OP152 巴西卫生技术评估委员会(Conitec)利用现实世界的证据监测卫生技术

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1017/s0266462323001514
Amanda Oliveira Lyrio, Tacila Pires Mega, Ana Carolina de Freitas Lopes, Felipe Ferré, Antônio Marcos Santana Barreira, Clarice Moreira Portugal, Samara Helena de Carvalho, Laís Lessa Neiva Pantuzza, Luciene Fontes Schluckebier Bonan, Vania Cristina Canuto Santos
{"title":"OP152 巴西卫生技术评估委员会(Conitec)利用现实世界的证据监测卫生技术","authors":"Amanda Oliveira Lyrio, Tacila Pires Mega, Ana Carolina de Freitas Lopes, Felipe Ferré, Antônio Marcos Santana Barreira, Clarice Moreira Portugal, Samara Helena de Carvalho, Laís Lessa Neiva Pantuzza, Luciene Fontes Schluckebier Bonan, Vania Cristina Canuto Santos","doi":"10.1017/s0266462323001514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionIn Brazil, the incorporation or disinvestment of health technologies into the Unified Health System (SUS) are advised by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (Conitec). Despite the thorough evaluation carried out by Conitec, the results measured after implementation do not always reflect the economic and clinical impact expected from the incorporation. Thus, real-world evidence (RWE) is essential for monitoring health technologies. The aim of this study was to report how Brazil is using the RWE to obtain additional information about the incorporated technologies.MethodsActions related to the use of RWE for monitoring of technologies incorporated into the SUS were described. The period evaluated was between 2012 and 2022.ResultsThe first Conitec recommendation in which the use of real-life data in the decision-making process was evidenced occurred in 2016. Administrative data from a cohort of patients identified that beta-interferons for Multiple Sclerosis were less effective than the other drugs used in the Brazilian public system. A further eight reports have been published assessing the performance of technologies using administrative data.Another strategy for RWE generation was through the funding of primary studies, highlighting a study with 21 rare diseases and another one to evaluate Zolgensma gene therapy, acquired through court for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Both studies are ongoing and aim to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, adherence, and cost of medications in the evaluated diseases. Conitec is also following studies in RWE financed by pharmaceutical companies to evaluate effectiveness for incorporated technologies subject to reassessment. Additionally, managed access arrangements have been promoted for generating RWE when there is uncertainty about outcomes.ConclusionsReal-world evidence from administrative data and clinical research allows monitoring after the implementation of technologies in the Unified Health System in Brazil. This makes it possible to reallocate resources in health and contribute for the system sustainability, in addition to generating data that reduce the uncertainties assumed at the time of incorporation.","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OP152 Use of Real-world Evidence By The Brazilian Health Technology Assessment Committee (Conitec) For Monitoring Of Health Technologies\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Oliveira Lyrio, Tacila Pires Mega, Ana Carolina de Freitas Lopes, Felipe Ferré, Antônio Marcos Santana Barreira, Clarice Moreira Portugal, Samara Helena de Carvalho, Laís Lessa Neiva Pantuzza, Luciene Fontes Schluckebier Bonan, Vania Cristina Canuto Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0266462323001514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionIn Brazil, the incorporation or disinvestment of health technologies into the Unified Health System (SUS) are advised by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (Conitec). Despite the thorough evaluation carried out by Conitec, the results measured after implementation do not always reflect the economic and clinical impact expected from the incorporation. Thus, real-world evidence (RWE) is essential for monitoring health technologies. The aim of this study was to report how Brazil is using the RWE to obtain additional information about the incorporated technologies.MethodsActions related to the use of RWE for monitoring of technologies incorporated into the SUS were described. The period evaluated was between 2012 and 2022.ResultsThe first Conitec recommendation in which the use of real-life data in the decision-making process was evidenced occurred in 2016. Administrative data from a cohort of patients identified that beta-interferons for Multiple Sclerosis were less effective than the other drugs used in the Brazilian public system. A further eight reports have been published assessing the performance of technologies using administrative data.Another strategy for RWE generation was through the funding of primary studies, highlighting a study with 21 rare diseases and another one to evaluate Zolgensma gene therapy, acquired through court for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Both studies are ongoing and aim to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, adherence, and cost of medications in the evaluated diseases. Conitec is also following studies in RWE financed by pharmaceutical companies to evaluate effectiveness for incorporated technologies subject to reassessment. Additionally, managed access arrangements have been promoted for generating RWE when there is uncertainty about outcomes.ConclusionsReal-world evidence from administrative data and clinical research allows monitoring after the implementation of technologies in the Unified Health System in Brazil. This makes it possible to reallocate resources in health and contribute for the system sustainability, in addition to generating data that reduce the uncertainties assumed at the time of incorporation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323001514\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323001514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言在巴西,国家卫生技术纳入委员会(Conitec)负责建议将卫生技术纳入或取消对统一卫生系统(SUS)的投资。尽管 Conitec 进行了全面评估,但实施后测量的结果并不总能反映纳入后预期产生的经济和临床影响。因此,真实世界证据(RWE)对于监测医疗技术至关重要。本研究的目的是报告巴西是如何利用 RWE 来获取有关纳入技术的更多信息的。方法介绍了利用 RWE 对纳入统一卫生系统的技术进行监测的相关行动。评估期间为 2012 年至 2022 年。结果在决策过程中使用真实生活数据的首个 Conitec 建议发生在 2016 年。一组患者的管理数据显示,在巴西公共系统中,β-干扰素治疗多发性硬化症的效果不如其他药物。另一项产生 RWE 的战略是资助初级研究,其中一项研究涉及 21 种罕见疾病,另一项研究则是评估通过法院获得的用于脊髓性肌肉萎缩症的 Zolgensma 基因疗法。这两项研究都在进行中,旨在评估所评估疾病的有效性、安全性、依从性和药物成本。康尼泰克公司还在跟踪由制药公司资助的 RWE 研究,以评估纳入重新评估的技术的有效性。此外,在结果不确定的情况下,还推广了有管理的准入安排,以产生 RWE。这使得有可能重新分配卫生资源,促进系统的可持续发展,此外还能生成数据,减少纳入时假定的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OP152 Use of Real-world Evidence By The Brazilian Health Technology Assessment Committee (Conitec) For Monitoring Of Health Technologies
IntroductionIn Brazil, the incorporation or disinvestment of health technologies into the Unified Health System (SUS) are advised by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (Conitec). Despite the thorough evaluation carried out by Conitec, the results measured after implementation do not always reflect the economic and clinical impact expected from the incorporation. Thus, real-world evidence (RWE) is essential for monitoring health technologies. The aim of this study was to report how Brazil is using the RWE to obtain additional information about the incorporated technologies.MethodsActions related to the use of RWE for monitoring of technologies incorporated into the SUS were described. The period evaluated was between 2012 and 2022.ResultsThe first Conitec recommendation in which the use of real-life data in the decision-making process was evidenced occurred in 2016. Administrative data from a cohort of patients identified that beta-interferons for Multiple Sclerosis were less effective than the other drugs used in the Brazilian public system. A further eight reports have been published assessing the performance of technologies using administrative data.Another strategy for RWE generation was through the funding of primary studies, highlighting a study with 21 rare diseases and another one to evaluate Zolgensma gene therapy, acquired through court for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Both studies are ongoing and aim to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, adherence, and cost of medications in the evaluated diseases. Conitec is also following studies in RWE financed by pharmaceutical companies to evaluate effectiveness for incorporated technologies subject to reassessment. Additionally, managed access arrangements have been promoted for generating RWE when there is uncertainty about outcomes.ConclusionsReal-world evidence from administrative data and clinical research allows monitoring after the implementation of technologies in the Unified Health System in Brazil. This makes it possible to reallocate resources in health and contribute for the system sustainability, in addition to generating data that reduce the uncertainties assumed at the time of incorporation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
期刊最新文献
Development of an MCDA Framework for Rare Disease Reimbursement Prioritization in Malaysia. Experiences of patient organizations' involvement in medicine appraisal and reimbursement processes in Finland - a qualitative study. PP78 Real-World Trends And Medical Costs Of Stroke After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation In Korea: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study Can requests for real-world evidence by the French HTA body be planned? An exhaustive retrospective case-control study of medicinal products appraisals from 2016 to 2021. A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness of immunoglobulin treatment in patients with hematological malignancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1