城市森林的情感地理:电子邮件植树倡议的启示

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geographical Research Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1111/1745-5871.12626
Jennifer Atchison, Chris Brennan-Horley, Catherine Phillips, Kim Doyle, Anna Lewis, Elizabeth Straughan
{"title":"城市森林的情感地理:电子邮件植树倡议的启示","authors":"Jennifer Atchison,&nbsp;Chris Brennan-Horley,&nbsp;Catherine Phillips,&nbsp;Kim Doyle,&nbsp;Anna Lewis,&nbsp;Elizabeth Straughan","doi":"10.1111/1745-5871.12626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>International and national policies are being used to prioritise increases in urban forest coverage and diversity, support equitable access to urban greenspaces, and advance sound environmental governance outcomes. Yet, the relationship between people’s feelings about urban trees and public policy remains under-examined. Drawing on a unique dataset from an email-a-tree initiative, the objectives of this study were to identify how concern and connection for urban trees is expressed and determine how insights from the initiative might inform urban forest governance. We examined emails sent to trees using a mixed-methods approach that included qualitative coding, VADER sentiment analysis, and statistical and spatial analyses. We identified and considered three themes based on emails sent by members of the public and municipal tree inventory data. Those themes were location, age and loss, and type. In accord with other studies, overall sentiment for urban trees was positive and underscored people’s strong connections with trees, often based on routine and repeated engagements. However, people noticed and were concerned about a limited range of trees and tree types in urban settings. Based in Melbourne, Australia, our case study shows how examining feelings for trees helps residents and researchers understand urban tree relationships and gauge how those designing public engagement programs might learn from such an initiative to create meaningful opportunities for active participation in governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47233,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Research","volume":"62 1","pages":"97-116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1745-5871.12626","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotional geographies of an urban forest: Insights from an email-a-tree initiative\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Atchison,&nbsp;Chris Brennan-Horley,&nbsp;Catherine Phillips,&nbsp;Kim Doyle,&nbsp;Anna Lewis,&nbsp;Elizabeth Straughan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1745-5871.12626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>International and national policies are being used to prioritise increases in urban forest coverage and diversity, support equitable access to urban greenspaces, and advance sound environmental governance outcomes. Yet, the relationship between people’s feelings about urban trees and public policy remains under-examined. Drawing on a unique dataset from an email-a-tree initiative, the objectives of this study were to identify how concern and connection for urban trees is expressed and determine how insights from the initiative might inform urban forest governance. We examined emails sent to trees using a mixed-methods approach that included qualitative coding, VADER sentiment analysis, and statistical and spatial analyses. We identified and considered three themes based on emails sent by members of the public and municipal tree inventory data. Those themes were location, age and loss, and type. In accord with other studies, overall sentiment for urban trees was positive and underscored people’s strong connections with trees, often based on routine and repeated engagements. However, people noticed and were concerned about a limited range of trees and tree types in urban settings. Based in Melbourne, Australia, our case study shows how examining feelings for trees helps residents and researchers understand urban tree relationships and gauge how those designing public engagement programs might learn from such an initiative to create meaningful opportunities for active participation in governance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geographical Research\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"97-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1745-5871.12626\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geographical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-5871.12626\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-5871.12626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国际和国家政策正被用于优先增加城市森林覆盖率和多样性,支持城市绿色空间的公平获取,并推进良好的环境治理成果。然而,人们对城市树木的感受与公共政策之间的关系仍未得到充分研究。利用来自“email-a-tree”倡议的独特数据集,本研究的目标是确定对城市树木的关注和联系是如何表达的,并确定该倡议的见解如何为城市森林治理提供信息。我们使用混合方法检查了发送给树木的电子邮件,包括定性编码、维德情绪分析、统计和空间分析。我们根据公众发送的电子邮件和市政树木清单数据确定并考虑了三个主题。这些主题是地点,年龄和损失,以及类型。与其他研究一致,人们对城市树木的总体看法是积极的,并强调了人们与树木的紧密联系,这种联系通常是基于日常和重复的接触。然而,人们注意到并担心城市环境中有限的树木和树木类型。我们的案例研究以澳大利亚墨尔本为基地,展示了对树木的感受如何帮助居民和研究人员理解城市树木的关系,并衡量那些设计公共参与项目的人如何从这样的倡议中学习,为积极参与治理创造有意义的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emotional geographies of an urban forest: Insights from an email-a-tree initiative

International and national policies are being used to prioritise increases in urban forest coverage and diversity, support equitable access to urban greenspaces, and advance sound environmental governance outcomes. Yet, the relationship between people’s feelings about urban trees and public policy remains under-examined. Drawing on a unique dataset from an email-a-tree initiative, the objectives of this study were to identify how concern and connection for urban trees is expressed and determine how insights from the initiative might inform urban forest governance. We examined emails sent to trees using a mixed-methods approach that included qualitative coding, VADER sentiment analysis, and statistical and spatial analyses. We identified and considered three themes based on emails sent by members of the public and municipal tree inventory data. Those themes were location, age and loss, and type. In accord with other studies, overall sentiment for urban trees was positive and underscored people’s strong connections with trees, often based on routine and repeated engagements. However, people noticed and were concerned about a limited range of trees and tree types in urban settings. Based in Melbourne, Australia, our case study shows how examining feelings for trees helps residents and researchers understand urban tree relationships and gauge how those designing public engagement programs might learn from such an initiative to create meaningful opportunities for active participation in governance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
12.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Issue Information For everything there is a season … The power of trees: How ancient forests can save us if we let them By Peter Wohlleben, Collingwood: Black Inc. 2023. pp. 271. Vic. 9781760643621 (paperback), 9781743822869 (hardback) Obituary: Janice Monk We are Country—Country mentors us
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1