Runge-Kutta 方法的形式验证舍入误差分析

IF 0.9 3区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Journal of Automated Reasoning Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1007/s10817-023-09686-y
Florian Faissole
{"title":"Runge-Kutta 方法的形式验证舍入误差分析","authors":"Florian Faissole","doi":"10.1007/s10817-023-09686-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Numerical errors are insidious, difficult to predict and inherent in different levels of critical systems design. Indeed, numerical algorithms generally constitute approximations of an ideal mathematical model, which itself constitutes an approximation of a physical reality which has undergone multiple measurement errors. To this are added rounding errors due to computer arithmetic implementations, often neglected even if they can significantly distort the results obtained. This applies to Runge–Kutta methods used for the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations, that are ubiquitous to model fundamental laws of physics, chemistry, biology or economy. We provide a Coq formalization of the rounding error analysis of Runge–Kutta methods applied to linear systems and implemented in floating-point arithmetic. We propose a generic methodology to build a bound on the error accumulated over the iterations, taking gradual underflow into account. We then instantiate this methodology for two classic Runge–Kutta methods, namely Euler and RK2. The formalization of the results include the definition of matrix norms, the proof of rounding error bounds of matrix operations and the formalization of the generic results and their applications on examples. In order to support the proposed approach, we provide numerical experiments on examples coming from nuclear physics applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Automated Reasoning","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formally-Verified Round-Off Error Analysis of Runge–Kutta Methods\",\"authors\":\"Florian Faissole\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10817-023-09686-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Numerical errors are insidious, difficult to predict and inherent in different levels of critical systems design. Indeed, numerical algorithms generally constitute approximations of an ideal mathematical model, which itself constitutes an approximation of a physical reality which has undergone multiple measurement errors. To this are added rounding errors due to computer arithmetic implementations, often neglected even if they can significantly distort the results obtained. This applies to Runge–Kutta methods used for the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations, that are ubiquitous to model fundamental laws of physics, chemistry, biology or economy. We provide a Coq formalization of the rounding error analysis of Runge–Kutta methods applied to linear systems and implemented in floating-point arithmetic. We propose a generic methodology to build a bound on the error accumulated over the iterations, taking gradual underflow into account. We then instantiate this methodology for two classic Runge–Kutta methods, namely Euler and RK2. The formalization of the results include the definition of matrix norms, the proof of rounding error bounds of matrix operations and the formalization of the generic results and their applications on examples. In order to support the proposed approach, we provide numerical experiments on examples coming from nuclear physics applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Automated Reasoning\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Automated Reasoning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-023-09686-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Automated Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-023-09686-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数值误差是隐蔽的、难以预测的,而且是不同层次的关键系统设计所固有的。事实上,数值算法通常是对理想数学模型的近似,而理想数学模型本身又是对经历了多重测量误差的物理现实的近似。此外,计算机运算实现过程中产生的舍入误差往往会被忽视,即使这些误差会严重扭曲所获得的结果。这适用于用于常微分方程数值积分的 Runge-Kutta 方法,常微分方程在模拟物理、化学、生物或经济的基本规律时无处不在。我们为应用于线性系统并以浮点运算实现的 Runge-Kutta 方法的舍入误差分析提供了 Coq 形式化。我们提出了一种通用方法,在考虑逐渐下溢的情况下,建立迭代累积误差的约束。然后,我们将这种方法应用于两种经典的 Runge-Kutta 方法,即欧拉和 RK2。结果的形式化包括矩阵规范的定义、矩阵运算舍入误差约束的证明、通用结果的形式化及其在实例中的应用。为了支持所提出的方法,我们提供了核物理应用实例的数值实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Formally-Verified Round-Off Error Analysis of Runge–Kutta Methods

Numerical errors are insidious, difficult to predict and inherent in different levels of critical systems design. Indeed, numerical algorithms generally constitute approximations of an ideal mathematical model, which itself constitutes an approximation of a physical reality which has undergone multiple measurement errors. To this are added rounding errors due to computer arithmetic implementations, often neglected even if they can significantly distort the results obtained. This applies to Runge–Kutta methods used for the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations, that are ubiquitous to model fundamental laws of physics, chemistry, biology or economy. We provide a Coq formalization of the rounding error analysis of Runge–Kutta methods applied to linear systems and implemented in floating-point arithmetic. We propose a generic methodology to build a bound on the error accumulated over the iterations, taking gradual underflow into account. We then instantiate this methodology for two classic Runge–Kutta methods, namely Euler and RK2. The formalization of the results include the definition of matrix norms, the proof of rounding error bounds of matrix operations and the formalization of the generic results and their applications on examples. In order to support the proposed approach, we provide numerical experiments on examples coming from nuclear physics applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Automated Reasoning
Journal of Automated Reasoning 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Automated Reasoning is an interdisciplinary journal that maintains a balance between theory, implementation and application. The spectrum of material published ranges from the presentation of a new inference rule with proof of its logical properties to a detailed account of a computer program designed to solve various problems in industry. The main fields covered are automated theorem proving, logic programming, expert systems, program synthesis and validation, artificial intelligence, computational logic, robotics, and various industrial applications. The papers share the common feature of focusing on several aspects of automated reasoning, a field whose objective is the design and implementation of a computer program that serves as an assistant in solving problems and in answering questions that require reasoning. The Journal of Automated Reasoning provides a forum and a means for exchanging information for those interested purely in theory, those interested primarily in implementation, and those interested in specific research and industrial applications.
期刊最新文献
Single-Set Cubical Categories and Their Formalisation with a Proof Assistant Towards a Scalable Proof Engine: A Performant Prototype Rewriting Primitive for Coq Verifying the Generalization of Deep Learning to Out-of-Distribution Domains Dependency Schemes in CDCL-Based QBF Solving: A Proof-Theoretic Study Verifying a Sequent Calculus Prover for First-Order Logic with Functions in Isabelle/HOL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1