推进数据公正研究与实践:综合文献综述

David Leslie, Michael Katell, Mhairi Aitken, Jatinder Singh, Morgan Briggs, Rosamund Powell, Cami Rincón, Thompson Chengeta, Abeba Birhane, Antonella Perini, Smera Jayadeva, Anjali Mazumder
{"title":"推进数据公正研究与实践:综合文献综述","authors":"David Leslie, Michael Katell, Mhairi Aitken, Jatinder Singh, Morgan Briggs, Rosamund Powell, Cami Rincón, Thompson Chengeta, Abeba Birhane, Antonella Perini, Smera Jayadeva, Anjali Mazumder","doi":"arxiv-2204.03090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Advancing Data Justice Research and Practice (ADJRP) project aims to\nwiden the lens of current thinking around data justice and to provide\nactionable resources that will help policymakers, practitioners, and impacted\ncommunities gain a broader understanding of what equitable, freedom-promoting,\nand rights-sustaining data collection, governance, and use should look like in\nincreasingly dynamic and global data innovation ecosystems. In this integrated\nliterature review we hope to lay the conceptual groundwork needed to support\nthis aspiration. The introduction motivates the broadening of data justice that\nis undertaken by the literature review which follows. First, we address how\ncertain limitations of the current study of data justice drive the need for a\nre-location of data justice research and practice. We map out the strengths and\nshortcomings of the contemporary state of the art and then elaborate on the\nchallenges faced by our own effort to broaden the data justice perspective in\nthe decolonial context. The body of the literature review covers seven thematic\nareas. For each theme, the ADJRP team has systematically collected and analysed\nkey texts in order to tell the critical empirical story of how existing social\nstructures and power dynamics present challenges to data justice and related\njustice fields. In each case, this critical empirical story is also\nsupplemented by the transformational story of how activists, policymakers, and\nacademics are challenging longstanding structures of inequity to advance social\njustice in data innovation ecosystems and adjacent areas of technological\npractice.","PeriodicalId":501533,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - General Literature","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing Data Justice Research and Practice: An Integrated Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"David Leslie, Michael Katell, Mhairi Aitken, Jatinder Singh, Morgan Briggs, Rosamund Powell, Cami Rincón, Thompson Chengeta, Abeba Birhane, Antonella Perini, Smera Jayadeva, Anjali Mazumder\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2204.03090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Advancing Data Justice Research and Practice (ADJRP) project aims to\\nwiden the lens of current thinking around data justice and to provide\\nactionable resources that will help policymakers, practitioners, and impacted\\ncommunities gain a broader understanding of what equitable, freedom-promoting,\\nand rights-sustaining data collection, governance, and use should look like in\\nincreasingly dynamic and global data innovation ecosystems. In this integrated\\nliterature review we hope to lay the conceptual groundwork needed to support\\nthis aspiration. The introduction motivates the broadening of data justice that\\nis undertaken by the literature review which follows. First, we address how\\ncertain limitations of the current study of data justice drive the need for a\\nre-location of data justice research and practice. We map out the strengths and\\nshortcomings of the contemporary state of the art and then elaborate on the\\nchallenges faced by our own effort to broaden the data justice perspective in\\nthe decolonial context. The body of the literature review covers seven thematic\\nareas. For each theme, the ADJRP team has systematically collected and analysed\\nkey texts in order to tell the critical empirical story of how existing social\\nstructures and power dynamics present challenges to data justice and related\\njustice fields. In each case, this critical empirical story is also\\nsupplemented by the transformational story of how activists, policymakers, and\\nacademics are challenging longstanding structures of inequity to advance social\\njustice in data innovation ecosystems and adjacent areas of technological\\npractice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - General Literature\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - General Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2204.03090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - General Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2204.03090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

推进数据正义研究与实践(ADJRP)项目旨在拓宽当前围绕数据正义的思考视角,并提供可操作的资源,帮助政策制定者、从业者和受影响的社区更广泛地了解公平、促进自由和维护权利的数据收集、治理和使用应该是一个日益动态的全球数据创新生态系统。在这篇综合文献综述中,我们希望为支持这一愿望奠定必要的概念基础。引言激发了数据正义的扩展,这是由下文的文献综述承担的。首先,我们讨论了当前数据公正研究的某些局限性如何推动了对数据公正研究和实践的需求。我们列出了当代技术的优势和不足,然后详细阐述了我们在非殖民化背景下扩大数据正义视角所面临的挑战。文献综述的主体包括七个主题。对于每个主题,ADJRP团队都系统地收集和分析了关键文本,以讲述现有社会结构和权力动态如何对数据正义和相关正义领域提出挑战的关键经验故事。在每一个案例中,这一批判性的经验故事也被活动家、政策制定者和学者如何挑战长期存在的不平等结构的转型故事所补充,以促进数据创新生态系统和相关技术实践领域的社会正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advancing Data Justice Research and Practice: An Integrated Literature Review
The Advancing Data Justice Research and Practice (ADJRP) project aims to widen the lens of current thinking around data justice and to provide actionable resources that will help policymakers, practitioners, and impacted communities gain a broader understanding of what equitable, freedom-promoting, and rights-sustaining data collection, governance, and use should look like in increasingly dynamic and global data innovation ecosystems. In this integrated literature review we hope to lay the conceptual groundwork needed to support this aspiration. The introduction motivates the broadening of data justice that is undertaken by the literature review which follows. First, we address how certain limitations of the current study of data justice drive the need for a re-location of data justice research and practice. We map out the strengths and shortcomings of the contemporary state of the art and then elaborate on the challenges faced by our own effort to broaden the data justice perspective in the decolonial context. The body of the literature review covers seven thematic areas. For each theme, the ADJRP team has systematically collected and analysed key texts in order to tell the critical empirical story of how existing social structures and power dynamics present challenges to data justice and related justice fields. In each case, this critical empirical story is also supplemented by the transformational story of how activists, policymakers, and academics are challenging longstanding structures of inequity to advance social justice in data innovation ecosystems and adjacent areas of technological practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A guideline for the methodology chapter in computer science dissertations Eternal Sunshine of the Mechanical Mind: The Irreconcilability of Machine Learning and the Right to be Forgotten A Comprehensive Overview of Fish-Eye Camera Distortion Correction Methods The 4+1 Model of Data Science Computational Natural Philosophy: A Thread from Presocratics through Turing to ChatGPT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1