Christoph Nolte, Ana Reboredo Segovia, Jose Manuel Ochoa-Quintero, Jaime Burbano-Girón
{"title":"改进对热带生物多样性热点地区土地保护成本的估算","authors":"Christoph Nolte, Ana Reboredo Segovia, Jose Manuel Ochoa-Quintero, Jaime Burbano-Girón","doi":"10.1002/fee.2626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate estimates of the costs of land protection are useful for understanding where biodiversity conservation goals can be achieved at the lowest cost to society. However, because of the scarcity of high-quality cost maps for tropical countries, conservation planning studies often ignore cost or rely on untested proxies, such as agricultural rent or land-use intensity. Here, we show how analysts can estimate land protection costs using original data of public land acquisitions, global predictor datasets, and simple machine-learning models. For the Colombian Andes, a global biodiversity hotspot, we found that the principal driver of the cost of land protection is urban proximity, not agricultural rent. We derived cost estimates that predict public land protection costs more accurately than available cost proxies and identified new protection priorities for 143 threatened bird species. A more systematic collection of cost records of land protection will help inform public decisions on national and global biodiversity protection priorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2626","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving estimates of land protection costs in a tropical biodiversity hotspot\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Nolte, Ana Reboredo Segovia, Jose Manuel Ochoa-Quintero, Jaime Burbano-Girón\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fee.2626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate estimates of the costs of land protection are useful for understanding where biodiversity conservation goals can be achieved at the lowest cost to society. However, because of the scarcity of high-quality cost maps for tropical countries, conservation planning studies often ignore cost or rely on untested proxies, such as agricultural rent or land-use intensity. Here, we show how analysts can estimate land protection costs using original data of public land acquisitions, global predictor datasets, and simple machine-learning models. For the Colombian Andes, a global biodiversity hotspot, we found that the principal driver of the cost of land protection is urban proximity, not agricultural rent. We derived cost estimates that predict public land protection costs more accurately than available cost proxies and identified new protection priorities for 143 threatened bird species. A more systematic collection of cost records of land protection will help inform public decisions on national and global biodiversity protection priorities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2626\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2626\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2626","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving estimates of land protection costs in a tropical biodiversity hotspot
Accurate estimates of the costs of land protection are useful for understanding where biodiversity conservation goals can be achieved at the lowest cost to society. However, because of the scarcity of high-quality cost maps for tropical countries, conservation planning studies often ignore cost or rely on untested proxies, such as agricultural rent or land-use intensity. Here, we show how analysts can estimate land protection costs using original data of public land acquisitions, global predictor datasets, and simple machine-learning models. For the Colombian Andes, a global biodiversity hotspot, we found that the principal driver of the cost of land protection is urban proximity, not agricultural rent. We derived cost estimates that predict public land protection costs more accurately than available cost proxies and identified new protection priorities for 143 threatened bird species. A more systematic collection of cost records of land protection will help inform public decisions on national and global biodiversity protection priorities.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas.
The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available.
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.