在阈值以下精神病患者中实施认知再评估

Jill R. Laquidara, Taylor Johnson, Elyssa M. Barrick, Madeline Ward, Sophia Saavedra, Sarah Hope Lincoln
{"title":"在阈值以下精神病患者中实施认知再评估","authors":"Jill R. Laquidara,&nbsp;Taylor Johnson,&nbsp;Elyssa M. Barrick,&nbsp;Madeline Ward,&nbsp;Sophia Saavedra,&nbsp;Sarah Hope Lincoln","doi":"10.1016/j.jbct.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Cognitive reappraisal<span> is an emotion regulation<span> strategy based in cognitive behavioral therapy and can be associated with positive outcomes for individuals with and at risk for psychosis. However, the literature is mixed regarding whether this population uses cognitive reappraisal effectively. The current study examined</span></span></span> <!-->cognitive reappraisal effectiveness in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis and healthy control participants (<em>N</em> = 66; 34 clinical high risk, 32 healthy controls). The experimental task instructed participants to engage in reappraisal in real-time to regulate distress. We hypothesized that control participants would be more effective at using cognitive reappraisal compared to psychosis-risk participants, resulting in greater distress reduction post-reappraisal. Results demonstrated the opposite: the psychosis-risk group reported a greater change in distress level than the healthy control group after reappraisal was employed (Cohen’s <em>d</em><span> = 0.52). Exploratory analyses revealed that the clinical high risk group reported higher pre-task distress, but reported post-reappraisal distress levels equivalent to the healthy control group. These results contribute to emerging evidence that suggests individuals on the psychosis spectrum can implement reappraisal effectively. Therefore, complex training to improve cognitive reappraisal may not be needed. Instead, future research should examine the potential clinical utility of using simple reminders and/or guided prompts to promote cognitive reappraisal in individuals on the psychosis spectrum.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":36022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 207-215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of cognitive reappraisal in subthreshold psychosis\",\"authors\":\"Jill R. Laquidara,&nbsp;Taylor Johnson,&nbsp;Elyssa M. Barrick,&nbsp;Madeline Ward,&nbsp;Sophia Saavedra,&nbsp;Sarah Hope Lincoln\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbct.2023.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Cognitive reappraisal<span> is an emotion regulation<span> strategy based in cognitive behavioral therapy and can be associated with positive outcomes for individuals with and at risk for psychosis. However, the literature is mixed regarding whether this population uses cognitive reappraisal effectively. The current study examined</span></span></span> <!-->cognitive reappraisal effectiveness in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis and healthy control participants (<em>N</em> = 66; 34 clinical high risk, 32 healthy controls). The experimental task instructed participants to engage in reappraisal in real-time to regulate distress. We hypothesized that control participants would be more effective at using cognitive reappraisal compared to psychosis-risk participants, resulting in greater distress reduction post-reappraisal. Results demonstrated the opposite: the psychosis-risk group reported a greater change in distress level than the healthy control group after reappraisal was employed (Cohen’s <em>d</em><span> = 0.52). Exploratory analyses revealed that the clinical high risk group reported higher pre-task distress, but reported post-reappraisal distress levels equivalent to the healthy control group. These results contribute to emerging evidence that suggests individuals on the psychosis spectrum can implement reappraisal effectively. Therefore, complex training to improve cognitive reappraisal may not be needed. Instead, future research should examine the potential clinical utility of using simple reminders and/or guided prompts to promote cognitive reappraisal in individuals on the psychosis spectrum.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 207-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979123000264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589979123000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知重评是一种基于认知行为疗法的情绪调节策略,对精神病患者和有精神病风险的个体具有积极的影响。然而,关于这一人群是否有效地使用认知重新评估,文献是混杂的。本研究考察了临床精神病高危个体和健康对照者的认知再评估效果(N = 66;临床高危人群34例,健康对照32例)。实验任务指示参与者进行实时重新评估以调节痛苦。我们假设,与精神病风险参与者相比,对照组参与者在使用认知重新评估方面更有效,从而在重新评估后减少更多的痛苦。结果显示相反:精神病风险组在重新评估后报告的痛苦水平变化大于健康对照组(Cohen’s d = 0.52)。探索性分析显示,临床高风险组报告了更高的任务前痛苦,但报告的重新评估后的痛苦水平与健康对照组相当。这些结果提供了新的证据,表明精神病谱系上的个体可以有效地实施重新评估。因此,可能不需要复杂的训练来提高认知再评估。相反,未来的研究应该检查使用简单的提醒和/或引导提示来促进精神病患者认知重新评估的潜在临床效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of cognitive reappraisal in subthreshold psychosis

Cognitive reappraisal is an emotion regulation strategy based in cognitive behavioral therapy and can be associated with positive outcomes for individuals with and at risk for psychosis. However, the literature is mixed regarding whether this population uses cognitive reappraisal effectively. The current study examined cognitive reappraisal effectiveness in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis and healthy control participants (N = 66; 34 clinical high risk, 32 healthy controls). The experimental task instructed participants to engage in reappraisal in real-time to regulate distress. We hypothesized that control participants would be more effective at using cognitive reappraisal compared to psychosis-risk participants, resulting in greater distress reduction post-reappraisal. Results demonstrated the opposite: the psychosis-risk group reported a greater change in distress level than the healthy control group after reappraisal was employed (Cohen’s d = 0.52). Exploratory analyses revealed that the clinical high risk group reported higher pre-task distress, but reported post-reappraisal distress levels equivalent to the healthy control group. These results contribute to emerging evidence that suggests individuals on the psychosis spectrum can implement reappraisal effectively. Therefore, complex training to improve cognitive reappraisal may not be needed. Instead, future research should examine the potential clinical utility of using simple reminders and/or guided prompts to promote cognitive reappraisal in individuals on the psychosis spectrum.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents ACKNOWLEDGING OUR 2024 REVIEWERS The Benzodiazepine Dependence Questionnaire (BDEPQ): Development of a brief version and validation of a French adaptation Efficacy of online mental health education on occupational burnout among medical staff
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1