爱尔兰小学教育不平等趋势:基于 TIMSS 数据的分析(2011-2019 年)

IF 2.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Large-Scale Assessments in Education Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1186/s40536-023-00188-2
Alice Duggan, Anastasios Karakolidis, Aidan Clerkin, Lorraine Gilleece, Rachel Perkins
{"title":"爱尔兰小学教育不平等趋势:基于 TIMSS 数据的分析(2011-2019 年)","authors":"Alice Duggan, Anastasios Karakolidis, Aidan Clerkin, Lorraine Gilleece, Rachel Perkins","doi":"10.1186/s40536-023-00188-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Socioeconomic characteristics are persistently and systematically related to academic outcomes, despite long-standing efforts to reduce educational inequality. Ireland has a strong policy focus on alleviating educational disadvantage and has seen significant improvements in mathematics and science performance in recent years. This study investigates patterns of socioeconomic inequalities in 4th grade students’ performance in mathematics and science between 2011 and 2019. Two measures of inequality are examined: (i) inequality of achievement, i.e., the degree of variability in student performance and (ii) inequality of opportunity, i.e., the extent to which student performance is related to background characteristics.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Data for 4th-grade students in Ireland from TIMSS 2011, TIMSS 2015 and TIMSS 2019 were used. Mathematics and science achievement were the main outcome measures. The home resources for learning index was used as a proxy for student-level socioeconomic status. School-level socioeconomic status was examined according to schools’ participation in the <i>Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools</i> (DEIS) programme, which is the Department of Education’s main policy initiative addressing educational disadvantage. Descriptive and multilevel regression analyses were conducted to explore variability in student performance and to investigate the variance in achievement explained by socioeconomic factors, across cycles and subjects.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Between 2011 and 2015, between-student and between-school differences in mathematics and science performance became smaller, as shown by the decrease in standard deviations and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). This points to reduced inequality of achievement. Between 2015 and 2019, a small increase in inequality of achievement was observed.</p><p>Regarding inequality of opportunity, students’ home resources for learning and school disadvantaged status were statistically significantly related to mathematics and science achievement across all three cycles. Overall variance explained by these two variables increased from 2011 to 2019. This points towards increasing inequality of opportunity over the period examined.</p><p>Performance gaps between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged schools have been reduced over time; however, the relationship between home resources for learning and achievement appears to have strengthened. Findings were consistent for both subjects.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The findings indicate that improvements in overall performance do not necessarily reflect improved equality. Ireland’s improvements in average mathematics and science performance between 2011 and 2015 were accompanied by reduced inequality of achievement. Performance differences between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged schools have been reduced over time, suggesting that the DEIS policy is meeting its goal of narrowing achievement gaps based on concentrations of educational disadvantage. However, inequality of opportunity linked to student-level socioeconomic factors (i.e., home resources for learning) appears to have increased over time. These findings are valuable in the context of measuring and tracking educational inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":37009,"journal":{"name":"Large-Scale Assessments in Education","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in educational inequalities in Ireland’s primary schools: an analysis based on TIMSS data (2011–2019)\",\"authors\":\"Alice Duggan, Anastasios Karakolidis, Aidan Clerkin, Lorraine Gilleece, Rachel Perkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40536-023-00188-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Socioeconomic characteristics are persistently and systematically related to academic outcomes, despite long-standing efforts to reduce educational inequality. Ireland has a strong policy focus on alleviating educational disadvantage and has seen significant improvements in mathematics and science performance in recent years. This study investigates patterns of socioeconomic inequalities in 4th grade students’ performance in mathematics and science between 2011 and 2019. Two measures of inequality are examined: (i) inequality of achievement, i.e., the degree of variability in student performance and (ii) inequality of opportunity, i.e., the extent to which student performance is related to background characteristics.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Data for 4th-grade students in Ireland from TIMSS 2011, TIMSS 2015 and TIMSS 2019 were used. Mathematics and science achievement were the main outcome measures. The home resources for learning index was used as a proxy for student-level socioeconomic status. School-level socioeconomic status was examined according to schools’ participation in the <i>Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools</i> (DEIS) programme, which is the Department of Education’s main policy initiative addressing educational disadvantage. Descriptive and multilevel regression analyses were conducted to explore variability in student performance and to investigate the variance in achievement explained by socioeconomic factors, across cycles and subjects.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Between 2011 and 2015, between-student and between-school differences in mathematics and science performance became smaller, as shown by the decrease in standard deviations and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). This points to reduced inequality of achievement. Between 2015 and 2019, a small increase in inequality of achievement was observed.</p><p>Regarding inequality of opportunity, students’ home resources for learning and school disadvantaged status were statistically significantly related to mathematics and science achievement across all three cycles. Overall variance explained by these two variables increased from 2011 to 2019. This points towards increasing inequality of opportunity over the period examined.</p><p>Performance gaps between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged schools have been reduced over time; however, the relationship between home resources for learning and achievement appears to have strengthened. Findings were consistent for both subjects.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>The findings indicate that improvements in overall performance do not necessarily reflect improved equality. Ireland’s improvements in average mathematics and science performance between 2011 and 2015 were accompanied by reduced inequality of achievement. Performance differences between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged schools have been reduced over time, suggesting that the DEIS policy is meeting its goal of narrowing achievement gaps based on concentrations of educational disadvantage. However, inequality of opportunity linked to student-level socioeconomic factors (i.e., home resources for learning) appears to have increased over time. These findings are valuable in the context of measuring and tracking educational inequalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Large-Scale Assessments in Education\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Large-Scale Assessments in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00188-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Large-Scale Assessments in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00188-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管长期以来一直在努力减少教育不平等,但社会经济特征与学业成绩之间存在着持续和系统的关系。爱尔兰的政策重点是减轻教育劣势,近年来在数学和科学成绩方面取得了显著进步。本研究调查了2011年至2019年四年级学生数学和科学成绩的社会经济不平等模式。研究了不平等的两个衡量标准:(i)成就的不平等,即学生表现的可变性程度;(ii)机会的不平等,即学生表现与背景特征相关的程度。方法采用TIMSS 2011、TIMSS 2015和TIMSS 2019中的爱尔兰四年级学生数据。数学和科学成绩是主要的结果衡量标准。以家庭学习资源指数作为衡量学生社会经济地位的指标。学校一级的社会经济地位是根据学校参与实现学校机会平等方案来审查的,该方案是教育部解决教育劣势的主要政策倡议。采用描述性和多水平回归分析来探索学生表现的可变性,并调查不同周期和科目的社会经济因素解释的成就差异。结果2011年至2015年间,学生之间和学校之间的数学和科学成绩差异变小,体现在标准差和班级内相关系数(ICCs)的下降上。这表明成就的不平等有所减少。在2015年至2019年期间,观察到成就不平等的小幅增加。在机会不平等方面,学生的家庭学习资源和学校不利地位与数学和科学成绩在三个周期中都有统计学显著相关。从2011年到2019年,这两个变量解释的总体方差有所增加。这表明,在调查期间,机会不平等日益加剧。随着时间的推移,弱势学校和非弱势学校之间的成绩差距已经缩小;然而,家庭学习资源与成就之间的关系似乎有所加强。这两个研究对象的发现是一致的。研究结果表明,整体表现的提高并不一定反映了平等程度的提高。2011年至2015年间,爱尔兰平均数学和科学成绩的提高伴随着成绩不平等的减少。随着时间的推移,弱势学校和非弱势学校之间的成绩差距已经缩小,这表明DEIS政策正在实现其缩小基于教育劣势集中的成绩差距的目标。然而,与学生层面的社会经济因素(即家庭学习资源)相关的机会不平等似乎随着时间的推移而增加。这些发现在衡量和跟踪教育不平等的背景下是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends in educational inequalities in Ireland’s primary schools: an analysis based on TIMSS data (2011–2019)

Background

Socioeconomic characteristics are persistently and systematically related to academic outcomes, despite long-standing efforts to reduce educational inequality. Ireland has a strong policy focus on alleviating educational disadvantage and has seen significant improvements in mathematics and science performance in recent years. This study investigates patterns of socioeconomic inequalities in 4th grade students’ performance in mathematics and science between 2011 and 2019. Two measures of inequality are examined: (i) inequality of achievement, i.e., the degree of variability in student performance and (ii) inequality of opportunity, i.e., the extent to which student performance is related to background characteristics.

Methods

Data for 4th-grade students in Ireland from TIMSS 2011, TIMSS 2015 and TIMSS 2019 were used. Mathematics and science achievement were the main outcome measures. The home resources for learning index was used as a proxy for student-level socioeconomic status. School-level socioeconomic status was examined according to schools’ participation in the Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools (DEIS) programme, which is the Department of Education’s main policy initiative addressing educational disadvantage. Descriptive and multilevel regression analyses were conducted to explore variability in student performance and to investigate the variance in achievement explained by socioeconomic factors, across cycles and subjects.

Results

Between 2011 and 2015, between-student and between-school differences in mathematics and science performance became smaller, as shown by the decrease in standard deviations and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). This points to reduced inequality of achievement. Between 2015 and 2019, a small increase in inequality of achievement was observed.

Regarding inequality of opportunity, students’ home resources for learning and school disadvantaged status were statistically significantly related to mathematics and science achievement across all three cycles. Overall variance explained by these two variables increased from 2011 to 2019. This points towards increasing inequality of opportunity over the period examined.

Performance gaps between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged schools have been reduced over time; however, the relationship between home resources for learning and achievement appears to have strengthened. Findings were consistent for both subjects.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that improvements in overall performance do not necessarily reflect improved equality. Ireland’s improvements in average mathematics and science performance between 2011 and 2015 were accompanied by reduced inequality of achievement. Performance differences between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged schools have been reduced over time, suggesting that the DEIS policy is meeting its goal of narrowing achievement gaps based on concentrations of educational disadvantage. However, inequality of opportunity linked to student-level socioeconomic factors (i.e., home resources for learning) appears to have increased over time. These findings are valuable in the context of measuring and tracking educational inequalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Large-Scale Assessments in Education
Large-Scale Assessments in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
16
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of student ICT competence according to mathematics, science, and reading literacy: evidence from PISA 2018 Teacher-centered analysis with TIMSS and PIRLS data: weighting approaches, accuracy, and precision Secondary school students’ attitudes of tolerance towards minorities Participation rates, characteristics, and differential effects on reading literacy of extracurricular tutoring in a German large-scale assessment Teaching practices and organisational aspects associated with the use of ICT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1