容积分析:重新思考脑转移瘤反应评估

B. Ocaña-Tienda, J. Pérez-Beteta, J. A. Romero-Rosales, B. Asenjo, A. Ortiz de Mendivil, Luis Alberto Pérez Romasanta, Jose David Albillo Labarra, Fátima Nagib, María Vidal Denis, B. Luque, Estanislao Arana, Víctor M. Pérez-García
{"title":"容积分析:重新思考脑转移瘤反应评估","authors":"B. Ocaña-Tienda, J. Pérez-Beteta, J. A. Romero-Rosales, B. Asenjo, A. Ortiz de Mendivil, Luis Alberto Pérez Romasanta, Jose David Albillo Labarra, Fátima Nagib, María Vidal Denis, B. Luque, Estanislao Arana, Víctor M. Pérez-García","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdad161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology for Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria are the gold standard for assessing brain metastases (BMs) treatment response. However, they are limited by their reliance on one dimension, despite the routine use of high-resolution T1-weighted MRI scans for BMs, which allows for 3D measurements. Our study aimed to investigate whether volumetric measurements could improve the response assessment in patients with BMs.\n \n \n \n We retrospectively evaluated a dataset comprising 783 BMs and analyzed the response of 185 of them from 132 patients who underwent stereotactic radiotherapy between 2007 and 2021 at five hospitals. We used T1-weighted MRIs to compute the volume of the lesions. For the volumetric criteria, progressive disease was defined as at least a 30% increase in volume, and partial response was characterized by a 20% volume reduction.\n \n \n \n Our study showed that the proposed volumetric criteria outperformed the RANO-BM criteria in several aspects: 1) Evaluating every lesion, while RANO-BM failed to evaluate 9.2% of them. 2) Classifying response effectively in 140 lesions, compared to only 72 lesions classified by RANO-BM. 3) Identifying BM recurrences a median of 3.3 months earlier than RANO-BM criteria.\n \n \n \n Our study demonstrates the superiority of volumetric criteria in improving the response assessment of BMs compared to the RANO-BM criteria. Our proposed criteria allow for evaluation of every lesion, regardless of its size or shape, better classification, and enable earlier identification of progressive disease. Volumetric criteria provide a standardized, reliable, and objective tool for assessing treatment response.\n","PeriodicalId":19138,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology Advances","volume":"5 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volumetric Analysis: Rethinking Brain Metastases Response Assessment\",\"authors\":\"B. Ocaña-Tienda, J. Pérez-Beteta, J. A. Romero-Rosales, B. Asenjo, A. Ortiz de Mendivil, Luis Alberto Pérez Romasanta, Jose David Albillo Labarra, Fátima Nagib, María Vidal Denis, B. Luque, Estanislao Arana, Víctor M. Pérez-García\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/noajnl/vdad161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology for Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria are the gold standard for assessing brain metastases (BMs) treatment response. However, they are limited by their reliance on one dimension, despite the routine use of high-resolution T1-weighted MRI scans for BMs, which allows for 3D measurements. Our study aimed to investigate whether volumetric measurements could improve the response assessment in patients with BMs.\\n \\n \\n \\n We retrospectively evaluated a dataset comprising 783 BMs and analyzed the response of 185 of them from 132 patients who underwent stereotactic radiotherapy between 2007 and 2021 at five hospitals. We used T1-weighted MRIs to compute the volume of the lesions. For the volumetric criteria, progressive disease was defined as at least a 30% increase in volume, and partial response was characterized by a 20% volume reduction.\\n \\n \\n \\n Our study showed that the proposed volumetric criteria outperformed the RANO-BM criteria in several aspects: 1) Evaluating every lesion, while RANO-BM failed to evaluate 9.2% of them. 2) Classifying response effectively in 140 lesions, compared to only 72 lesions classified by RANO-BM. 3) Identifying BM recurrences a median of 3.3 months earlier than RANO-BM criteria.\\n \\n \\n \\n Our study demonstrates the superiority of volumetric criteria in improving the response assessment of BMs compared to the RANO-BM criteria. Our proposed criteria allow for evaluation of every lesion, regardless of its size or shape, better classification, and enable earlier identification of progressive disease. Volumetric criteria provide a standardized, reliable, and objective tool for assessing treatment response.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":19138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology Advances\",\"volume\":\"5 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经肿瘤学脑转移反应评估(RANO-BM)标准是评估脑转移治疗反应的金标准。然而,尽管常规使用高分辨率t1加权MRI扫描脑转移,但它们受限于对一维的依赖,这允许三维测量。我们的研究旨在探讨体积测量是否可以改善脑转移患者的反应评估。我们回顾性评估了包含783例脑转移的数据集,并分析了2007年至2021年期间在五家医院接受立体定向放疗的132例患者中185例脑转移的反应。我们使用t1加权mri来计算病变的体积。对于体积标准,进行性疾病被定义为体积增加至少30%,部分缓解的特征是体积减少20%。我们的研究表明,所提出的体积标准在几个方面优于RANO-BM标准:1)评估每个病变,而RANO-BM未能评估9.2%的病变。2)对140个病变的反应进行了有效分类,而RANO-BM仅对72个病变进行了有效分类。3)确定脑转移复发的中位数比RANO-BM标准早3.3个月。我们的研究表明,与RANO-BM标准相比,体积标准在改善脑转移的反应评估方面具有优势。我们提出的标准允许评估每个病变,无论其大小或形状,更好的分类,并能够早期识别进行性疾病。容积标准为评估治疗反应提供了一种标准化、可靠和客观的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Volumetric Analysis: Rethinking Brain Metastases Response Assessment
The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology for Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria are the gold standard for assessing brain metastases (BMs) treatment response. However, they are limited by their reliance on one dimension, despite the routine use of high-resolution T1-weighted MRI scans for BMs, which allows for 3D measurements. Our study aimed to investigate whether volumetric measurements could improve the response assessment in patients with BMs. We retrospectively evaluated a dataset comprising 783 BMs and analyzed the response of 185 of them from 132 patients who underwent stereotactic radiotherapy between 2007 and 2021 at five hospitals. We used T1-weighted MRIs to compute the volume of the lesions. For the volumetric criteria, progressive disease was defined as at least a 30% increase in volume, and partial response was characterized by a 20% volume reduction. Our study showed that the proposed volumetric criteria outperformed the RANO-BM criteria in several aspects: 1) Evaluating every lesion, while RANO-BM failed to evaluate 9.2% of them. 2) Classifying response effectively in 140 lesions, compared to only 72 lesions classified by RANO-BM. 3) Identifying BM recurrences a median of 3.3 months earlier than RANO-BM criteria. Our study demonstrates the superiority of volumetric criteria in improving the response assessment of BMs compared to the RANO-BM criteria. Our proposed criteria allow for evaluation of every lesion, regardless of its size or shape, better classification, and enable earlier identification of progressive disease. Volumetric criteria provide a standardized, reliable, and objective tool for assessing treatment response.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intensive pediatric chemotherapy regimen (PNET HR+5) in adult high-risk medulloblastoma and pinealoblastoma patients Longitudinal assessment of quality of life, neurocognition and psychopathology in patients with low-grade glioma on first-line temozolomide: a feasibility study Leveraging murine models of the Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) cancer predisposition syndrome to elucidate the cellular circuits that drive pediatric low-grade glioma formation and progression FGFR1 gene mutation as a potential risk factor for spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage in pediatric low grade glioma patients Medulloblastomas with ELP1 pathogenic variants: a weakly penetrant syndrome with a restricted spectrum in a limited age window
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1