{"title":"都柏林诉讼程序中的法律保护","authors":"J. Mösch, Preslava Chingova, Anna Roth","doi":"10.3256/978-3-03929-042-0_04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the status of legal protection in the Dublin procedure since the introduction of the last asylum revision. In this context, the consequences of the lack of accompaniment by legal representation of asylum seekers at Dublin interviews, which can be inferred from the recent case law of the Federal Administrative Court, as well as the conditions for the legal effectiveness of a waiver of accompaniment by legal representation are outlined.","PeriodicalId":496519,"journal":{"name":"ex/ante","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rechtsschutz im Dublin-Verfahren\",\"authors\":\"J. Mösch, Preslava Chingova, Anna Roth\",\"doi\":\"10.3256/978-3-03929-042-0_04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyses the status of legal protection in the Dublin procedure since the introduction of the last asylum revision. In this context, the consequences of the lack of accompaniment by legal representation of asylum seekers at Dublin interviews, which can be inferred from the recent case law of the Federal Administrative Court, as well as the conditions for the legal effectiveness of a waiver of accompaniment by legal representation are outlined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ex/ante\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ex/ante\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3256/978-3-03929-042-0_04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ex/ante","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3256/978-3-03929-042-0_04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article analyses the status of legal protection in the Dublin procedure since the introduction of the last asylum revision. In this context, the consequences of the lack of accompaniment by legal representation of asylum seekers at Dublin interviews, which can be inferred from the recent case law of the Federal Administrative Court, as well as the conditions for the legal effectiveness of a waiver of accompaniment by legal representation are outlined.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
