接种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗后的产妇和新生儿结局:队列研究的系统回顾和元分析

Anand Vijayakumar Palur Ramakrishnan, R. Basutkar, Sugash Murugan, Shonitha Sagadevan, Oorvashree Sri Hari, Shanmuga Priyan
{"title":"接种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗后的产妇和新生儿结局:队列研究的系统回顾和元分析","authors":"Anand Vijayakumar Palur Ramakrishnan, R. Basutkar, Sugash Murugan, Shonitha Sagadevan, Oorvashree Sri Hari, Shanmuga Priyan","doi":"10.2174/0126667975269133231117062158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nSARS-CoV-2 infection among pregnant women causes maternal and neonatal complications. Professional societies endorse the vaccination among pregnant women. This review of the\ncohort studies aims to assess the short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes among vaccinated vs.\nnon-vaccinated pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We searched Cochrane Central\nRegistry of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases. The observational\ncohort studies published from July 2021 to December 2022 were included. The eligibility criteria\nwere assessed. The studies documenting maternal and neonatal outcomes and the relative risk, and\n95% confidence interval were considered. Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction form was used,\nand the quality assessment of the included study was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. The quality of the grading was summarised with GradePro software. Data\nfrom the five cohort studies are considered. 56% of the un-vaccinated pregnant women experience\ncomposite adverse maternal outcomes (RR: 3.97; 95% CI:0.73,21.49; p-value: ˂0.11). There was a\nreduced risk of occurrence of the meconium-stained amniotic fluid who are vaccinated (RR: 0.89;\n95% CI:0.71, 1.12; p value=0.33). The unvaccinated group is 3.16 times more likely to take infertility treatment (RR: 3.54; 95% CI:2.04, 6.12; p-value: ˂0.00001). There was no significant difference concerning neonatal outcomes between both groups. The pregnant women who were not vaccinated against SARS-CoV had an increased risk for a composite adverse maternal outcome and\nmeconium-stained amniotic fluid. The vaccine has effectively prevented the disease in the first six\nmonths. Additional studies are needed to understand the safety of the SARS-CoV vaccine.\n","PeriodicalId":10815,"journal":{"name":"Coronaviruses","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes after Vaccination with SARS-CoV-2: A\\nSystematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies\",\"authors\":\"Anand Vijayakumar Palur Ramakrishnan, R. Basutkar, Sugash Murugan, Shonitha Sagadevan, Oorvashree Sri Hari, Shanmuga Priyan\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0126667975269133231117062158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nSARS-CoV-2 infection among pregnant women causes maternal and neonatal complications. Professional societies endorse the vaccination among pregnant women. This review of the\\ncohort studies aims to assess the short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes among vaccinated vs.\\nnon-vaccinated pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We searched Cochrane Central\\nRegistry of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases. The observational\\ncohort studies published from July 2021 to December 2022 were included. The eligibility criteria\\nwere assessed. The studies documenting maternal and neonatal outcomes and the relative risk, and\\n95% confidence interval were considered. Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction form was used,\\nand the quality assessment of the included study was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. The quality of the grading was summarised with GradePro software. Data\\nfrom the five cohort studies are considered. 56% of the un-vaccinated pregnant women experience\\ncomposite adverse maternal outcomes (RR: 3.97; 95% CI:0.73,21.49; p-value: ˂0.11). There was a\\nreduced risk of occurrence of the meconium-stained amniotic fluid who are vaccinated (RR: 0.89;\\n95% CI:0.71, 1.12; p value=0.33). The unvaccinated group is 3.16 times more likely to take infertility treatment (RR: 3.54; 95% CI:2.04, 6.12; p-value: ˂0.00001). There was no significant difference concerning neonatal outcomes between both groups. The pregnant women who were not vaccinated against SARS-CoV had an increased risk for a composite adverse maternal outcome and\\nmeconium-stained amniotic fluid. The vaccine has effectively prevented the disease in the first six\\nmonths. Additional studies are needed to understand the safety of the SARS-CoV vaccine.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":10815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronaviruses\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronaviruses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667975269133231117062158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronaviruses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667975269133231117062158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

孕妇感染SARS-CoV-2可导致孕产妇和新生儿并发症。专业协会支持孕妇接种疫苗。本综述旨在评估接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗的孕妇与未接种疫苗的孕妇之间的短期孕产妇和新生儿结局。我们检索了Cochrane CentralRegistry of Controlled Trials、Scopus、Google Scholar和PubMed数据库。纳入了从2021年7月至2022年12月发表的观察性研究。对入选标准进行了评估。研究记录了产妇和新生儿的结局和相对风险,并考虑了95%的置信区间。采用Joanna Briggs研究所数据提取表,采用Newcastle-Ottawa质量评估量表对纳入研究进行质量评估。用GradePro软件对评分质量进行总结。我们考虑了五个队列研究的数据。未接种疫苗的孕妇中有56%出现了综合不良孕产妇结局(RR: 3.97;95%置信区间:0.73,21.49;假定值:˂0.11)。接种疫苗的羊水出现粪染的风险降低(RR: 0.89;95% CI:0.71, 1.12;p值= 0.33)。未接种疫苗组接受不孕症治疗的可能性是未接种疫苗组的3.16倍(RR: 3.54;95% ci:2.04, 6.12;假定值:˂0.00001)。两组新生儿结局无显著差异。未接种sars冠状病毒疫苗的孕妇出现复合不良产妇结局和羊水粪染色的风险增加。疫苗在头六个月有效地预防了这种疾病。需要进一步的研究来了解sars冠状病毒疫苗的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes after Vaccination with SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies
SARS-CoV-2 infection among pregnant women causes maternal and neonatal complications. Professional societies endorse the vaccination among pregnant women. This review of the cohort studies aims to assess the short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes among vaccinated vs. non-vaccinated pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We searched Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases. The observational cohort studies published from July 2021 to December 2022 were included. The eligibility criteria were assessed. The studies documenting maternal and neonatal outcomes and the relative risk, and 95% confidence interval were considered. Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction form was used, and the quality assessment of the included study was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. The quality of the grading was summarised with GradePro software. Data from the five cohort studies are considered. 56% of the un-vaccinated pregnant women experience composite adverse maternal outcomes (RR: 3.97; 95% CI:0.73,21.49; p-value: ˂0.11). There was a reduced risk of occurrence of the meconium-stained amniotic fluid who are vaccinated (RR: 0.89; 95% CI:0.71, 1.12; p value=0.33). The unvaccinated group is 3.16 times more likely to take infertility treatment (RR: 3.54; 95% CI:2.04, 6.12; p-value: ˂0.00001). There was no significant difference concerning neonatal outcomes between both groups. The pregnant women who were not vaccinated against SARS-CoV had an increased risk for a composite adverse maternal outcome and meconium-stained amniotic fluid. The vaccine has effectively prevented the disease in the first six months. Additional studies are needed to understand the safety of the SARS-CoV vaccine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness on the Severity of Disease: A Case-control Study in Southeastern Iran Evaluation of Influenza Vaccination Coverage Among Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Analysis of Motivating and Hindering Factors Novel Coronavirus: An Overview of the History, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of the Pandemic COVID-19 Catastrophe, with Special Emphasis on Herbal Treatment Alternatives Spectrum of Long COVID Symptoms and Management Approaches in Europe and Latin America Identification of Epitope Against Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2: In Silico Vaccine Design Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1