在长期难民环境中为青少年实施非专家提供的心理干预:黎巴嫩的定性过程评估

Rayane Ali, Felicity L. Brown, Kerrie Stevenson, Mark Jordans, Karine Taha, Mounif El Amine, Frederik Steen, Bassel Meksassi, Joseph Elias, May Aoun, Bayard Roberts, Marit Sijbrandij, Pim Cuijpers, Aemal Akhtar, Aiysha Malik, Aniek Woodward, Daniela C. Fuhr
{"title":"在长期难民环境中为青少年实施非专家提供的心理干预:黎巴嫩的定性过程评估","authors":"Rayane Ali, Felicity L. Brown, Kerrie Stevenson, Mark Jordans, Karine Taha, Mounif El Amine, Frederik Steen, Bassel Meksassi, Joseph Elias, May Aoun, Bayard Roberts, Marit Sijbrandij, Pim Cuijpers, Aemal Akhtar, Aiysha Malik, Aniek Woodward, Daniela C. Fuhr","doi":"10.1007/s11414-023-09870-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There has been an increase in the evaluation and implementation of non-specialist delivered psychological interventions to address unmet mental health needs in humanitarian emergencies. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide important evidence about intervention impact, complementary qualitative process evaluations are essential to understand key implementation processes and inform future scaling up of the intervention. This study was conducted as part of an RCT of the Early Adolescents Skills for Emotions (EASE) psychological intervention for young adolescents with elevated psychological distress (predominantly with a Syrian refugee background) in Lebanon. Our aims were firstly to conduct a qualitative process evaluation to understand stakeholder experiences and perceived impact of the intervention and identify barriers and facilitators for implementation, and secondly to explore considerations for scaling up. Eleven key informant interviews and seven focus groups were conducted with 39 respondents including adolescent and caregiver participants, trainers, providers, outreach workers, and local stakeholders. Data were analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Respondents perceived the intervention to be highly needed and reported improvements in adolescent mental health and wellbeing. Key implementation factors that have potential to influence engagement, adherence, and perceived impact included the socio-economic situation of families, mental health stigma, coordination within and between sectors (particularly for scaling up), embedding the intervention within existing service pathways, having clear quality and accountability processes including training and supervision for non-specialists, and sustainable funding. Our findings provide important context for understanding effectiveness outcomes of the RCT and highlights factors that need to be considered when implementing a mental health intervention on a larger scale in a complex crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":501693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing a Non-Specialist Delivered Psychological Intervention for Young Adolescents in a Protracted Refugee Setting: a Qualitative Process Evaluation in Lebanon\",\"authors\":\"Rayane Ali, Felicity L. Brown, Kerrie Stevenson, Mark Jordans, Karine Taha, Mounif El Amine, Frederik Steen, Bassel Meksassi, Joseph Elias, May Aoun, Bayard Roberts, Marit Sijbrandij, Pim Cuijpers, Aemal Akhtar, Aiysha Malik, Aniek Woodward, Daniela C. Fuhr\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11414-023-09870-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There has been an increase in the evaluation and implementation of non-specialist delivered psychological interventions to address unmet mental health needs in humanitarian emergencies. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide important evidence about intervention impact, complementary qualitative process evaluations are essential to understand key implementation processes and inform future scaling up of the intervention. This study was conducted as part of an RCT of the Early Adolescents Skills for Emotions (EASE) psychological intervention for young adolescents with elevated psychological distress (predominantly with a Syrian refugee background) in Lebanon. Our aims were firstly to conduct a qualitative process evaluation to understand stakeholder experiences and perceived impact of the intervention and identify barriers and facilitators for implementation, and secondly to explore considerations for scaling up. Eleven key informant interviews and seven focus groups were conducted with 39 respondents including adolescent and caregiver participants, trainers, providers, outreach workers, and local stakeholders. Data were analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Respondents perceived the intervention to be highly needed and reported improvements in adolescent mental health and wellbeing. Key implementation factors that have potential to influence engagement, adherence, and perceived impact included the socio-economic situation of families, mental health stigma, coordination within and between sectors (particularly for scaling up), embedding the intervention within existing service pathways, having clear quality and accountability processes including training and supervision for non-specialists, and sustainable funding. Our findings provide important context for understanding effectiveness outcomes of the RCT and highlights factors that need to be considered when implementing a mental health intervention on a larger scale in a complex crisis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-023-09870-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-023-09870-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对非专业人员提供的心理干预措施的评价和实施有所增加,以解决人道主义紧急情况中未得到满足的心理健康需求。虽然随机对照试验(rct)提供了有关干预影响的重要证据,但补充性定性过程评估对于了解关键实施过程和为未来扩大干预提供信息至关重要。本研究是黎巴嫩早期青少年情绪技能(EASE)心理干预(主要是叙利亚难民背景)的随机对照试验的一部分。我们的目标首先是进行定性的过程评估,以了解利益相关者的经验和干预的感知影响,并确定实施的障碍和促进因素,其次是探索扩大规模的考虑因素。11个关键信息访谈和7个焦点小组对39名受访者进行了调查,其中包括青少年和照顾者参与者、培训师、提供者、外展工作者和当地利益相关者。数据分析采用归纳和演绎主题分析。答复者认为非常需要干预,并报告了青少年心理健康和福祉的改善。有可能影响参与、遵守和感知影响的关键实施因素包括家庭的社会经济状况、心理健康耻辱、部门内部和部门之间的协调(特别是扩大规模)、将干预措施纳入现有服务途径、制定明确的质量和问责程序,包括对非专业人员的培训和监督,以及可持续的供资。我们的发现为理解RCT的有效性结果提供了重要的背景,并强调了在复杂危机中实施更大规模的心理健康干预时需要考虑的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementing a Non-Specialist Delivered Psychological Intervention for Young Adolescents in a Protracted Refugee Setting: a Qualitative Process Evaluation in Lebanon

There has been an increase in the evaluation and implementation of non-specialist delivered psychological interventions to address unmet mental health needs in humanitarian emergencies. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide important evidence about intervention impact, complementary qualitative process evaluations are essential to understand key implementation processes and inform future scaling up of the intervention. This study was conducted as part of an RCT of the Early Adolescents Skills for Emotions (EASE) psychological intervention for young adolescents with elevated psychological distress (predominantly with a Syrian refugee background) in Lebanon. Our aims were firstly to conduct a qualitative process evaluation to understand stakeholder experiences and perceived impact of the intervention and identify barriers and facilitators for implementation, and secondly to explore considerations for scaling up. Eleven key informant interviews and seven focus groups were conducted with 39 respondents including adolescent and caregiver participants, trainers, providers, outreach workers, and local stakeholders. Data were analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Respondents perceived the intervention to be highly needed and reported improvements in adolescent mental health and wellbeing. Key implementation factors that have potential to influence engagement, adherence, and perceived impact included the socio-economic situation of families, mental health stigma, coordination within and between sectors (particularly for scaling up), embedding the intervention within existing service pathways, having clear quality and accountability processes including training and supervision for non-specialists, and sustainable funding. Our findings provide important context for understanding effectiveness outcomes of the RCT and highlights factors that need to be considered when implementing a mental health intervention on a larger scale in a complex crisis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Matching Mobile Crisis Models to Communities: An Example from Northwestern Ontario Patient Satisfaction with Psychological Treatment on a Voluntary Inpatient Psychiatric Unit Assessing Feasibility and Barriers to Implementing a Family-Based Intervention in Opioid Treatment Programs Implementing a Non-Specialist Delivered Psychological Intervention for Young Adolescents in a Protracted Refugee Setting: a Qualitative Process Evaluation in Lebanon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1