Anand Vijayakumar Palur Ramakrishnan, R. Basutkar, Sugash Murugan, Shonitha Sagadevan, Oorvashree Sri Hari, Shanmuga Priyan
{"title":"接种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗后的产妇和新生儿结局:队列研究的系统回顾和元分析","authors":"Anand Vijayakumar Palur Ramakrishnan, R. Basutkar, Sugash Murugan, Shonitha Sagadevan, Oorvashree Sri Hari, Shanmuga Priyan","doi":"10.2174/0126667975269133231117062158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nSARS-CoV-2 infection among pregnant women causes maternal and neonatal complications. Professional societies endorse the vaccination among pregnant women. This review of the\ncohort studies aims to assess the short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes among vaccinated vs.\nnon-vaccinated pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We searched Cochrane Central\nRegistry of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases. The observational\ncohort studies published from July 2021 to December 2022 were included. The eligibility criteria\nwere assessed. The studies documenting maternal and neonatal outcomes and the relative risk, and\n95% confidence interval were considered. Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction form was used,\nand the quality assessment of the included study was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. The quality of the grading was summarised with GradePro software. Data\nfrom the five cohort studies are considered. 56% of the un-vaccinated pregnant women experience\ncomposite adverse maternal outcomes (RR: 3.97; 95% CI:0.73,21.49; p-value: ˂0.11). There was a\nreduced risk of occurrence of the meconium-stained amniotic fluid who are vaccinated (RR: 0.89;\n95% CI:0.71, 1.12; p value=0.33). The unvaccinated group is 3.16 times more likely to take infertility treatment (RR: 3.54; 95% CI:2.04, 6.12; p-value: ˂0.00001). There was no significant difference concerning neonatal outcomes between both groups. The pregnant women who were not vaccinated against SARS-CoV had an increased risk for a composite adverse maternal outcome and\nmeconium-stained amniotic fluid. The vaccine has effectively prevented the disease in the first six\nmonths. Additional studies are needed to understand the safety of the SARS-CoV vaccine.\n","PeriodicalId":10815,"journal":{"name":"Coronaviruses","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes after Vaccination with SARS-CoV-2: A\\nSystematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies\",\"authors\":\"Anand Vijayakumar Palur Ramakrishnan, R. Basutkar, Sugash Murugan, Shonitha Sagadevan, Oorvashree Sri Hari, Shanmuga Priyan\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0126667975269133231117062158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nSARS-CoV-2 infection among pregnant women causes maternal and neonatal complications. Professional societies endorse the vaccination among pregnant women. This review of the\\ncohort studies aims to assess the short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes among vaccinated vs.\\nnon-vaccinated pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We searched Cochrane Central\\nRegistry of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases. The observational\\ncohort studies published from July 2021 to December 2022 were included. The eligibility criteria\\nwere assessed. The studies documenting maternal and neonatal outcomes and the relative risk, and\\n95% confidence interval were considered. Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction form was used,\\nand the quality assessment of the included study was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. The quality of the grading was summarised with GradePro software. Data\\nfrom the five cohort studies are considered. 56% of the un-vaccinated pregnant women experience\\ncomposite adverse maternal outcomes (RR: 3.97; 95% CI:0.73,21.49; p-value: ˂0.11). There was a\\nreduced risk of occurrence of the meconium-stained amniotic fluid who are vaccinated (RR: 0.89;\\n95% CI:0.71, 1.12; p value=0.33). The unvaccinated group is 3.16 times more likely to take infertility treatment (RR: 3.54; 95% CI:2.04, 6.12; p-value: ˂0.00001). There was no significant difference concerning neonatal outcomes between both groups. The pregnant women who were not vaccinated against SARS-CoV had an increased risk for a composite adverse maternal outcome and\\nmeconium-stained amniotic fluid. The vaccine has effectively prevented the disease in the first six\\nmonths. Additional studies are needed to understand the safety of the SARS-CoV vaccine.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":10815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coronaviruses\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coronaviruses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667975269133231117062158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronaviruses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667975269133231117062158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes after Vaccination with SARS-CoV-2: A
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies
SARS-CoV-2 infection among pregnant women causes maternal and neonatal complications. Professional societies endorse the vaccination among pregnant women. This review of the
cohort studies aims to assess the short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes among vaccinated vs.
non-vaccinated pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We searched Cochrane Central
Registry of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases. The observational
cohort studies published from July 2021 to December 2022 were included. The eligibility criteria
were assessed. The studies documenting maternal and neonatal outcomes and the relative risk, and
95% confidence interval were considered. Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction form was used,
and the quality assessment of the included study was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. The quality of the grading was summarised with GradePro software. Data
from the five cohort studies are considered. 56% of the un-vaccinated pregnant women experience
composite adverse maternal outcomes (RR: 3.97; 95% CI:0.73,21.49; p-value: ˂0.11). There was a
reduced risk of occurrence of the meconium-stained amniotic fluid who are vaccinated (RR: 0.89;
95% CI:0.71, 1.12; p value=0.33). The unvaccinated group is 3.16 times more likely to take infertility treatment (RR: 3.54; 95% CI:2.04, 6.12; p-value: ˂0.00001). There was no significant difference concerning neonatal outcomes between both groups. The pregnant women who were not vaccinated against SARS-CoV had an increased risk for a composite adverse maternal outcome and
meconium-stained amniotic fluid. The vaccine has effectively prevented the disease in the first six
months. Additional studies are needed to understand the safety of the SARS-CoV vaccine.