多因素模型的投资组合优化和估值能力:来自达卡证券交易所的观察证据

IF 1.3 Q3 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.3389/fams.2023.1271485
Md. Ahsan Kabir, Liping Yu, Sanjoy Kumar Sarker, Md. Nahiduzzaman, Tanmay Borman
{"title":"多因素模型的投资组合优化和估值能力:来自达卡证券交易所的观察证据","authors":"Md. Ahsan Kabir, Liping Yu, Sanjoy Kumar Sarker, Md. Nahiduzzaman, Tanmay Borman","doi":"10.3389/fams.2023.1271485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main goal of this study is to examine the return explanation strengths of the Carhart four-factor, the Fama–French three-factor, and the single-factor models in the context of the Bangladeshi stock market. We, therefore, reveal the risk-adjusted returns, test the valuation capability of multi-factor models, and estimate optimal portfolio weights of stocks listed in DSE under the DSE30 index. Our findings demonstrate that large capitalization firms that have low or medium book-to-market (B/M) ratios produce more concentrated returns than their counterparts, resulting in greater earnings per unit of total, systematic, and downside risks. Furthermore, we discover that each factorial value has an impressive capacity to explain the market excess returns; however, the influence of factor values on the cross-section of stock returns is somewhat contradictory. In particular, the momentum factor is unable to describe the cross-section excess returns, whereas the risk premium, size, and value factors have a significant impact on the cross-section excess returns. Finally, we find that a large-cap firm with a low B/M ratio is suitable for risk-seeking investors; in contrast, a small-cap firm with a low B/M ratio is appropriate for lower risk tolerance investors. Moreover, our empirical outcomes have noteworthy implications for private companies, investors, and policymakers.","PeriodicalId":36662,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics","volume":"124 51","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Portfolio optimization and valuation capability of multi-factor models: an observational evidence from Dhaka stock exchange\",\"authors\":\"Md. Ahsan Kabir, Liping Yu, Sanjoy Kumar Sarker, Md. Nahiduzzaman, Tanmay Borman\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fams.2023.1271485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main goal of this study is to examine the return explanation strengths of the Carhart four-factor, the Fama–French three-factor, and the single-factor models in the context of the Bangladeshi stock market. We, therefore, reveal the risk-adjusted returns, test the valuation capability of multi-factor models, and estimate optimal portfolio weights of stocks listed in DSE under the DSE30 index. Our findings demonstrate that large capitalization firms that have low or medium book-to-market (B/M) ratios produce more concentrated returns than their counterparts, resulting in greater earnings per unit of total, systematic, and downside risks. Furthermore, we discover that each factorial value has an impressive capacity to explain the market excess returns; however, the influence of factor values on the cross-section of stock returns is somewhat contradictory. In particular, the momentum factor is unable to describe the cross-section excess returns, whereas the risk premium, size, and value factors have a significant impact on the cross-section excess returns. Finally, we find that a large-cap firm with a low B/M ratio is suitable for risk-seeking investors; in contrast, a small-cap firm with a low B/M ratio is appropriate for lower risk tolerance investors. Moreover, our empirical outcomes have noteworthy implications for private companies, investors, and policymakers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics\",\"volume\":\"124 51\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2023.1271485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2023.1271485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是检验Carhart四因素模型、Fama-French三因素模型和单因素模型在孟加拉国股票市场背景下的收益解释优势。因此,我们揭示了风险调整后的收益,检验了多因素模型的估值能力,并估计了DSE30指数下DSE上市股票的最优投资组合权重。我们的研究结果表明,具有低或中等账面市值比(B/M)的大型资本公司比其同行产生更集中的回报,从而导致总、系统和下行风险的单位收益更高。此外,我们发现每个阶乘值都具有令人印象深刻的解释市场超额收益的能力;然而,因子值对股票收益横截面的影响是有些矛盾的。其中动量因子无法描述横截面超额收益,而风险溢价、规模和价值因子对横截面超额收益有显著影响。最后,我们发现低账面价值比的大盘股公司更适合风险寻求型投资者;相比之下,低账面价值比的小盘股公司适合风险承受能力较低的投资者。此外,我们的实证结果对私营企业、投资者和政策制定者具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Portfolio optimization and valuation capability of multi-factor models: an observational evidence from Dhaka stock exchange
The main goal of this study is to examine the return explanation strengths of the Carhart four-factor, the Fama–French three-factor, and the single-factor models in the context of the Bangladeshi stock market. We, therefore, reveal the risk-adjusted returns, test the valuation capability of multi-factor models, and estimate optimal portfolio weights of stocks listed in DSE under the DSE30 index. Our findings demonstrate that large capitalization firms that have low or medium book-to-market (B/M) ratios produce more concentrated returns than their counterparts, resulting in greater earnings per unit of total, systematic, and downside risks. Furthermore, we discover that each factorial value has an impressive capacity to explain the market excess returns; however, the influence of factor values on the cross-section of stock returns is somewhat contradictory. In particular, the momentum factor is unable to describe the cross-section excess returns, whereas the risk premium, size, and value factors have a significant impact on the cross-section excess returns. Finally, we find that a large-cap firm with a low B/M ratio is suitable for risk-seeking investors; in contrast, a small-cap firm with a low B/M ratio is appropriate for lower risk tolerance investors. Moreover, our empirical outcomes have noteworthy implications for private companies, investors, and policymakers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
117
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Third-degree B-spline collocation method for singularly perturbed time delay parabolic problem with two parameters Item response theory to discriminate COVID-19 knowledge and attitudes among university students Editorial: Justified modeling frameworks and novel interpretations of ecological and epidemiological systems Pneumonia and COVID-19 co-infection modeling with optimal control analysis Enhanced corn seed disease classification: leveraging MobileNetV2 with feature augmentation and transfer learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1