一边嘲笑,一边处理有问题的表述:印度尼西亚民族志感性的讽刺意味

Q1 Arts and Humanities Anthropology and Humanism Pub Date : 2023-12-02 DOI:10.1111/anhu.12504
Geger Riyanto
{"title":"一边嘲笑,一边处理有问题的表述:印度尼西亚民族志感性的讽刺意味","authors":"Geger Riyanto","doi":"10.1111/anhu.12504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this essay, I contemplate the value of ethnography by reflecting on my experience and that of other anthropology-trained individuals who engage with public socio-ecological issues in Indonesia. While these issues are portrayed as urgent and are packaged with established representations of people and communities, ethnographic engagement produces representations that are at odds with them. Nevertheless, anthropology-trained individuals in Indonesia have no way to address these issues other than to work with institutions that produce the problematic representations, and in doing so, inadvertently contribute to their reproduction. Furthermore, the academic anthropology ecosystem does not support the exhaustive exploration of these issues. Eventually, the sensibility generated by the practice of ethnography becomes more of a latent sensibility, which is critical of the predominant representations. It evokes internal conflict and a sense of irony, which most of the time cannot be expressed or practically addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":53597,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Humanism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anhu.12504","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mocking while working with problematic representations: The irony of ethnographic sensibility in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Geger Riyanto\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anhu.12504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this essay, I contemplate the value of ethnography by reflecting on my experience and that of other anthropology-trained individuals who engage with public socio-ecological issues in Indonesia. While these issues are portrayed as urgent and are packaged with established representations of people and communities, ethnographic engagement produces representations that are at odds with them. Nevertheless, anthropology-trained individuals in Indonesia have no way to address these issues other than to work with institutions that produce the problematic representations, and in doing so, inadvertently contribute to their reproduction. Furthermore, the academic anthropology ecosystem does not support the exhaustive exploration of these issues. Eventually, the sensibility generated by the practice of ethnography becomes more of a latent sensibility, which is critical of the predominant representations. It evokes internal conflict and a sense of irony, which most of the time cannot be expressed or practically addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology and Humanism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anhu.12504\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology and Humanism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anhu.12504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Humanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anhu.12504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我通过反思我的经验和其他在印度尼西亚从事公共社会生态问题的受过人类学训练的个人的经验来思考民族志的价值。虽然这些问题被描述为紧迫的,并与人们和社区的既定代表包装在一起,但民族志参与产生的代表与他们不一致。然而,在印度尼西亚,受过人类学训练的个人除了与产生问题表征的机构合作之外,没有办法解决这些问题,这样做无意中助长了它们的繁殖。此外,学术人类学生态系统并不支持对这些问题进行详尽的探索。最终,由民族志实践产生的感性更多地成为一种潜在的感性,这是对主流表现的批判。它唤起了内心的冲突和一种讽刺的感觉,而这在大多数时候是无法表达或实际解决的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mocking while working with problematic representations: The irony of ethnographic sensibility in Indonesia

In this essay, I contemplate the value of ethnography by reflecting on my experience and that of other anthropology-trained individuals who engage with public socio-ecological issues in Indonesia. While these issues are portrayed as urgent and are packaged with established representations of people and communities, ethnographic engagement produces representations that are at odds with them. Nevertheless, anthropology-trained individuals in Indonesia have no way to address these issues other than to work with institutions that produce the problematic representations, and in doing so, inadvertently contribute to their reproduction. Furthermore, the academic anthropology ecosystem does not support the exhaustive exploration of these issues. Eventually, the sensibility generated by the practice of ethnography becomes more of a latent sensibility, which is critical of the predominant representations. It evokes internal conflict and a sense of irony, which most of the time cannot be expressed or practically addressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropology and Humanism
Anthropology and Humanism Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Hunger Aubergine time: A day in 1980s Romania Genre‐style features of modern war diaries: An analysis of Ukrainian military literature Issue Information Response: Mobile masculinities between streets and home
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1