Kalah M. Villagrana PhD, MSW, MPA, Ann Turnlund Carver MSW, Lynn C. Holley PhD, ACSW, Ijeoma Nwabuzor Ogbonnaya PhD, MSW, Tonia Stott PhD, MSW, Ramona Denby PhD, MSW, Kristin M. Ferguson PhD, MSW
{"title":"你必须去寻找信息\":有寄养经历的待产和育儿青年利用服务的障碍","authors":"Kalah M. Villagrana PhD, MSW, MPA, Ann Turnlund Carver MSW, Lynn C. Holley PhD, ACSW, Ijeoma Nwabuzor Ogbonnaya PhD, MSW, Tonia Stott PhD, MSW, Ramona Denby PhD, MSW, Kristin M. Ferguson PhD, MSW","doi":"10.1111/cfs.13116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Unique service needs exist for expectant or parenting youth with foster care histories (EPY) and their families. Informed by Critical Ecological Systems Theory (CEST), this exploratory qualitative study presents findings from an inductive content analysis of in-depth interviews and focus groups with EPY and service providers. The study included nine in-depth face-to-face interviews with service providers (<i>n</i> = 5) and EPY (<i>n</i> = 4) as well as five focus groups with service providers (<i>n</i> = 23) and three with EPY (<i>n</i> = 7) to identify the characteristics of service providers, agencies and systems that may act as barriers to service utilization among EPY with a foster care history (<i>n =</i> 10) or juvenile justice history (<i>n</i> = 1). Service provider characteristics included negative attitudes towards EPY and/or those with child welfare experiences. Agency characteristics included a lack of workforce diversity, employee turnover, lack of training about diverse communities, restrictive enrolment processes and eligibility requirements, lack of childcare and transportation and limited accessibility of services. System characteristics included a lack of up-to-date information about existing services, territorialism, funding sources that do not prioritize interagency collaboration and a lack of communication/coordination among agencies. Implications include hiring and retaining a diverse workforce, providing training about diverse communities and implicit biases concerning young parents, developing navigation services specifically for EPY and developing processes for sharing data and communicating across systems that interact with EPY.</p>","PeriodicalId":10025,"journal":{"name":"Child & Family Social Work","volume":"29 2","pages":"571-583"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cfs.13116","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘You have to go hunting for information’: Barriers to service utilization among expectant and parenting youth with experience in foster care\",\"authors\":\"Kalah M. Villagrana PhD, MSW, MPA, Ann Turnlund Carver MSW, Lynn C. Holley PhD, ACSW, Ijeoma Nwabuzor Ogbonnaya PhD, MSW, Tonia Stott PhD, MSW, Ramona Denby PhD, MSW, Kristin M. Ferguson PhD, MSW\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cfs.13116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Unique service needs exist for expectant or parenting youth with foster care histories (EPY) and their families. Informed by Critical Ecological Systems Theory (CEST), this exploratory qualitative study presents findings from an inductive content analysis of in-depth interviews and focus groups with EPY and service providers. The study included nine in-depth face-to-face interviews with service providers (<i>n</i> = 5) and EPY (<i>n</i> = 4) as well as five focus groups with service providers (<i>n</i> = 23) and three with EPY (<i>n</i> = 7) to identify the characteristics of service providers, agencies and systems that may act as barriers to service utilization among EPY with a foster care history (<i>n =</i> 10) or juvenile justice history (<i>n</i> = 1). Service provider characteristics included negative attitudes towards EPY and/or those with child welfare experiences. Agency characteristics included a lack of workforce diversity, employee turnover, lack of training about diverse communities, restrictive enrolment processes and eligibility requirements, lack of childcare and transportation and limited accessibility of services. System characteristics included a lack of up-to-date information about existing services, territorialism, funding sources that do not prioritize interagency collaboration and a lack of communication/coordination among agencies. Implications include hiring and retaining a diverse workforce, providing training about diverse communities and implicit biases concerning young parents, developing navigation services specifically for EPY and developing processes for sharing data and communicating across systems that interact with EPY.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child & Family Social Work\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"571-583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cfs.13116\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child & Family Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.13116\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Family Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.13116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
‘You have to go hunting for information’: Barriers to service utilization among expectant and parenting youth with experience in foster care
Unique service needs exist for expectant or parenting youth with foster care histories (EPY) and their families. Informed by Critical Ecological Systems Theory (CEST), this exploratory qualitative study presents findings from an inductive content analysis of in-depth interviews and focus groups with EPY and service providers. The study included nine in-depth face-to-face interviews with service providers (n = 5) and EPY (n = 4) as well as five focus groups with service providers (n = 23) and three with EPY (n = 7) to identify the characteristics of service providers, agencies and systems that may act as barriers to service utilization among EPY with a foster care history (n = 10) or juvenile justice history (n = 1). Service provider characteristics included negative attitudes towards EPY and/or those with child welfare experiences. Agency characteristics included a lack of workforce diversity, employee turnover, lack of training about diverse communities, restrictive enrolment processes and eligibility requirements, lack of childcare and transportation and limited accessibility of services. System characteristics included a lack of up-to-date information about existing services, territorialism, funding sources that do not prioritize interagency collaboration and a lack of communication/coordination among agencies. Implications include hiring and retaining a diverse workforce, providing training about diverse communities and implicit biases concerning young parents, developing navigation services specifically for EPY and developing processes for sharing data and communicating across systems that interact with EPY.
期刊介绍:
Child and Family Social Work provides a forum where researchers, practitioners, policy-makers and managers in the field of child and family social work exchange knowledge, increase understanding and develop notions of good practice. In its promotion of research and practice, which is both disciplined and articulate, the Journal is dedicated to advancing the wellbeing and welfare of children and their families throughout the world. Child and Family Social Work publishes original and distinguished contributions on matters of research, theory, policy and practice in the field of social work with children and their families. The Journal gives international definition to the discipline and practice of child and family social work.