使用磁共振成像扫描进行内窥镜鼻窦手术的可行性

R. Landsberg, J. Luckman, A. Yakirevitch, A. Margulis, M. Masalha, M. Masarwa, S. Schneider
{"title":"使用磁共振成像扫描进行内窥镜鼻窦手术的可行性","authors":"R. Landsberg, J. Luckman, A. Yakirevitch, A. Margulis, M. Masalha, M. Masarwa, S. Schneider","doi":"10.4193/rhinol/23.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that an adjusted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol could be used as an alternative for assessing most bony paranasal and vital structures. Here, we aimed to determine the feasibility of using this protocol during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). METHODS: Three experienced rhinologists used an adjusted MRI scan to plan and perform ESS. They were blinded to the CT images and observed them only postoperatively. They also completed a detailed questionnaire about their experience. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with CRS (60.5% with polyps and 39.5% without polyps) were included in the study. MRI navigation was used in 58.3% and 33.3% of surgeries performed by surgeon #1 and #2, respectively. The median Lund-Mackay score was 12 (interquartile range 2-24). None of the surgeons switched entirely to using CT scans during the procedure; No intra or postoperative complications were observed. Two surgeons reported that it was convenient to work with the MRI scans to visualize all nasal sinuses, but the third surgeon found MRI scans convenient for visualizing the frontal sinus. MRI convenience was considered superior to CT in 7 cases (16.3%), the same as CT in 29 cases (67.4%), and inferior to CT in 7 cases (16.3%). All three surgeons agreed that using MRI scans intraoperatively for ESS is safe and comparable to using CT scans. CONCLUSION: MRI is a well-suited modality for planning and performing ESS. Rhinologists would be able to rely on it in specific and highly selected indications.","PeriodicalId":74737,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology online","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The feasibility of using magnetic resonance imaging scans for endoscopic sinus surgery\",\"authors\":\"R. Landsberg, J. Luckman, A. Yakirevitch, A. Margulis, M. Masalha, M. Masarwa, S. Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.4193/rhinol/23.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that an adjusted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol could be used as an alternative for assessing most bony paranasal and vital structures. Here, we aimed to determine the feasibility of using this protocol during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). METHODS: Three experienced rhinologists used an adjusted MRI scan to plan and perform ESS. They were blinded to the CT images and observed them only postoperatively. They also completed a detailed questionnaire about their experience. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with CRS (60.5% with polyps and 39.5% without polyps) were included in the study. MRI navigation was used in 58.3% and 33.3% of surgeries performed by surgeon #1 and #2, respectively. The median Lund-Mackay score was 12 (interquartile range 2-24). None of the surgeons switched entirely to using CT scans during the procedure; No intra or postoperative complications were observed. Two surgeons reported that it was convenient to work with the MRI scans to visualize all nasal sinuses, but the third surgeon found MRI scans convenient for visualizing the frontal sinus. MRI convenience was considered superior to CT in 7 cases (16.3%), the same as CT in 29 cases (67.4%), and inferior to CT in 7 cases (16.3%). All three surgeons agreed that using MRI scans intraoperatively for ESS is safe and comparable to using CT scans. CONCLUSION: MRI is a well-suited modality for planning and performing ESS. Rhinologists would be able to rely on it in specific and highly selected indications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhinology online\",\"volume\":\" 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhinology online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4193/rhinol/23.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/rhinol/23.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们之前已经表明,调整后的磁共振成像(MRI)方案可以作为评估大多数骨旁和重要结构的替代方案。在这里,我们的目的是确定在慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)患者的内窥镜鼻窦手术(ESS)中使用该方案的可行性。方法:三名经验丰富的鼻科医生使用调整后的MRI扫描来计划和实施ESS。他们对CT图像不知情,仅在术后观察。他们还完成了一份关于他们经历的详细问卷。结果:43例CRS患者纳入研究,其中60.5%合并息肉,39.5%未合并息肉。由外科医生#1和#2进行的手术中,分别有58.3%和33.3%使用MRI导航。Lund-Mackay评分中位数为12(四分位数范围2-24)。在手术过程中,没有一位外科医生完全转向使用CT扫描;无术中及术后并发症。两名外科医生报告说,MRI扫描可以方便地显示所有鼻窦,但第三名外科医生发现MRI扫描可以方便地显示额窦。MRI便捷性优于CT 7例(16.3%),优于CT 29例(67.4%),优于CT 7例(16.3%)。三位外科医生一致认为,术中使用MRI扫描检查ESS是安全的,与使用CT扫描相当。结论:MRI是一种非常适合计划和实施ESS的方法。鼻科医生将能够在特定和高度选择的适应症中依赖它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The feasibility of using magnetic resonance imaging scans for endoscopic sinus surgery
BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that an adjusted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol could be used as an alternative for assessing most bony paranasal and vital structures. Here, we aimed to determine the feasibility of using this protocol during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). METHODS: Three experienced rhinologists used an adjusted MRI scan to plan and perform ESS. They were blinded to the CT images and observed them only postoperatively. They also completed a detailed questionnaire about their experience. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with CRS (60.5% with polyps and 39.5% without polyps) were included in the study. MRI navigation was used in 58.3% and 33.3% of surgeries performed by surgeon #1 and #2, respectively. The median Lund-Mackay score was 12 (interquartile range 2-24). None of the surgeons switched entirely to using CT scans during the procedure; No intra or postoperative complications were observed. Two surgeons reported that it was convenient to work with the MRI scans to visualize all nasal sinuses, but the third surgeon found MRI scans convenient for visualizing the frontal sinus. MRI convenience was considered superior to CT in 7 cases (16.3%), the same as CT in 29 cases (67.4%), and inferior to CT in 7 cases (16.3%). All three surgeons agreed that using MRI scans intraoperatively for ESS is safe and comparable to using CT scans. CONCLUSION: MRI is a well-suited modality for planning and performing ESS. Rhinologists would be able to rely on it in specific and highly selected indications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 control protocol for rhinologic surgery Trends in dupilumab persistence among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps Dupilumab as an emerging treatment for refractory allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: a case series and literature review Capturing qualitative olfactory dysfunction with PARPHAIT: the parosmia, phantosmia, and anosmia test Prevalence of smell and taste dysfunction in different clinical severity groups of COVID-19 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1