使用替代模型和共形推理的统计验证以及与风险意识验证的比较

IF 2 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1145/3635160
Xin Qin, Yuan Xia, Aditya Zutshi, Chuchu Fan, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh
{"title":"使用替代模型和共形推理的统计验证以及与风险意识验证的比较","authors":"Xin Qin, Yuan Xia, Aditya Zutshi, Chuchu Fan, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh","doi":"10.1145/3635160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uncertainty in safety-critical cyber-physical systems can be modeled using a finite number of parameters or parameterized input signals. Given a system specification in Signal Temporal Logic (STL), we would like to verify that for all (infinite) values of the model parameters/input signals, the system satisfies its specification. Unfortunately, this problem is undecidable in general. Statistical model checking (SMC) offers a solution by providing guarantees on the correctness of CPS models by statistically reasoning on model simulations. We propose a new approach for statistical verification of CPS models for user-provided distribution on the model parameters. Our technique uses model simulations to learn surrogate models, and uses conformal inference to provide probabilistic guarantees on the satisfaction of a given STL property. Additionally, we can provide prediction intervals containing the quantitative satisfaction values of the given STL property for any user-specified confidence level. We compare this prediction interval with the interval we get using risk estimation procedures. We also propose a refinement procedure based on Gaussian Process (GP)-based surrogate models for obtaining fine-grained probabilistic guarantees over sub-regions in the parameter space. This in turn enables the CPS designer to choose assured validity domains in the parameter space for safety-critical applications. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our technique on several CPS models.","PeriodicalId":7055,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems","volume":"58 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical Verification using Surrogate Models and Conformal Inference and a Comparison with Risk-aware Verification\",\"authors\":\"Xin Qin, Yuan Xia, Aditya Zutshi, Chuchu Fan, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3635160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Uncertainty in safety-critical cyber-physical systems can be modeled using a finite number of parameters or parameterized input signals. Given a system specification in Signal Temporal Logic (STL), we would like to verify that for all (infinite) values of the model parameters/input signals, the system satisfies its specification. Unfortunately, this problem is undecidable in general. Statistical model checking (SMC) offers a solution by providing guarantees on the correctness of CPS models by statistically reasoning on model simulations. We propose a new approach for statistical verification of CPS models for user-provided distribution on the model parameters. Our technique uses model simulations to learn surrogate models, and uses conformal inference to provide probabilistic guarantees on the satisfaction of a given STL property. Additionally, we can provide prediction intervals containing the quantitative satisfaction values of the given STL property for any user-specified confidence level. We compare this prediction interval with the interval we get using risk estimation procedures. We also propose a refinement procedure based on Gaussian Process (GP)-based surrogate models for obtaining fine-grained probabilistic guarantees over sub-regions in the parameter space. This in turn enables the CPS designer to choose assured validity domains in the parameter space for safety-critical applications. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our technique on several CPS models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems\",\"volume\":\"58 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3635160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3635160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

安全关键型网络物理系统中的不确定性可以使用有限数量的参数或参数化输入信号进行建模。给定信号时序逻辑(STL)中的系统规范,我们希望验证对于模型参数/输入信号的所有(无限)值,系统满足其规范。不幸的是,这个问题通常是无法确定的。统计模型检验(SMC)通过对模型模拟进行统计推理来保证CPS模型的正确性,从而提供了一种解决方案。我们提出了一种新的方法来统计验证用户提供的模型参数分布的CPS模型。我们的技术使用模型模拟来学习代理模型,并使用共形推理来提供满足给定STL属性的概率保证。此外,对于任何用户指定的置信水平,我们可以提供包含给定STL属性的定量满意值的预测区间。我们将这个预测区间与使用风险估计程序得到的区间进行比较。我们还提出了一种基于高斯过程(GP)的代理模型的改进过程,用于在参数空间的子区域上获得细粒度的概率保证。这反过来又使CPS设计人员能够在参数空间中为安全关键型应用程序选择可靠的有效性域。最后,我们在几个CPS模型上展示了我们的技术的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Statistical Verification using Surrogate Models and Conformal Inference and a Comparison with Risk-aware Verification
Uncertainty in safety-critical cyber-physical systems can be modeled using a finite number of parameters or parameterized input signals. Given a system specification in Signal Temporal Logic (STL), we would like to verify that for all (infinite) values of the model parameters/input signals, the system satisfies its specification. Unfortunately, this problem is undecidable in general. Statistical model checking (SMC) offers a solution by providing guarantees on the correctness of CPS models by statistically reasoning on model simulations. We propose a new approach for statistical verification of CPS models for user-provided distribution on the model parameters. Our technique uses model simulations to learn surrogate models, and uses conformal inference to provide probabilistic guarantees on the satisfaction of a given STL property. Additionally, we can provide prediction intervals containing the quantitative satisfaction values of the given STL property for any user-specified confidence level. We compare this prediction interval with the interval we get using risk estimation procedures. We also propose a refinement procedure based on Gaussian Process (GP)-based surrogate models for obtaining fine-grained probabilistic guarantees over sub-regions in the parameter space. This in turn enables the CPS designer to choose assured validity domains in the parameter space for safety-critical applications. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our technique on several CPS models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems
ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
On Cyber-Physical Fault Resilience in Data Communication: A Case From A LoRaWAN Network Systems Design DistressNet-NG: A Resilient Data Storage and Sharing Framework for Mobile Edge Computing in Cyber-Physical Systems A Blockchain Architecture to Increase the Resilience of Industrial Control Systems from the Effects of a Ransomware Attack: A Proposal and Initial Results A Combinatorial Optimization Analysis Method for Detecting Malicious Industrial Internet Attack Behaviors Statistical Verification using Surrogate Models and Conformal Inference and a Comparison with Risk-aware Verification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1