自动驾驶的运动病对策:趋势和未来方向

Q1 Engineering Transportation Engineering Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.treng.2023.100220
Eduarda Pereira , Helena Macedo , Isabel C. Lisboa , Emanuel Sousa , Dário Machado , Emanuel Silva , Vitor Coelho , Pedro Arezes , Nélson Costa
{"title":"自动驾驶的运动病对策:趋势和未来方向","authors":"Eduarda Pereira ,&nbsp;Helena Macedo ,&nbsp;Isabel C. Lisboa ,&nbsp;Emanuel Sousa ,&nbsp;Dário Machado ,&nbsp;Emanuel Silva ,&nbsp;Vitor Coelho ,&nbsp;Pedro Arezes ,&nbsp;Nélson Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.treng.2023.100220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Motion Sickness (MS) remains a paramount concern in the evolving landscape of autonomous vehicles. As automation continues to reshape the passenger-vehicle interaction paradigm, the proliferation of diverse in-vehicle systems empowers passengers to disengage from the driving task. However, this new paradigm comes with the potential cost of exacerbating MS inside the car.</p><p>In this work, we intended to: (1) present and review available countermeasures to prevent or mitigate MS, found in the literature, that could also be implemented inside a car; (2) identify current trends and gaps in countermeasures to MS; and (3) suggest future avenues of research for potential use-cases aiming to mitigate MS in autonomous driving.</p><p>Through a comprehensive review of 65 publications, spanning from 2009 to 2023, we have organized existing literature into three distinctive categories and ten subcategories: (1) Vehicle-Centric Adaptation (Adaptation to Surface, Best Route ad Driving Style Adaptation), (2) In-Car Design and Environment (Design Guidelines for Seats, for Displays, for Windows and Climate Control), and (3) Sensory Cues (Visual, Haptic Audio and Olfactory Cues).</p><p>Our findings suggest that Visual Cues and Motion Planning are the two strongest trends in MS countermeasures. In contrast, Olfactory Cues are the least studied approach. Our results also substantiate the viability of multimodal approaches as a promising solution for passengers in autonomous vehicles. The simultaneous application of various countermeasures might hold potential in mitigating MS effectively.</p><p>As autonomous vehicles advance, these findings offer a strong basis for future research to decrease passenger's motion sickness and improve their well-being, safety, and comfort inside the car.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34480,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Engineering","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X2300060X/pdfft?md5=451748d2fc356a129c1500dd6be3fba3&pid=1-s2.0-S2666691X2300060X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motion sickness countermeasures for autonomous driving: Trends and future directions\",\"authors\":\"Eduarda Pereira ,&nbsp;Helena Macedo ,&nbsp;Isabel C. Lisboa ,&nbsp;Emanuel Sousa ,&nbsp;Dário Machado ,&nbsp;Emanuel Silva ,&nbsp;Vitor Coelho ,&nbsp;Pedro Arezes ,&nbsp;Nélson Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.treng.2023.100220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Motion Sickness (MS) remains a paramount concern in the evolving landscape of autonomous vehicles. As automation continues to reshape the passenger-vehicle interaction paradigm, the proliferation of diverse in-vehicle systems empowers passengers to disengage from the driving task. However, this new paradigm comes with the potential cost of exacerbating MS inside the car.</p><p>In this work, we intended to: (1) present and review available countermeasures to prevent or mitigate MS, found in the literature, that could also be implemented inside a car; (2) identify current trends and gaps in countermeasures to MS; and (3) suggest future avenues of research for potential use-cases aiming to mitigate MS in autonomous driving.</p><p>Through a comprehensive review of 65 publications, spanning from 2009 to 2023, we have organized existing literature into three distinctive categories and ten subcategories: (1) Vehicle-Centric Adaptation (Adaptation to Surface, Best Route ad Driving Style Adaptation), (2) In-Car Design and Environment (Design Guidelines for Seats, for Displays, for Windows and Climate Control), and (3) Sensory Cues (Visual, Haptic Audio and Olfactory Cues).</p><p>Our findings suggest that Visual Cues and Motion Planning are the two strongest trends in MS countermeasures. In contrast, Olfactory Cues are the least studied approach. Our results also substantiate the viability of multimodal approaches as a promising solution for passengers in autonomous vehicles. The simultaneous application of various countermeasures might hold potential in mitigating MS effectively.</p><p>As autonomous vehicles advance, these findings offer a strong basis for future research to decrease passenger's motion sickness and improve their well-being, safety, and comfort inside the car.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Engineering\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X2300060X/pdfft?md5=451748d2fc356a129c1500dd6be3fba3&pid=1-s2.0-S2666691X2300060X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X2300060X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X2300060X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在不断发展的自动驾驶汽车领域,晕车(MS)仍然是一个最令人担忧的问题。随着自动驾驶不断重塑乘客与车辆的互动模式,各种车载系统的普及使乘客能够脱离驾驶任务。然而,这一新模式的潜在代价是加剧车内的 MS:(在这项工作中,我们的目的是:(1)介绍和回顾文献中发现的可在车内实施的预防或减轻多发性硬化症的现有对策;(2)确定多发性硬化症对策的当前趋势和差距;以及(3)为旨在减轻自动驾驶中多发性硬化症的潜在用例提出未来的研究途径。通过对 2009 年至 2023 年发表的 65 篇文献进行全面审查,我们将现有文献分为三个不同类别和十个子类别:(1) 以车辆为中心的适应(适应路面、最佳路线和驾驶风格适应),(2) 车内设计和环境(座椅、显示器、车窗和气候控制的设计指南),以及 (3) 感官线索(视觉、触觉音频和嗅觉线索)。相比之下,嗅觉线索是研究最少的方法。我们的研究结果还证明了多模态方法作为自动驾驶汽车乘客解决方案的可行性。随着自动驾驶汽车的发展,这些发现为未来的研究提供了坚实的基础,以减少乘客的晕车症状,提高他们在车内的幸福感、安全性和舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Motion sickness countermeasures for autonomous driving: Trends and future directions

Motion Sickness (MS) remains a paramount concern in the evolving landscape of autonomous vehicles. As automation continues to reshape the passenger-vehicle interaction paradigm, the proliferation of diverse in-vehicle systems empowers passengers to disengage from the driving task. However, this new paradigm comes with the potential cost of exacerbating MS inside the car.

In this work, we intended to: (1) present and review available countermeasures to prevent or mitigate MS, found in the literature, that could also be implemented inside a car; (2) identify current trends and gaps in countermeasures to MS; and (3) suggest future avenues of research for potential use-cases aiming to mitigate MS in autonomous driving.

Through a comprehensive review of 65 publications, spanning from 2009 to 2023, we have organized existing literature into three distinctive categories and ten subcategories: (1) Vehicle-Centric Adaptation (Adaptation to Surface, Best Route ad Driving Style Adaptation), (2) In-Car Design and Environment (Design Guidelines for Seats, for Displays, for Windows and Climate Control), and (3) Sensory Cues (Visual, Haptic Audio and Olfactory Cues).

Our findings suggest that Visual Cues and Motion Planning are the two strongest trends in MS countermeasures. In contrast, Olfactory Cues are the least studied approach. Our results also substantiate the viability of multimodal approaches as a promising solution for passengers in autonomous vehicles. The simultaneous application of various countermeasures might hold potential in mitigating MS effectively.

As autonomous vehicles advance, these findings offer a strong basis for future research to decrease passenger's motion sickness and improve their well-being, safety, and comfort inside the car.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Engineering
Transportation Engineering Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
90 days
期刊最新文献
Using sensing, statistical, and numerical analysis approaches to evaluate the effect of temperature change on the resilient performance of highway pavements Effect of aging kinetics on the fatigue behavior of asphalt mixtures incorporating various RAP contents Analysis of electric vehicle charging behaviour in existing regional public and workplace charging infrastructure: A case study in the North-East UK Effect of clay materials on phase separation in plastic bag waste-modified bitumen during high-temperature storage Low-budget equipment facilitating skid coefficient extraction for traffic accident analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1