在线经济学课程与校内经济学课程的成功率差异

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Online Learning Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.24059/olj.v27i4.3447
Melanie G. Long, Karen Gebhardt, Kelly McKenna
{"title":"在线经济学课程与校内经济学课程的成功率差异","authors":"Melanie G. Long, Karen Gebhardt, Kelly McKenna","doi":"10.24059/olj.v27i4.3447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students enrolled in online courses tend to be less successful as measured by the rate of A’s, B’s, and C’s than students enrolled in face-to-face courses. Yet little work has been done addressing whether these gaps vary depending on students’ broader relationship with the university, including whether they are degree-seeking students and whether they take any face-to-face courses. We use institutional data on Economics enrollments between 2012 and 2018 at a mid-sized land-grant university to deconstruct online/face-to-face success gaps into a student’s term modality (or modalities) and institutional affiliation components. We identify these components by using a fixed effects regression methodology and comparing outcomes across four student groups: affiliated students who are enrolled in exclusively online courses, exclusively face-to-face courses, or in a mix of courses each term, as well as unaffiliated (external) students exclusively taking online courses. Although students in online courses are less successful on average, part of this gap is explained by the student’s institutional affiliation and whether they exclusively take online courses. External students are the least successful in online courses while students who are affiliated with the institution fare much better. We examine potential reasons for these patterns using survey data from several online courses. These findings suggest that institutions should take steps to ensure that institutional support services and activities exist and extend to students in online courses.","PeriodicalId":54195,"journal":{"name":"Online Learning","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Success Rate Disparities Between Online and On-campus Economics Courses\",\"authors\":\"Melanie G. Long, Karen Gebhardt, Kelly McKenna\",\"doi\":\"10.24059/olj.v27i4.3447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Students enrolled in online courses tend to be less successful as measured by the rate of A’s, B’s, and C’s than students enrolled in face-to-face courses. Yet little work has been done addressing whether these gaps vary depending on students’ broader relationship with the university, including whether they are degree-seeking students and whether they take any face-to-face courses. We use institutional data on Economics enrollments between 2012 and 2018 at a mid-sized land-grant university to deconstruct online/face-to-face success gaps into a student’s term modality (or modalities) and institutional affiliation components. We identify these components by using a fixed effects regression methodology and comparing outcomes across four student groups: affiliated students who are enrolled in exclusively online courses, exclusively face-to-face courses, or in a mix of courses each term, as well as unaffiliated (external) students exclusively taking online courses. Although students in online courses are less successful on average, part of this gap is explained by the student’s institutional affiliation and whether they exclusively take online courses. External students are the least successful in online courses while students who are affiliated with the institution fare much better. We examine potential reasons for these patterns using survey data from several online courses. These findings suggest that institutions should take steps to ensure that institutional support services and activities exist and extend to students in online courses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online Learning\",\"volume\":\" 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i4.3447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i4.3447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与参加面对面课程的学生相比,参加在线课程的学生往往不如参加面对面课程的学生取得A、B和C的成绩。然而,关于这些差距是否取决于学生与大学的更广泛关系(包括他们是否是攻读学位的学生,以及他们是否参加了任何面对面的课程)的问题,几乎没有人做过研究。我们使用了一所中等规模赠地大学2012年至2018年经济学入学的机构数据,将在线/面对面的成功差距解构为学生的学期模式(或模式)和机构隶属成分。我们通过使用固定效应回归方法来确定这些组成部分,并比较四个学生组的结果:专门参加在线课程的附属学生,专门参加面对面课程,或每学期参加混合课程,以及专门参加在线课程的非附属(外部)学生。尽管在线课程的学生平均成绩较差,但这种差距的部分原因是学生所在的院校以及他们是否只上在线课程。外部学生在在线课程中最不成功,而学校的学生表现要好得多。我们使用来自几个在线课程的调查数据来检查这些模式的潜在原因。这些发现表明,院校应采取措施,确保院校支持服务和活动的存在,并将其扩展到在线课程的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Success Rate Disparities Between Online and On-campus Economics Courses
Students enrolled in online courses tend to be less successful as measured by the rate of A’s, B’s, and C’s than students enrolled in face-to-face courses. Yet little work has been done addressing whether these gaps vary depending on students’ broader relationship with the university, including whether they are degree-seeking students and whether they take any face-to-face courses. We use institutional data on Economics enrollments between 2012 and 2018 at a mid-sized land-grant university to deconstruct online/face-to-face success gaps into a student’s term modality (or modalities) and institutional affiliation components. We identify these components by using a fixed effects regression methodology and comparing outcomes across four student groups: affiliated students who are enrolled in exclusively online courses, exclusively face-to-face courses, or in a mix of courses each term, as well as unaffiliated (external) students exclusively taking online courses. Although students in online courses are less successful on average, part of this gap is explained by the student’s institutional affiliation and whether they exclusively take online courses. External students are the least successful in online courses while students who are affiliated with the institution fare much better. We examine potential reasons for these patterns using survey data from several online courses. These findings suggest that institutions should take steps to ensure that institutional support services and activities exist and extend to students in online courses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Online Learning
Online Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Emergent Themes from Study of a Highly Flexible Hybrid Learning Program Culturally- and Linguistically-Responsive Online Teacher Learning Professional Development "I Sing the Body Electric": Embodied Presence in the Community of Inquiry Framework Measuring Faculty Engagement in Online Formative or Whole-Person Education “But They’re Grad Students, They Should Know This”: Preliminary Findings from a Writing Center’s Hybrid Approach to Supporting Postgraduates in Qatar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1