社区药剂师对质子泵抑制剂的认识、态度和做法

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.33483/jfpau.1322001
Aslınur Albayrak, İrem Yildiz
{"title":"社区药剂师对质子泵抑制剂的认识、态度和做法","authors":"Aslınur Albayrak, İrem Yildiz","doi":"10.33483/jfpau.1322001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of community pharmacists about proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).\nMaterial and Method: The study was a cross-sectional online survey study It was conducted with community pharmacists in Türkiye between 1 November 2022 and 15 April 2023. The survey questions were created by revising the previous study and consisted of 32 questions. Of these, 4 were about demographic information, 16 were about knowledge, 6 were about attitude, and 6 were about practices.\nResult and Discussion: The vast majority of pharmacists who participated into the study (97.6%) knew that drugs such as pantoprazole, omeprazole, etc. were PPIs, and a majority of pharmacists (84.5%) knew that PPIs were inactive pro-drugs. 63.1% of the pharmacists answered correctly that omeprazole had the most individual variability. The vast majority (93.5%) of pharmacists believed that PPIs were overused in Türkiye. 86.3% of pharmacists believed that excessive consumption of PPIs resulted in increased costs and adverse drug reactions. 46 pharmacists (27.38%) declared that they have used PPIs in the last 1 year. Pantoprazole (15.5%) and lansoprazole (7.7%) were the most commonly used PPIs, respectively. According to our study, although pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices about PPIs were generally good, there were also some deficiencies in their knowledge. Therefore, pharmacists need to update themselves and be supported by interdisciplinary continuous educations.","PeriodicalId":7891,"journal":{"name":"Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":"56 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND PRACTICES OF COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ABOUT PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS\",\"authors\":\"Aslınur Albayrak, İrem Yildiz\",\"doi\":\"10.33483/jfpau.1322001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of community pharmacists about proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).\\nMaterial and Method: The study was a cross-sectional online survey study It was conducted with community pharmacists in Türkiye between 1 November 2022 and 15 April 2023. The survey questions were created by revising the previous study and consisted of 32 questions. Of these, 4 were about demographic information, 16 were about knowledge, 6 were about attitude, and 6 were about practices.\\nResult and Discussion: The vast majority of pharmacists who participated into the study (97.6%) knew that drugs such as pantoprazole, omeprazole, etc. were PPIs, and a majority of pharmacists (84.5%) knew that PPIs were inactive pro-drugs. 63.1% of the pharmacists answered correctly that omeprazole had the most individual variability. The vast majority (93.5%) of pharmacists believed that PPIs were overused in Türkiye. 86.3% of pharmacists believed that excessive consumption of PPIs resulted in increased costs and adverse drug reactions. 46 pharmacists (27.38%) declared that they have used PPIs in the last 1 year. Pantoprazole (15.5%) and lansoprazole (7.7%) were the most commonly used PPIs, respectively. According to our study, although pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices about PPIs were generally good, there were also some deficiencies in their knowledge. Therefore, pharmacists need to update themselves and be supported by interdisciplinary continuous educations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"56 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33483/jfpau.1322001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33483/jfpau.1322001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解社区药师对质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)的认识、态度和实践情况。材料和方法:该研究是一项横断面在线调查研究,于2022年11月1日至2023年4月15日期间在基耶省的社区药剂师中进行。调查问题是通过修改之前的研究而产生的,由32个问题组成。其中,人口统计信息4项,知识16项,态度6项,实践6项。结果与讨论:参与研究的绝大多数药师(97.6%)知道泮托拉唑、奥美拉唑等为PPIs,绝大多数药师(84.5%)知道PPIs为非活性前药。63.1%的药师正确回答奥美拉唑的个体差异性最大。绝大多数(93.5%)的药师认为PPIs在临床中存在滥用现象。86.3%的药师认为PPIs的过量使用导致费用增加和药物不良反应。46名(27.38%)药师表示在过去1年内使用过ppi。泮托拉唑(15.5%)和兰索拉唑(7.7%)分别是最常用的ppi。根据我们的研究,虽然药师对PPIs的知识、态度和实践总体良好,但也存在一些不足。因此,药剂师需要更新自己,并得到跨学科继续教育的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES AND PRACTICES OF COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ABOUT PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of community pharmacists about proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Material and Method: The study was a cross-sectional online survey study It was conducted with community pharmacists in Türkiye between 1 November 2022 and 15 April 2023. The survey questions were created by revising the previous study and consisted of 32 questions. Of these, 4 were about demographic information, 16 were about knowledge, 6 were about attitude, and 6 were about practices. Result and Discussion: The vast majority of pharmacists who participated into the study (97.6%) knew that drugs such as pantoprazole, omeprazole, etc. were PPIs, and a majority of pharmacists (84.5%) knew that PPIs were inactive pro-drugs. 63.1% of the pharmacists answered correctly that omeprazole had the most individual variability. The vast majority (93.5%) of pharmacists believed that PPIs were overused in Türkiye. 86.3% of pharmacists believed that excessive consumption of PPIs resulted in increased costs and adverse drug reactions. 46 pharmacists (27.38%) declared that they have used PPIs in the last 1 year. Pantoprazole (15.5%) and lansoprazole (7.7%) were the most commonly used PPIs, respectively. According to our study, although pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices about PPIs were generally good, there were also some deficiencies in their knowledge. Therefore, pharmacists need to update themselves and be supported by interdisciplinary continuous educations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi
Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊最新文献
DETERMINATION OF THE CIRCADIAN OSCILLATION PATTERN OF UNFOLDED PROTEIN RESPONSE SIGNALING COMPONENTS IN HUMAN EMBRYONIC KIDNEY HEK293 CELLS SILDENAFIL DECREASED TNF-α AND IL-6 LEVELS IN CD‐INDUCED ACUTE TOXICITY CHOLINESTERASE AND TYROSINASE INHIBITORY ACTIVITY OF SUBCRITICAL WATER AND MICROWAVE EXTRACTS OF RAPHANUS SATIVUS L. ‘RED MEAT’ RADIX NETWORK TOXICOLOGY FOR THE CARDIOVASCULAR TOXICITY ANALYSIS OF TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORS STRUCTURAL INSIGHTS AND ANTICANCER POTENTIAL OF MELITTIN IN CD147 INTERACTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1