免疫检查点抑制剂治疗 SCLC 患者原有自身抗体的临床影响:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究

Yuki Sato MD , Satoru Fujiwara MD , Akito Hata MD , Yoko Kida MD , Takahiro Masuda MD , Hisanori Amimoto MD , Hirotaka Matsumoto MD , Kotoko Miyoshi MD , Kojiro Otsuka MD, PhD , Keisuke Tomii MD, PhD
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂治疗 SCLC 患者原有自身抗体的临床影响:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Yuki Sato MD ,&nbsp;Satoru Fujiwara MD ,&nbsp;Akito Hata MD ,&nbsp;Yoko Kida MD ,&nbsp;Takahiro Masuda MD ,&nbsp;Hisanori Amimoto MD ,&nbsp;Hirotaka Matsumoto MD ,&nbsp;Kotoko Miyoshi MD ,&nbsp;Kojiro Otsuka MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Keisuke Tomii MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Although pretreatment autoantibodies have been associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment efficacy in some types of cancer, their importance has not been evaluated in patients with SCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted on a total of 52 patients with extensive-disease SCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment at either of the six participating centers in Japan. Pretreatment serum samples were collected and analyzed for autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid). Moreover, 12 antineuronal antibodies (AMPH, CV2, PNMA2, Ri, Yo, Hu, Recoverin, SOX1, Titin, Zic4, GAD65, and Tr) were analyzed using immunoblot assays. The primary end point was the incidence of irAEs with or without autoantibodies. The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on the basis of the presence or absence of autoantibodies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>PFS and OS were 4.4 and 25.3 months, respectively. Autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid antibodies) were detected in 29 patients (56%). In total, irAEs were observed in 18 patients (35%); irAE incidence was 48% in the autoantibody-positive group and 17% in the autoantibody-negative group (<em>p</em> = 0.039). There was no difference in PFS or OS between patients with and without autoantibodies (4.4 mo versus 4.6 mo, <em>p</em> = 0.36; 15.3 mo versus 18.2 mo, <em>p</em> = 0.36). Antineuronal antibodies were detected in 16 patients (31%). However, the development of neurologic irAEs was not observed in both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Vigilance is required against the development of irAEs in pretreatment antibody-positive patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364323001510/pdfft?md5=eee6b503312bda68f42335a8bfe68ff8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666364323001510-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Impact of Pre-Existing Autoantibodies in Patients With SCLC Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Sato MD ,&nbsp;Satoru Fujiwara MD ,&nbsp;Akito Hata MD ,&nbsp;Yoko Kida MD ,&nbsp;Takahiro Masuda MD ,&nbsp;Hisanori Amimoto MD ,&nbsp;Hirotaka Matsumoto MD ,&nbsp;Kotoko Miyoshi MD ,&nbsp;Kojiro Otsuka MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Keisuke Tomii MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Although pretreatment autoantibodies have been associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment efficacy in some types of cancer, their importance has not been evaluated in patients with SCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted on a total of 52 patients with extensive-disease SCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment at either of the six participating centers in Japan. Pretreatment serum samples were collected and analyzed for autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid). Moreover, 12 antineuronal antibodies (AMPH, CV2, PNMA2, Ri, Yo, Hu, Recoverin, SOX1, Titin, Zic4, GAD65, and Tr) were analyzed using immunoblot assays. The primary end point was the incidence of irAEs with or without autoantibodies. The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on the basis of the presence or absence of autoantibodies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>PFS and OS were 4.4 and 25.3 months, respectively. Autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid antibodies) were detected in 29 patients (56%). In total, irAEs were observed in 18 patients (35%); irAE incidence was 48% in the autoantibody-positive group and 17% in the autoantibody-negative group (<em>p</em> = 0.039). There was no difference in PFS or OS between patients with and without autoantibodies (4.4 mo versus 4.6 mo, <em>p</em> = 0.36; 15.3 mo versus 18.2 mo, <em>p</em> = 0.36). Antineuronal antibodies were detected in 16 patients (31%). However, the development of neurologic irAEs was not observed in both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Vigilance is required against the development of irAEs in pretreatment antibody-positive patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364323001510/pdfft?md5=eee6b503312bda68f42335a8bfe68ff8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666364323001510-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364323001510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364323001510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法:在日本的六个参与中心中的任一中心,对接受免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗作为一线治疗的52例广泛病变SCLC患者进行了一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。研究人员收集了治疗前的血清样本,并对其自身抗体(类风湿因子、抗核抗体和抗甲状腺抗体)进行了分析。此外,还使用免疫印迹法分析了 12 种抗神经元抗体(AMPH、CV2、PNMA2、Ri、Yo、Hu、Recoverin、SOX1、Titin、Zic4、GAD65 和 Tr)。主要终点是伴有或不伴有自身抗体的虹膜AE发生率。次要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),以是否存在自身抗体为依据。29名患者(56%)检测出自身抗体(类风湿因子、抗核抗体和抗甲状腺抗体)。总共有18名患者(35%)出现了虹膜不良反应;自身抗体阳性组的虹膜不良反应发生率为48%,自身抗体阴性组为17%(P = 0.039)。有自身抗体和无自身抗体患者的 PFS 或 OS 无差异(4.4 个月对 4.6 个月,p = 0.36;15.3 个月对 18.2 个月,p = 0.36)。16名患者(31%)检测到抗神经元抗体。结论需要警惕治疗前抗体阳性患者出现虹膜睫状体异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Impact of Pre-Existing Autoantibodies in Patients With SCLC Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

Introduction

Although pretreatment autoantibodies have been associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment efficacy in some types of cancer, their importance has not been evaluated in patients with SCLC.

Methods

A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted on a total of 52 patients with extensive-disease SCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment at either of the six participating centers in Japan. Pretreatment serum samples were collected and analyzed for autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid). Moreover, 12 antineuronal antibodies (AMPH, CV2, PNMA2, Ri, Yo, Hu, Recoverin, SOX1, Titin, Zic4, GAD65, and Tr) were analyzed using immunoblot assays. The primary end point was the incidence of irAEs with or without autoantibodies. The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on the basis of the presence or absence of autoantibodies.

Results

PFS and OS were 4.4 and 25.3 months, respectively. Autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid antibodies) were detected in 29 patients (56%). In total, irAEs were observed in 18 patients (35%); irAE incidence was 48% in the autoantibody-positive group and 17% in the autoantibody-negative group (p = 0.039). There was no difference in PFS or OS between patients with and without autoantibodies (4.4 mo versus 4.6 mo, p = 0.36; 15.3 mo versus 18.2 mo, p = 0.36). Antineuronal antibodies were detected in 16 patients (31%). However, the development of neurologic irAEs was not observed in both groups.

Conclusions

Vigilance is required against the development of irAEs in pretreatment antibody-positive patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Radiotherapy Improves Survival in NSCLC After Oligoprogression on Immunotherapy: A Cohort Study Analysis of Baseline Molecular Factors Associated With the Risk of Central Nervous System Progression Among Alectinib-Treated Patients With ALK–Positive NSCLC Regarding: “Olloni A, et al. Heart and Lung Dose as Predictors of Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Lung Cancer. A National Multicenter Study” Synchronous Oligometastasis and Oligoprogression as a Prognostic Marker in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC Treated With a Combination of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor and Chemotherapy (HOT2301) The Whole Picture of First-Line Osimertinib for EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced NSCLC: Real-World Efficacy, Safety, Progression Pattern, and Posttreatment Therapy (Reiwa Study)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1