了解联系人的时间偏好有助于成功开展电话跟进工作

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuroepidemiology Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1159/000535639
Olivia Brancatisano, Megan Reyneke, Jan Cameron, M. Kilkenny, Dawn Harris, Natasha A. Lannin, D. Cadilhac
{"title":"了解联系人的时间偏好有助于成功开展电话跟进工作","authors":"Olivia Brancatisano, Megan Reyneke, Jan Cameron, M. Kilkenny, Dawn Harris, Natasha A. Lannin, D. Cadilhac","doi":"10.1159/000535639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: There is limited evidence as to whether knowing a participant’s contact preferences improves completion of telephone assessments in clinical trials. We examined i) participants’ preferences for telephone contact and these preferences related to day and time of actual contact; ii) the number of contact attempts to successfully complete telephone assessments; iii) the association between participant characteristics and successful telephone contacts. \nMaterials and Methods: A prospective observational study nested within the Recovery-focused Community support to Avoid readmissions and improve participant after Stroke (ReCAPS) trial was undertaken. Information was collected on preferences (set days of the week, any weekday, morning, afternoon, evening, anytime) for assessment calls at 3 months post randomization. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used. \nResults: Of the 232 participants (average age 66 years, 69% male), 59% preferred calls on any weekday. Wednesday (26%) and Monday (21%) and mornings (49%) were preferred. Approximately 70% of telephone calls were completed within three contact attempts. Approximately 60% of all calls were completed on participants’ preferred day and time. There was no association between participant characteristics (sex, age, employment status, and living alone) and the number of contact attempts made for the telephone call assessment. There were no participant characteristics associated with the successful completion of assessments on participants’ preferred time/day.\nConclusions: We provide new evidence, based on a case study in stroke, highlighting the importance of knowing a participant’s preferred contact day and time for the timely completion of assessments via telephone call.","PeriodicalId":54730,"journal":{"name":"Neuroepidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge of day and time contact preferences assists in successful telephone follow-up\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Brancatisano, Megan Reyneke, Jan Cameron, M. Kilkenny, Dawn Harris, Natasha A. Lannin, D. Cadilhac\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000535639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: There is limited evidence as to whether knowing a participant’s contact preferences improves completion of telephone assessments in clinical trials. We examined i) participants’ preferences for telephone contact and these preferences related to day and time of actual contact; ii) the number of contact attempts to successfully complete telephone assessments; iii) the association between participant characteristics and successful telephone contacts. \\nMaterials and Methods: A prospective observational study nested within the Recovery-focused Community support to Avoid readmissions and improve participant after Stroke (ReCAPS) trial was undertaken. Information was collected on preferences (set days of the week, any weekday, morning, afternoon, evening, anytime) for assessment calls at 3 months post randomization. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used. \\nResults: Of the 232 participants (average age 66 years, 69% male), 59% preferred calls on any weekday. Wednesday (26%) and Monday (21%) and mornings (49%) were preferred. Approximately 70% of telephone calls were completed within three contact attempts. Approximately 60% of all calls were completed on participants’ preferred day and time. There was no association between participant characteristics (sex, age, employment status, and living alone) and the number of contact attempts made for the telephone call assessment. There were no participant characteristics associated with the successful completion of assessments on participants’ preferred time/day.\\nConclusions: We provide new evidence, based on a case study in stroke, highlighting the importance of knowing a participant’s preferred contact day and time for the timely completion of assessments via telephone call.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroepidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroepidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535639\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroepidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解参与者的联系偏好是否能提高临床试验中电话评估的完成度,这方面的证据有限。我们检查了i)参与者对电话联系的偏好以及这些偏好与实际联系的日期和时间有关;Ii)成功完成电话评估的联系次数;Iii)参与者特征与成功电话联系之间的关联。材料和方法:一项前瞻性观察研究嵌套在康复为重点的社区支持,以避免卒中后再入院和改善参与者(ReCAPS)试验中进行。在随机分组后3个月,收集偏好信息(一周的固定日期、工作日的任何一天、上午、下午、晚上、任何时间),用于评估电话。采用描述性统计和逻辑回归。结果:在232名参与者中(平均年龄66岁,69%为男性),59%的人喜欢在工作日打电话。周三(26%)、周一(21%)和上午(49%)更受欢迎。大约70%的电话在三次联系内完成。大约60%的电话是在参与者喜欢的日期和时间完成的。参与者特征(性别、年龄、就业状况和独居)与电话评估中尝试联系的次数之间没有关联。没有参与者的特征与成功完成参与者的首选时间/天的评估相关。结论:我们提供了新的证据,基于一个中风的案例研究,强调了了解参与者的首选接触日期和时间对于通过电话及时完成评估的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge of day and time contact preferences assists in successful telephone follow-up
Objectives: There is limited evidence as to whether knowing a participant’s contact preferences improves completion of telephone assessments in clinical trials. We examined i) participants’ preferences for telephone contact and these preferences related to day and time of actual contact; ii) the number of contact attempts to successfully complete telephone assessments; iii) the association between participant characteristics and successful telephone contacts. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study nested within the Recovery-focused Community support to Avoid readmissions and improve participant after Stroke (ReCAPS) trial was undertaken. Information was collected on preferences (set days of the week, any weekday, morning, afternoon, evening, anytime) for assessment calls at 3 months post randomization. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used. Results: Of the 232 participants (average age 66 years, 69% male), 59% preferred calls on any weekday. Wednesday (26%) and Monday (21%) and mornings (49%) were preferred. Approximately 70% of telephone calls were completed within three contact attempts. Approximately 60% of all calls were completed on participants’ preferred day and time. There was no association between participant characteristics (sex, age, employment status, and living alone) and the number of contact attempts made for the telephone call assessment. There were no participant characteristics associated with the successful completion of assessments on participants’ preferred time/day. Conclusions: We provide new evidence, based on a case study in stroke, highlighting the importance of knowing a participant’s preferred contact day and time for the timely completion of assessments via telephone call.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroepidemiology
Neuroepidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Neuroepidemiology'' is the only internationally recognised peer-reviewed periodical devoted to descriptive, analytical and experimental studies in the epidemiology of neurologic disease. The scope of the journal expands the boundaries of traditional clinical neurology by providing new insights regarding the etiology, determinants, distribution, management and prevention of diseases of the nervous system.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence, incidence, and mortality of Myasthenia Gravis and myasthenic syndromes: a systematic review. Strength of Association between Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Neurological Disorders in Children: A Case-Control Study. Low sun exposure is associated with both progressive-onset and relapse-onset multiple sclerosis risk: a case-control study. Changing Epidemiology of Neurological Diseases in Africa. Insights from ARCOS-V's Transition to Remote Data Collection During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1