包容性领导如何以及何时增强团队积极性：集体兴旺和团队权力距离的作用

IF 3.3 3区管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Personnel Review Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1108/pr-02-2022-0093

Lijing Zhao, Phillip M. Jolly, Shuming Zhao, Hao Zeng

{"title":"包容性领导如何以及何时增强团队积极性：集体兴旺和团队权力距离的作用","authors":"Lijing Zhao, Phillip M. Jolly, Shuming Zhao, Hao Zeng","doi":"10.1108/pr-02-2022-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The present study was conducted to investigate the relationship between team-level inclusive leadership perceptions, team thriving, and team proactivity as well as the moderating effect of team power distance on these relationships.</p>\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A two-wave survey study of 365 manufacturing employees comprising 85 teams in an organization in Eastern China was used to test the hypotheses.</p>\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings indicate that inclusive leadership stimulates collective thriving, which then promotes team proactivity. In addition, team power distance negatively moderates the relationship between inclusive leadership and collective thriving, as well as the indirect effect of inclusive leadership on team proactivity via collective thriving.</p>\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study is one of the first to investigate the effects of inclusive leadership at the team level, and answers recent calls to investigate the mechanisms linking leadership-related constructs to team-level proactivity. The authors also identify an important boundary condition to the effects of inclusive leadership in team power distance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48148,"journal":{"name":"Personnel Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How and when inclusive leadership enhances team proactivity: the roles of collective thriving and team power distance\",\"authors\":\"Lijing Zhao, Phillip M. Jolly, Shuming Zhao, Hao Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/pr-02-2022-0093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The present study was conducted to investigate the relationship between team-level inclusive leadership perceptions, team thriving, and team proactivity as well as the moderating effect of team power distance on these relationships.</p>\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>A two-wave survey study of 365 manufacturing employees comprising 85 teams in an organization in Eastern China was used to test the hypotheses.</p>\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The findings indicate that inclusive leadership stimulates collective thriving, which then promotes team proactivity. In addition, team power distance negatively moderates the relationship between inclusive leadership and collective thriving, as well as the indirect effect of inclusive leadership on team proactivity via collective thriving.</p>\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study is one of the first to investigate the effects of inclusive leadership at the team level, and answers recent calls to investigate the mechanisms linking leadership-related constructs to team-level proactivity. The authors also identify an important boundary condition to the effects of inclusive leadership in team power distance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personnel Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personnel Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-02-2022-0093\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personnel Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-02-2022-0093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨团队层面的包容性领导认知、团队蓬勃发展和团队积极主动之间的关系，以及团队权力距离对这些关系的调节作用。研究结果研究结果表明，包容性领导能激发集体蓬勃发展，进而促进团队积极主动。此外，团队权力距离对包容性领导与集体茁壮成长之间的关系以及包容性领导通过集体茁壮成长对团队积极性的间接影响起到了负向调节作用。作者还在团队权力距离中发现了包容性领导力效应的一个重要边界条件。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

How and when inclusive leadership enhances team proactivity: the roles of collective thriving and team power distance

Purpose

The present study was conducted to investigate the relationship between team-level inclusive leadership perceptions, team thriving, and team proactivity as well as the moderating effect of team power distance on these relationships.

Design/methodology/approach

A two-wave survey study of 365 manufacturing employees comprising 85 teams in an organization in Eastern China was used to test the hypotheses.

Findings

The findings indicate that inclusive leadership stimulates collective thriving, which then promotes team proactivity. In addition, team power distance negatively moderates the relationship between inclusive leadership and collective thriving, as well as the indirect effect of inclusive leadership on team proactivity via collective thriving.

Originality/value

This study is one of the first to investigate the effects of inclusive leadership at the team level, and answers recent calls to investigate the mechanisms linking leadership-related constructs to team-level proactivity. The authors also identify an important boundary condition to the effects of inclusive leadership in team power distance.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Personnel Review Multiple-

CiteScore

7.10

自引率

7.70%

发文量

133

期刊介绍： Personnel Review (PR) publishes rigorous, well written articles from a range of theoretical and methodological traditions. We value articles that have high originality and that engage with contemporary challenges to human resource management theory, policy and practice development. Research that highlights innovation and emerging issues in the field, and the medium- to long-term impact of HRM policy and practice, is especially welcome.