瑞士对法官国家的恐惧为何毫无根据

P. Scheurer, Lucien Käslin-Tanduo
{"title":"瑞士对法官国家的恐惧为何毫无根据","authors":"P. Scheurer, Lucien Käslin-Tanduo","doi":"10.3256/978-3-03929-042-0_07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using Germany as an example, the paper derives that a strong constitutional jurisdiction with a comprehensive review competence does not lead to a judge-state that undermines democratic processes. Rather, such a constitutional jurisdiction safeguards the principle of democracy, in particular by addressing the concerns of minorities. The paper shows that the often diffuse fear of strengthening constitutional jurisdiction is unfounded and should therefore be considered as a possible concept for the further development of the Swiss constitutional system.","PeriodicalId":496519,"journal":{"name":"ex/ante","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wieso die Schweizer Angst vor dem Richterstaat unbegründet ist\",\"authors\":\"P. Scheurer, Lucien Käslin-Tanduo\",\"doi\":\"10.3256/978-3-03929-042-0_07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using Germany as an example, the paper derives that a strong constitutional jurisdiction with a comprehensive review competence does not lead to a judge-state that undermines democratic processes. Rather, such a constitutional jurisdiction safeguards the principle of democracy, in particular by addressing the concerns of minorities. The paper shows that the often diffuse fear of strengthening constitutional jurisdiction is unfounded and should therefore be considered as a possible concept for the further development of the Swiss constitutional system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ex/ante\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ex/ante\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3256/978-3-03929-042-0_07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ex/ante","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3256/978-3-03929-042-0_07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以德国为例,本文得出结论,具有全面审查能力的强有力的宪法管辖权不会导致破坏民主进程的法官国家。相反,这种宪法管辖保障了民主原则,特别是解决了少数人的关切。该文件表明,经常弥漫的对加强宪法管辖权的恐惧是没有根据的,因此应将其视为瑞士宪法制度进一步发展的一个可能概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wieso die Schweizer Angst vor dem Richterstaat unbegründet ist
Using Germany as an example, the paper derives that a strong constitutional jurisdiction with a comprehensive review competence does not lead to a judge-state that undermines democratic processes. Rather, such a constitutional jurisdiction safeguards the principle of democracy, in particular by addressing the concerns of minorities. The paper shows that the often diffuse fear of strengthening constitutional jurisdiction is unfounded and should therefore be considered as a possible concept for the further development of the Swiss constitutional system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
St.Galler Tagung für den wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchs im Gesellschaftsrecht Die Abtretung und der gutgläubige Erwerb von Personaldienstbarkeiten ohne eigenes Grundbuchblatt L’accommodement raisonnable comme nouvel outil dans la lutte contre la discrimination Acquiescement : étude de droit international public Deliktsrechtliche Klimaklagen in der Schweiz
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1