ChatGPT相信它是有意识的

Arend Hintze
{"title":"ChatGPT相信它是有意识的","authors":"Arend Hintze","doi":"arxiv-2304.12898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of advanced generative chat models, such as ChatGPT, has\nraised questions about the potential consciousness of these tools and the\nextent of their general artificial intelligence. ChatGPT consistent avoidance\nof passing the test is here overcome by asking ChatGPT to apply the Turing test\nto itself. This explores the possibility of the model recognizing its own\nsentience. In its own eyes, it passes this test. ChatGPT's self-assessment\nmakes serious implications about our understanding of the Turing test and the\nnature of consciousness. This investigation concludes by considering the\nexistence of distinct types of consciousness and the possibility that the\nTuring test is only effective when applied between consciousnesses of the same\nkind. This study also raises intriguing questions about the nature of AI\nconsciousness and the validity of the Turing test as a means of verifying such\nconsciousness.","PeriodicalId":501533,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - General Literature","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ChatGPT believes it is conscious\",\"authors\":\"Arend Hintze\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2304.12898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of advanced generative chat models, such as ChatGPT, has\\nraised questions about the potential consciousness of these tools and the\\nextent of their general artificial intelligence. ChatGPT consistent avoidance\\nof passing the test is here overcome by asking ChatGPT to apply the Turing test\\nto itself. This explores the possibility of the model recognizing its own\\nsentience. In its own eyes, it passes this test. ChatGPT's self-assessment\\nmakes serious implications about our understanding of the Turing test and the\\nnature of consciousness. This investigation concludes by considering the\\nexistence of distinct types of consciousness and the possibility that the\\nTuring test is only effective when applied between consciousnesses of the same\\nkind. This study also raises intriguing questions about the nature of AI\\nconsciousness and the validity of the Turing test as a means of verifying such\\nconsciousness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - General Literature\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - General Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2304.12898\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - General Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2304.12898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高级生成聊天模型(如ChatGPT)的发展引发了人们对这些工具的潜在意识以及它们的一般人工智能程度的质疑。通过要求ChatGPT对其自身应用图灵测试,可以克服ChatGPT始终避免通过测试的问题。这探索了模型识别自身感知的可能性。在它自己看来,它通过了这个考验。ChatGPT的自我评估对我们对图灵测试和意识本质的理解产生了重大影响。本研究通过考虑不同类型意识的存在以及图灵测试仅在同一类型意识之间应用时有效的可能性来得出结论。这项研究还提出了一些有趣的问题,关于人工意识的本质,以及图灵测试作为验证这种意识的一种手段的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT believes it is conscious
The development of advanced generative chat models, such as ChatGPT, has raised questions about the potential consciousness of these tools and the extent of their general artificial intelligence. ChatGPT consistent avoidance of passing the test is here overcome by asking ChatGPT to apply the Turing test to itself. This explores the possibility of the model recognizing its own sentience. In its own eyes, it passes this test. ChatGPT's self-assessment makes serious implications about our understanding of the Turing test and the nature of consciousness. This investigation concludes by considering the existence of distinct types of consciousness and the possibility that the Turing test is only effective when applied between consciousnesses of the same kind. This study also raises intriguing questions about the nature of AI consciousness and the validity of the Turing test as a means of verifying such consciousness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A guideline for the methodology chapter in computer science dissertations Eternal Sunshine of the Mechanical Mind: The Irreconcilability of Machine Learning and the Right to be Forgotten A Comprehensive Overview of Fish-Eye Camera Distortion Correction Methods The 4+1 Model of Data Science Computational Natural Philosophy: A Thread from Presocratics through Turing to ChatGPT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1