儿科医生在新生儿足跟穿刺时评估疼痛的视线焦点

IF 1.4 Q3 PEDIATRICS Revista Paulista De Pediatria Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2023089
Erica Souza Silva, Marina C. M. Barros, Julia Baptista Lopes Borten, L. Carlini, R. Balda, R. Orsi, T. Heiderich, C. Thomaz, R. Guinsburg
{"title":"儿科医生在新生儿足跟穿刺时评估疼痛的视线焦点","authors":"Erica Souza Silva, Marina C. M. Barros, Julia Baptista Lopes Borten, L. Carlini, R. Balda, R. Orsi, T. Heiderich, C. Thomaz, R. Guinsburg","doi":"10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2023089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the focus of pediatricians’ gaze during the heel prick of neonates. Methods: Prospective study in which pediatricians wearing eye tracker glasses evaluated neonatal pain before/after a heel prtick. Pediatricians scored the pain they perceived in the neonate in a verbal analogue numerical scale (0=no pain; 10=maximum pain). The outcomes measured were number and time of visual fixations in upper face, lower face, and hands, in two 10-second periods, before (pre) and after the puncture (post). These outcomes were compared between the periods, and according to pediatricians’ pain perception: absent/mild (score: 0–5) and moderate/intense (score: 6–10). Results: 24 pediatricians (31 years old, 92% female) evaluated 24 neonates. The median score attributed to neonatal pain during the heel prick was 7.0 (Interquartile range: 5–8). Compared to pre-, in the post-periods, more pediatricians fixed their gaze on the lower face (63 vs. 92%; p=0.036) and the number of visual fixations was greater on the lower face (2.0 vs. 5.0; p=0.018). There was no difference in the number and time of visual fixations according to the intensity of pain. Conclusions: At bedside, pediatricians change their focus of attention on the neonatal face after a painful procedure, focusing mainly on the lower part of the face.","PeriodicalId":21311,"journal":{"name":"Revista Paulista De Pediatria","volume":"11 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatricians’ focus of sight at pain assessment during a neonatal heel puncture\",\"authors\":\"Erica Souza Silva, Marina C. M. Barros, Julia Baptista Lopes Borten, L. Carlini, R. Balda, R. Orsi, T. Heiderich, C. Thomaz, R. Guinsburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2023089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the focus of pediatricians’ gaze during the heel prick of neonates. Methods: Prospective study in which pediatricians wearing eye tracker glasses evaluated neonatal pain before/after a heel prtick. Pediatricians scored the pain they perceived in the neonate in a verbal analogue numerical scale (0=no pain; 10=maximum pain). The outcomes measured were number and time of visual fixations in upper face, lower face, and hands, in two 10-second periods, before (pre) and after the puncture (post). These outcomes were compared between the periods, and according to pediatricians’ pain perception: absent/mild (score: 0–5) and moderate/intense (score: 6–10). Results: 24 pediatricians (31 years old, 92% female) evaluated 24 neonates. The median score attributed to neonatal pain during the heel prick was 7.0 (Interquartile range: 5–8). Compared to pre-, in the post-periods, more pediatricians fixed their gaze on the lower face (63 vs. 92%; p=0.036) and the number of visual fixations was greater on the lower face (2.0 vs. 5.0; p=0.018). There was no difference in the number and time of visual fixations according to the intensity of pain. Conclusions: At bedside, pediatricians change their focus of attention on the neonatal face after a painful procedure, focusing mainly on the lower part of the face.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Paulista De Pediatria\",\"volume\":\"11 42\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Paulista De Pediatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2023089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Paulista De Pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2023089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】目的:评价儿科医生在新生儿刺足时的注视焦点。方法:前瞻性研究中,儿科医生戴眼动仪眼镜评估新生儿疼痛前后脚跟戳。儿科医生用语言模拟数值量表对他们在新生儿身上感受到的疼痛进行评分(0=无疼痛;10 =最大痛苦)。测量结果是在穿刺前(前)和穿刺后(后)两个10秒的时间内,上脸、下脸和手的视觉注视次数和时间。根据儿科医生的疼痛感知,将这些结果进行比较:无/轻度(评分:0-5)和中度/强烈(评分:6-10)。结果:24名儿科医生(31岁,92%为女性)对24名新生儿进行了评估。新生儿足跟刺痛的中位评分为7.0(四分位数范围:5-8)。与孕前相比,在产后,更多的儿科医生将目光集中在下脸(63% vs. 92%;P =0.036),下面部的视觉固定次数更多(2.0 vs. 5.0;p = 0.018)。根据疼痛的强度,视觉注视的次数和时间没有差异。结论:在床边,儿科医生对新生儿手术后面部的关注焦点发生了变化,主要集中在面部的下半部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pediatricians’ focus of sight at pain assessment during a neonatal heel puncture
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the focus of pediatricians’ gaze during the heel prick of neonates. Methods: Prospective study in which pediatricians wearing eye tracker glasses evaluated neonatal pain before/after a heel prtick. Pediatricians scored the pain they perceived in the neonate in a verbal analogue numerical scale (0=no pain; 10=maximum pain). The outcomes measured were number and time of visual fixations in upper face, lower face, and hands, in two 10-second periods, before (pre) and after the puncture (post). These outcomes were compared between the periods, and according to pediatricians’ pain perception: absent/mild (score: 0–5) and moderate/intense (score: 6–10). Results: 24 pediatricians (31 years old, 92% female) evaluated 24 neonates. The median score attributed to neonatal pain during the heel prick was 7.0 (Interquartile range: 5–8). Compared to pre-, in the post-periods, more pediatricians fixed their gaze on the lower face (63 vs. 92%; p=0.036) and the number of visual fixations was greater on the lower face (2.0 vs. 5.0; p=0.018). There was no difference in the number and time of visual fixations according to the intensity of pain. Conclusions: At bedside, pediatricians change their focus of attention on the neonatal face after a painful procedure, focusing mainly on the lower part of the face.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Paulista De Pediatria
Revista Paulista De Pediatria Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Paulista de Pediatria publishes original contributions, case reports and review of clinical research with methodological approach in the areas of health and disease of neonates, infants, children and adolescents. The objective is to disseminate research with methodological quality on issues that comprise the health of children and adolescents. All articles are freely available online, via SciELO. Its abbreviated title is Rev. Paul. Pediatr., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
Pediatricians’ focus of sight at pain assessment during a neonatal heel puncture Respiratory system parameters in children with low severity cystic fibrosis: is there early involvement in relation to healthy peers? Assessment of maternal knowledge of solar exposure and vitamin D in the neonatal period Patau and Edwards Syndromes in a University Hospital: beyond palliative care Acute exogenous intoxications in childhood: factors related to hospitalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1