乌克兰的黑人:对记录 2022 年俄乌战争爆发时试图逃离乌克兰的黑人所受歧视的 TikTok 视频的内容分析

I.I. Vincent Jones , Sungwoo Kim , Haoyang Tang , Zhiheng Liu
{"title":"乌克兰的黑人:对记录 2022 年俄乌战争爆发时试图逃离乌克兰的黑人所受歧视的 TikTok 视频的内容分析","authors":"I.I. Vincent Jones ,&nbsp;Sungwoo Kim ,&nbsp;Haoyang Tang ,&nbsp;Zhiheng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.dialog.2023.100161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted on in June 2022 reviewed 100 TikTok videos using the hashtag #africansinukriane that depicted discrimination against Black people attempting to flee Ukraine at the onset of the war in February 2022. Two of the 16 themes were significant and present in over 50% of videos: raising awareness (67%) and racial discrimination (64%). Videos with elements of physical contact (<em>N</em> = 16, 76.2%), violence (<em>N</em> = 12, 75%), and dehumanization (<em>N</em> = 11, 68.8%) had higher shares than overall media shares. Less than 10% of the videos included dark humor (8%), sharing helpful resources (7%), and appreciation of countries that offered support (5%). Results indicate that videos that include raising awareness (<em>p</em> = .02), racial discrimination (<em>p</em> = .001), on-scene clips or war scenes (<em>p</em> = .007), physical contact (<em>p</em> = .006), and denied entry (<em>p</em> = .022). Their estimated differences in locations indicate that all of these themes were related to higher median shares of the videos. This study supports that TikTok is a place where marginalized groups can raise awareness about injustice and create counternarratives. This study exemplifies international anti-blackness with implications for health marketing and communication, human rights efforts, refugee health, and targeted mental health and policy support for those displaced by war.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72803,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in health","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653323000655/pdfft?md5=39a620273b52e432e410e26080b29b75&pid=1-s2.0-S2772653323000655-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Black people in Ukraine: A content analysis of TikTok videos documenting discrimination against Black people attempting to flee at the onset of the 2022 Russo-Ukrainian war\",\"authors\":\"I.I. Vincent Jones ,&nbsp;Sungwoo Kim ,&nbsp;Haoyang Tang ,&nbsp;Zhiheng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dialog.2023.100161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted on in June 2022 reviewed 100 TikTok videos using the hashtag #africansinukriane that depicted discrimination against Black people attempting to flee Ukraine at the onset of the war in February 2022. Two of the 16 themes were significant and present in over 50% of videos: raising awareness (67%) and racial discrimination (64%). Videos with elements of physical contact (<em>N</em> = 16, 76.2%), violence (<em>N</em> = 12, 75%), and dehumanization (<em>N</em> = 11, 68.8%) had higher shares than overall media shares. Less than 10% of the videos included dark humor (8%), sharing helpful resources (7%), and appreciation of countries that offered support (5%). Results indicate that videos that include raising awareness (<em>p</em> = .02), racial discrimination (<em>p</em> = .001), on-scene clips or war scenes (<em>p</em> = .007), physical contact (<em>p</em> = .006), and denied entry (<em>p</em> = .022). Their estimated differences in locations indicate that all of these themes were related to higher median shares of the videos. This study supports that TikTok is a place where marginalized groups can raise awareness about injustice and create counternarratives. This study exemplifies international anti-blackness with implications for health marketing and communication, human rights efforts, refugee health, and targeted mental health and policy support for those displaced by war.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogues in health\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653323000655/pdfft?md5=39a620273b52e432e410e26080b29b75&pid=1-s2.0-S2772653323000655-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogues in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653323000655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653323000655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项横断面描述性研究于 2022 年 6 月进行,审查了 100 个使用 #africansinukriane 标签的 TikTok 视频,这些视频描述了 2022 年 2 月战争爆发时试图逃离乌克兰的黑人受到的歧视。在 16 个主题中,有两个主题非常重要,出现在 50%以上的视频中:提高认识(67%)和种族歧视(64%)。包含身体接触(16 个,占 76.2%)、暴力(12 个,占 75%)和非人化(11 个,占 68.8%)元素的视频所占份额高于整体媒体份额。只有不到 10%的视频包含黑色幽默(8%)、分享有用资源(7%)和对提供支持的国家表示感谢(5%)。结果表明,包括提高认识(p = 0.02)、种族歧视(p = 0.001)、现场剪辑或战争场面(p = 0.007)、身体接触(p = 0.006)和拒绝入境(p = 0.022)的视频。它们在位置上的估计差异表明,所有这些主题都与视频的中位数份额较高有关。这项研究证明,TikTok 是边缘化群体提高对不公正现象的认识并创造反叙述的地方。本研究体现了国际反黑现象,对健康营销和传播、人权工作、难民健康以及针对因战争而流离失所者的心理健康和政策支持具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Black people in Ukraine: A content analysis of TikTok videos documenting discrimination against Black people attempting to flee at the onset of the 2022 Russo-Ukrainian war

This cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted on in June 2022 reviewed 100 TikTok videos using the hashtag #africansinukriane that depicted discrimination against Black people attempting to flee Ukraine at the onset of the war in February 2022. Two of the 16 themes were significant and present in over 50% of videos: raising awareness (67%) and racial discrimination (64%). Videos with elements of physical contact (N = 16, 76.2%), violence (N = 12, 75%), and dehumanization (N = 11, 68.8%) had higher shares than overall media shares. Less than 10% of the videos included dark humor (8%), sharing helpful resources (7%), and appreciation of countries that offered support (5%). Results indicate that videos that include raising awareness (p = .02), racial discrimination (p = .001), on-scene clips or war scenes (p = .007), physical contact (p = .006), and denied entry (p = .022). Their estimated differences in locations indicate that all of these themes were related to higher median shares of the videos. This study supports that TikTok is a place where marginalized groups can raise awareness about injustice and create counternarratives. This study exemplifies international anti-blackness with implications for health marketing and communication, human rights efforts, refugee health, and targeted mental health and policy support for those displaced by war.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogues in health
Dialogues in health Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Beyond antiretroviral treatment: Health-related quality of life of patients receiving antiretroviral treatment at a tertiary hospital in South Africa Modeling environmental interactions and collaborative interventions for childhood stunting: A case from Indonesia The overlooked burden: Vaginismus and its greater prevalence in eastern women Incidence rates of prediabetes and diabetes associated with sedentary behavior and night shifts among peruvian workers (2014–2021) Impact of Heat on Human and Animal Health in India: A Landscape Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1