出了一种量化市场影响长期影响的新方法:预期未来流量缺口(EFFS)。他们的方法既直观又易于实现。重要的是,EFFS方法与更复杂、更需要数据的方法相比具有竞争力。该方法对于执行方法的评估和订单的大小都很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantifying Long-Term Market Impact
Impact costs occur when large buy or sell orders move market prices. The measurement of these costs is crucial for the evaluation of potential trading strategies and the successful execution of systematic investment strategies. However, common approaches suffer from a type of myopia: impact is only measured for the current transaction. In many cases, orders are correlated, and the impact of the first order will affect the execution of future orders. The authors propose a new measure that quantifies the long-term effects of market impact: expected future flow shortfall (EFFS). Their method is both intuitive and straightforward to implement. Importantly, the EFFS method performs competitively with far more complex and data-hungry approaches. The method should be useful for both the evaluation of execution methods and the sizing of orders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interview with Ian Toner, CFA, of verus Diversification and Asset Allocation in the Post-COVID Era Amortizing Volatility across Private Capital Investments The Factor Edge: Optimized Private Debt Investing (Re)Balancing Act: The Interplay of Private and Public Assets in Dialing the Asset Allocation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1