公证法评论》中部分契约中公证人自我保护条款的使用

Misbah Imam Subari, Justicia Firdaus Kurniawan
{"title":"公证法评论》中部分契约中公证人自我保护条款的使用","authors":"Misbah Imam Subari, Justicia Firdaus Kurniawan","doi":"10.19184/jik.v4i2.44196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notary Public is an authorized official in making an authentic deed as referred to in Article 1 number 1 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position. Notarial Deed is not infrequently disputed by one of the parties or other parties because it is considered to be detrimental to its interests, so that now it is not uncommon for the Notary to be criminalized in connection with the Deed he made. This research is an Normatif jurudical research with a conceptual approach and a legislative approach. The legal material obtained in this article is then analyzed using prescriptive analytical methods. The results of the study that the use of a self-protection clause is legitimate used by the Notary, remembering that in the UUJN it does not regulate in accordance with the prohibition on using the self-protection clause. Implementation of an important self-protection clause as outlined in relation to both parties requires an identifying witness and concerns the Deed of Decision of the Meeting where the Notary is not present in person. Self protection clause can also be implemented based on Article 15 paragraph 2 letter e UUJN.","PeriodicalId":196521,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan","volume":"110 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penggunaan Klausula Proteksi Diri Bagi Notaris Dalam Akta Partij ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris\",\"authors\":\"Misbah Imam Subari, Justicia Firdaus Kurniawan\",\"doi\":\"10.19184/jik.v4i2.44196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Notary Public is an authorized official in making an authentic deed as referred to in Article 1 number 1 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position. Notarial Deed is not infrequently disputed by one of the parties or other parties because it is considered to be detrimental to its interests, so that now it is not uncommon for the Notary to be criminalized in connection with the Deed he made. This research is an Normatif jurudical research with a conceptual approach and a legislative approach. The legal material obtained in this article is then analyzed using prescriptive analytical methods. The results of the study that the use of a self-protection clause is legitimate used by the Notary, remembering that in the UUJN it does not regulate in accordance with the prohibition on using the self-protection clause. Implementation of an important self-protection clause as outlined in relation to both parties requires an identifying witness and concerns the Deed of Decision of the Meeting where the Notary is not present in person. Self protection clause can also be implemented based on Article 15 paragraph 2 letter e UUJN.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan\",\"volume\":\"110 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v4i2.44196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v4i2.44196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公证人是2014年第2号法律第1条第1款所述的制作真实契约的授权官员,该法律涉及2004年第30号法律关于公证职位的修正案。公证契约经常被一方当事人或其他当事人争议,因为它被认为损害了其利益,所以现在公证因其所做的契约而被定罪并不罕见。本研究是一项概念研究和立法研究相结合的规范性法律研究。然后,使用规定性分析方法对本文获得的法律材料进行分析。研究结果表明,使用自我保护条款是由公证人合法使用的,请记住,在ujn中,它没有根据禁止使用自我保护条款进行规范。执行与双方有关的重要自我保护条款需要一名身份证人,并涉及公证人未亲自出席的会议的决定契约。自我保护条款也可依第15条第2款之规定执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Penggunaan Klausula Proteksi Diri Bagi Notaris Dalam Akta Partij ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris
Notary Public is an authorized official in making an authentic deed as referred to in Article 1 number 1 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position. Notarial Deed is not infrequently disputed by one of the parties or other parties because it is considered to be detrimental to its interests, so that now it is not uncommon for the Notary to be criminalized in connection with the Deed he made. This research is an Normatif jurudical research with a conceptual approach and a legislative approach. The legal material obtained in this article is then analyzed using prescriptive analytical methods. The results of the study that the use of a self-protection clause is legitimate used by the Notary, remembering that in the UUJN it does not regulate in accordance with the prohibition on using the self-protection clause. Implementation of an important self-protection clause as outlined in relation to both parties requires an identifying witness and concerns the Deed of Decision of the Meeting where the Notary is not present in person. Self protection clause can also be implemented based on Article 15 paragraph 2 letter e UUJN.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urgensi Pembuatan Akta Kesaksian dan Akta Pernyataan Ahli Waris Oleh Notaris The Obligation of Notary as a Reporter in Efforts to Prevent and Eradicate Money Laundering Crime Akibat Hukum Penandatanganan Surat Kuasa Jual Mutlak Sebelum Debitor Mengalami Kredit Macet Bridging the Gap by Exploring Inequalities in Access to Land and Disparities in Agrarian Law in Indonesia Akibat Hukum Bagi Notaris Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1