干密实砂中 EPB 盾构隧道的面层破坏:模型试验和 DEM 研究

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Canadian Geotechnical Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1139/cgj-2023-0072
Jun Wang, Guojin Lin, Ning Tian, Kun Feng, Guowne Xu, Xiong-yu Hu, Zi-quan Chen, Chuan He
{"title":"干密实砂中 EPB 盾构隧道的面层破坏:模型试验和 DEM 研究","authors":"Jun Wang, Guojin Lin, Ning Tian, Kun Feng, Guowne Xu, Xiong-yu Hu, Zi-quan Chen, Chuan He","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2023-0072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims at addressing the face failure of earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunnels in dry dense sand by model tests and discrete element method (DEM) models. The model tests incorporated a miniature EPB shield which could fully reproduce the real tunnel construction of excavation and support. DEM models simulating the model tests were developed to capture the underlying face failure mechanism. Results show that both the limit support pressure obtained at chamber board and tunnel face increase with increasing C/D (C is tunnel buried depth, D is tunnel diameter). The ratio of the former to the latter approximates 0.60 due to the soil retaining of cutterhead panel, and it is independent of C/D. The local face failure initializes around tunnel face and develops directly to the global failure outcropping the ground surface in one phase with C/D≤1.0, while the local failure develops to the global failure in three phases with C/D=2.0 due to the soil arching evolution. The soil arching gets weaker when it propagates upward, and the horizontal stress concentration in the longitudinal direction is stronger than the transverse direction due to the difference of arch foot.","PeriodicalId":9382,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Face failure of EPB shield tunnels in dry dense sand: a model test and DEM study\",\"authors\":\"Jun Wang, Guojin Lin, Ning Tian, Kun Feng, Guowne Xu, Xiong-yu Hu, Zi-quan Chen, Chuan He\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cgj-2023-0072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims at addressing the face failure of earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunnels in dry dense sand by model tests and discrete element method (DEM) models. The model tests incorporated a miniature EPB shield which could fully reproduce the real tunnel construction of excavation and support. DEM models simulating the model tests were developed to capture the underlying face failure mechanism. Results show that both the limit support pressure obtained at chamber board and tunnel face increase with increasing C/D (C is tunnel buried depth, D is tunnel diameter). The ratio of the former to the latter approximates 0.60 due to the soil retaining of cutterhead panel, and it is independent of C/D. The local face failure initializes around tunnel face and develops directly to the global failure outcropping the ground surface in one phase with C/D≤1.0, while the local failure develops to the global failure in three phases with C/D=2.0 due to the soil arching evolution. The soil arching gets weaker when it propagates upward, and the horizontal stress concentration in the longitudinal direction is stronger than the transverse direction due to the difference of arch foot.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Geotechnical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Geotechnical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2023-0072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2023-0072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用模型试验和离散元法(DEM)对干密砂中土压平衡盾构隧道工作面破坏进行了研究。模型试验采用了微型盾构机,可以完全再现隧道开挖和支护的真实施工过程。建立了模拟模型试验的DEM模型,以捕捉下伏工作面破坏机制。结果表明:随着C/D (C为隧道埋深,D为隧道直径)的增大,硐室板和巷道端面的极限支护压力均增大;由于刀盘盘的挡土作用,前者与后者的比值约为0.60,与C/D无关。局部工作面破坏在巷道工作面周围初始化,并在一个阶段(C/D≤1.0)内直接发展为地表整体破坏,而由于土拱演化,局部破坏发展为三个阶段(C/D=2.0)的整体破坏。土拱向上传播的过程中,土拱的强度逐渐减弱,且由于拱脚的不同,纵向的水平应力集中强于横向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Face failure of EPB shield tunnels in dry dense sand: a model test and DEM study
This paper aims at addressing the face failure of earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunnels in dry dense sand by model tests and discrete element method (DEM) models. The model tests incorporated a miniature EPB shield which could fully reproduce the real tunnel construction of excavation and support. DEM models simulating the model tests were developed to capture the underlying face failure mechanism. Results show that both the limit support pressure obtained at chamber board and tunnel face increase with increasing C/D (C is tunnel buried depth, D is tunnel diameter). The ratio of the former to the latter approximates 0.60 due to the soil retaining of cutterhead panel, and it is independent of C/D. The local face failure initializes around tunnel face and develops directly to the global failure outcropping the ground surface in one phase with C/D≤1.0, while the local failure develops to the global failure in three phases with C/D=2.0 due to the soil arching evolution. The soil arching gets weaker when it propagates upward, and the horizontal stress concentration in the longitudinal direction is stronger than the transverse direction due to the difference of arch foot.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Canadian Geotechnical Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geotechnical Journal features articles, notes, reviews, and discussions related to new developments in geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, and applied sciences. The topics of papers written by researchers and engineers/scientists active in industry include soil and rock mechanics, material properties and fundamental behaviour, site characterization, foundations, excavations, tunnels, dams and embankments, slopes, landslides, geological and rock engineering, ground improvement, hydrogeology and contaminant hydrogeology, geochemistry, waste management, geosynthetics, offshore engineering, ice, frozen ground and northern engineering, risk and reliability applications, and physical and numerical modelling. Contributions that have practical relevance are preferred, including case records. Purely theoretical contributions are not generally published unless they are on a topic of special interest (like unsaturated soil mechanics or cold regions geotechnics) or they have direct practical value.
期刊最新文献
Estimating relative density from shallow depth CPTs in normally consolidated and overconsolidated siliceous sand Kinematic response of floating single piles in saturated and nearly-saturated soil to P-waves Experimental investigation on mechanical behavior of natural soft clay by true triaxial tests Experimental study on the mechanical characteristics of NPR anchored rock under kilometer-deep buried high geostress conditions Evolution of structure and anisotropic shear stiffness of compacted loess during compression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1