PP147 真实世界证据(RWE)能为澳大利亚卫生技术评估(HTA)程序带来什么?

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1017/s0266462323002519
Gabrielle Challis, Michelle Hill, Liesl Strachan, Kate King, Shajedur Rahman Shawon, Oluwadamisola Sotade, Louisa Jorm
{"title":"PP147 真实世界证据(RWE)能为澳大利亚卫生技术评估(HTA)程序带来什么?","authors":"Gabrielle Challis, Michelle Hill, Liesl Strachan, Kate King, Shajedur Rahman Shawon, Oluwadamisola Sotade, Louisa Jorm","doi":"10.1017/s0266462323002519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Introduction</span><p>Medical device health technology assessment (HTA) in Australia is largely coordinated by the Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC). Its remit to improve the public’s health by deciding where to allocate public healthcare funding, can be enhanced by considering real world evidence (RWE). Existing data sources have limitations that can be addressed through RWE, including coverage of Australian patient populations who may not meet trial eligibility criteria, and long-term follow-up through data linkage and datasets. We partnered with a university to explore what information could be gained from an analysis of linked administrative patient data, with a view to addressing current evidence gaps and/or limitations. The findings can be used as a source of local data to define patient populations, estimate actual costs of care, and enable more comprehensive economic modeling to inform medical device HTA.</p><span>Methods</span><p>The University-developed New South Wales Cardiovascular Cohort dataset, comprising person-level longitudinal NSW administrative data for all patients admitted to hospital with a cardiovascular diagnosis from 2001 onwards, linked to national Medicare Benefits Schedule and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme claims data, was interrogated.</p><span>Results</span><p>Working with RWE is resource intensive in terms of time and costs. The potential of these data was revealed as the research progressed. It was possible to continually refine the data analyzed and reported,as well as expand the data requested. Varied expertise is required to accurately analyze the administrative datasets, particularly clinical classification skills and expertise in methods for causal inference using observational data. Findings from this study will enable the refinement of information for MSAC submissions, including identifying the most relevant patient population and reporting comprehensive costs, beyond an admitted hospital setting. The data will enhance engagement with clinicians and refine messaging, for example regarding patient risk factors.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>RWE enhances Australian HTA applications. Local data, extended periods of time and insights not apparent from a focus on admitted hospital episodes can be revealed. Data can be refined during the process for specificity and applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PP147 What Does Real World Evidence (RWE) Offer Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Procedures In Australia?\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle Challis, Michelle Hill, Liesl Strachan, Kate King, Shajedur Rahman Shawon, Oluwadamisola Sotade, Louisa Jorm\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0266462323002519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span>Introduction</span><p>Medical device health technology assessment (HTA) in Australia is largely coordinated by the Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC). Its remit to improve the public’s health by deciding where to allocate public healthcare funding, can be enhanced by considering real world evidence (RWE). Existing data sources have limitations that can be addressed through RWE, including coverage of Australian patient populations who may not meet trial eligibility criteria, and long-term follow-up through data linkage and datasets. We partnered with a university to explore what information could be gained from an analysis of linked administrative patient data, with a view to addressing current evidence gaps and/or limitations. The findings can be used as a source of local data to define patient populations, estimate actual costs of care, and enable more comprehensive economic modeling to inform medical device HTA.</p><span>Methods</span><p>The University-developed New South Wales Cardiovascular Cohort dataset, comprising person-level longitudinal NSW administrative data for all patients admitted to hospital with a cardiovascular diagnosis from 2001 onwards, linked to national Medicare Benefits Schedule and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme claims data, was interrogated.</p><span>Results</span><p>Working with RWE is resource intensive in terms of time and costs. The potential of these data was revealed as the research progressed. It was possible to continually refine the data analyzed and reported,as well as expand the data requested. Varied expertise is required to accurately analyze the administrative datasets, particularly clinical classification skills and expertise in methods for causal inference using observational data. Findings from this study will enable the refinement of information for MSAC submissions, including identifying the most relevant patient population and reporting comprehensive costs, beyond an admitted hospital setting. The data will enhance engagement with clinicians and refine messaging, for example regarding patient risk factors.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>RWE enhances Australian HTA applications. Local data, extended periods of time and insights not apparent from a focus on admitted hospital episodes can be revealed. Data can be refined during the process for specificity and applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323002519\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323002519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚的医疗器械健康技术评估(HTA)主要由医疗服务咨询委员会(MSAC)协调。它的职责是通过决定在何处分配公共医疗保健资金来改善公众健康,这可以通过考虑现实世界证据(RWE)来加强。现有的数据来源有局限性,可以通过RWE解决,包括覆盖可能不符合试验资格标准的澳大利亚患者群体,以及通过数据链接和数据集进行长期随访。我们与一所大学合作,探索可以从相关行政患者数据的分析中获得哪些信息,以解决当前证据的差距和/或局限性。这些发现可以作为本地数据的来源,用于定义患者群体,估计实际护理成本,并使更全面的经济建模能够为医疗器械HTA提供信息。方法:研究了新南威尔士州大学开发的心血管队列数据集,包括2001年以来所有心血管诊断入院患者的个人水平纵向新南威尔士州行政数据,与国家医疗保险福利计划和药品福利计划索赔数据相关联。结果与莱茵集团合作在时间和成本上都是资源密集型的。随着研究的进展,这些数据的潜力被揭示出来。可以不断改进分析和报告的数据,并扩展所要求的数据。准确分析管理数据集需要不同的专业知识,特别是临床分类技能和使用观察数据进行因果推理方法的专业知识。这项研究的结果将有助于改进MSAC提交的信息,包括确定最相关的患者群体和报告住院医院以外的综合成本。这些数据将加强与临床医生的接触,并改进信息传递,例如关于患者风险因素的信息传递。结论srwe增强了澳大利亚HTA的应用。本地数据、较长的时间段和对住院事件的关注所不明显的见解可以被揭示出来。在此过程中,可以对数据进行细化,以获得特异性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PP147 What Does Real World Evidence (RWE) Offer Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Procedures In Australia?
Introduction

Medical device health technology assessment (HTA) in Australia is largely coordinated by the Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC). Its remit to improve the public’s health by deciding where to allocate public healthcare funding, can be enhanced by considering real world evidence (RWE). Existing data sources have limitations that can be addressed through RWE, including coverage of Australian patient populations who may not meet trial eligibility criteria, and long-term follow-up through data linkage and datasets. We partnered with a university to explore what information could be gained from an analysis of linked administrative patient data, with a view to addressing current evidence gaps and/or limitations. The findings can be used as a source of local data to define patient populations, estimate actual costs of care, and enable more comprehensive economic modeling to inform medical device HTA.

Methods

The University-developed New South Wales Cardiovascular Cohort dataset, comprising person-level longitudinal NSW administrative data for all patients admitted to hospital with a cardiovascular diagnosis from 2001 onwards, linked to national Medicare Benefits Schedule and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme claims data, was interrogated.

Results

Working with RWE is resource intensive in terms of time and costs. The potential of these data was revealed as the research progressed. It was possible to continually refine the data analyzed and reported,as well as expand the data requested. Varied expertise is required to accurately analyze the administrative datasets, particularly clinical classification skills and expertise in methods for causal inference using observational data. Findings from this study will enable the refinement of information for MSAC submissions, including identifying the most relevant patient population and reporting comprehensive costs, beyond an admitted hospital setting. The data will enhance engagement with clinicians and refine messaging, for example regarding patient risk factors.

Conclusions

RWE enhances Australian HTA applications. Local data, extended periods of time and insights not apparent from a focus on admitted hospital episodes can be revealed. Data can be refined during the process for specificity and applicability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
期刊最新文献
Development of an MCDA Framework for Rare Disease Reimbursement Prioritization in Malaysia. Experiences of patient organizations' involvement in medicine appraisal and reimbursement processes in Finland - a qualitative study. PP78 Real-World Trends And Medical Costs Of Stroke After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation In Korea: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study Can requests for real-world evidence by the French HTA body be planned? An exhaustive retrospective case-control study of medicinal products appraisals from 2016 to 2021. A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness of immunoglobulin treatment in patients with hematological malignancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1