青少年和青年抑郁症患者的治疗偏好:离散选择实验

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Pub Date : 2023-12-18 DOI:10.1007/s40258-023-00857-x
Ruth C. Waumans, Anna D. T. Muntingh, Jorien Veldwijk, Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn, Anton J. L. M. van Balkom, Neeltje M. Batelaan
{"title":"青少年和青年抑郁症患者的治疗偏好:离散选择实验","authors":"Ruth C. Waumans,&nbsp;Anna D. T. Muntingh,&nbsp;Jorien Veldwijk,&nbsp;Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn,&nbsp;Anton J. L. M. van Balkom,&nbsp;Neeltje M. Batelaan","doi":"10.1007/s40258-023-00857-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Depression in adolescents and young adults is common and causes considerable disease burden while hampering their development, leading to adverse consequences in later life. Although treatment is available, young people are a vulnerable group regarding uptake and completion of treatment. To improve this, insight into youth’s preferences for treatment is essential.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate patient preferences for depression treatment in a Dutch sample aged 16–24 years using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was conducted in The Netherlands between October 2018 and June 2019, and included 236 adolescents and young adults with current depressive symptoms or previous treatment. The DCE included five attributes (treatment type, frequency of appointment, waiting time, effectiveness, evaluation of therapeutic alliance) with corresponding levels. Results were analysed using latent class analysis.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Results show a general preference for individual psychotherapy, treatment with high frequency, high effectiveness, short waiting time and a standard evaluation of the therapeutic alliance (‘click’ with the therapist) early in treatment. Latent class analysis revealed three different patterns of preferences regarding treatment type and willingness to engage in therapy. The first class showed a strong preference for individual therapy. The second class, including relatively older, higher educated and treatment-experienced participants, preferred high frequency treatment and was more open to different forms of therapy. The third class, including lower educated, younger and treatment-naïve adolescents showed reluctance to engage in therapy overall and in group therapy specifically.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this DCE, three classes could be identified that share similar preferences regarding treatment effectiveness, waiting time and evaluation of the therapeutic alliance, but varied considerably in their preference for treatment type (individual, group, or combined psychotherapy) and their willingness to engage. The results from this study may inform mental health care providers and institutions and help optimize professional care for adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms, improving engagement in this vulnerable group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":"22 3","pages":"401 - 413"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Preferences of Adolescents and Young Adults with Depressive Symptoms: A Discrete Choice Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Ruth C. Waumans,&nbsp;Anna D. T. Muntingh,&nbsp;Jorien Veldwijk,&nbsp;Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn,&nbsp;Anton J. L. M. van Balkom,&nbsp;Neeltje M. Batelaan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40258-023-00857-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Depression in adolescents and young adults is common and causes considerable disease burden while hampering their development, leading to adverse consequences in later life. Although treatment is available, young people are a vulnerable group regarding uptake and completion of treatment. To improve this, insight into youth’s preferences for treatment is essential.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate patient preferences for depression treatment in a Dutch sample aged 16–24 years using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was conducted in The Netherlands between October 2018 and June 2019, and included 236 adolescents and young adults with current depressive symptoms or previous treatment. The DCE included five attributes (treatment type, frequency of appointment, waiting time, effectiveness, evaluation of therapeutic alliance) with corresponding levels. Results were analysed using latent class analysis.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Results show a general preference for individual psychotherapy, treatment with high frequency, high effectiveness, short waiting time and a standard evaluation of the therapeutic alliance (‘click’ with the therapist) early in treatment. Latent class analysis revealed three different patterns of preferences regarding treatment type and willingness to engage in therapy. The first class showed a strong preference for individual therapy. The second class, including relatively older, higher educated and treatment-experienced participants, preferred high frequency treatment and was more open to different forms of therapy. The third class, including lower educated, younger and treatment-naïve adolescents showed reluctance to engage in therapy overall and in group therapy specifically.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this DCE, three classes could be identified that share similar preferences regarding treatment effectiveness, waiting time and evaluation of the therapeutic alliance, but varied considerably in their preference for treatment type (individual, group, or combined psychotherapy) and their willingness to engage. The results from this study may inform mental health care providers and institutions and help optimize professional care for adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms, improving engagement in this vulnerable group.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"401 - 413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40258-023-00857-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40258-023-00857-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景青少年和年轻人抑郁症很常见,会造成相当大的疾病负担,同时阻碍他们的发展,给以后的生活带来不良后果。虽然有治疗方法,但青少年在接受治疗和完成治疗方面是一个弱势群体。为了改善这一状况,深入了解青少年对治疗的偏好至关重要。本研究旨在使用离散选择实验(DCE)调查荷兰 16-24 岁样本中患者对抑郁症治疗的偏好。方法本研究于 2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 6 月在荷兰进行,共纳入 236 名目前有抑郁症状或曾接受过治疗的青少年。DCE包括五个属性(治疗类型、预约频率、等待时间、疗效、治疗联盟评估)和相应的水平。结果显示,患者普遍倾向于个人心理治疗,治疗频率高、疗效好、等待时间短,并在治疗初期对治疗联盟进行标准评估(与治疗师的 "点击")。潜类分析显示,在治疗类型和参与治疗的意愿方面,有三种不同的偏好模式。第一类患者强烈倾向于个人治疗。第二类包括年龄相对较大、受教育程度较高和治疗经验丰富的参与者,他们更喜欢高频率的治疗,并对不同形式的治疗持更开放的态度。结论 在这项心理健康教育研究中,我们可以发现三个群体在治疗效果、等待时间和对治疗联盟的评估方面有着相似的偏好,但在对治疗类型(个人治疗、团体治疗或综合心理治疗)的偏好以及参与意愿方面却存在很大差异。这项研究的结果可以为心理健康服务提供者和机构提供参考,有助于优化对有抑郁症状的青少年和年轻人的专业治疗,提高这一弱势群体的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment Preferences of Adolescents and Young Adults with Depressive Symptoms: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Background

Depression in adolescents and young adults is common and causes considerable disease burden while hampering their development, leading to adverse consequences in later life. Although treatment is available, young people are a vulnerable group regarding uptake and completion of treatment. To improve this, insight into youth’s preferences for treatment is essential.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate patient preferences for depression treatment in a Dutch sample aged 16–24 years using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).

Methods

The study was conducted in The Netherlands between October 2018 and June 2019, and included 236 adolescents and young adults with current depressive symptoms or previous treatment. The DCE included five attributes (treatment type, frequency of appointment, waiting time, effectiveness, evaluation of therapeutic alliance) with corresponding levels. Results were analysed using latent class analysis.

Results

Results show a general preference for individual psychotherapy, treatment with high frequency, high effectiveness, short waiting time and a standard evaluation of the therapeutic alliance (‘click’ with the therapist) early in treatment. Latent class analysis revealed three different patterns of preferences regarding treatment type and willingness to engage in therapy. The first class showed a strong preference for individual therapy. The second class, including relatively older, higher educated and treatment-experienced participants, preferred high frequency treatment and was more open to different forms of therapy. The third class, including lower educated, younger and treatment-naïve adolescents showed reluctance to engage in therapy overall and in group therapy specifically.

Conclusion

In this DCE, three classes could be identified that share similar preferences regarding treatment effectiveness, waiting time and evaluation of the therapeutic alliance, but varied considerably in their preference for treatment type (individual, group, or combined psychotherapy) and their willingness to engage. The results from this study may inform mental health care providers and institutions and help optimize professional care for adolescents and young adults with depressive symptoms, improving engagement in this vulnerable group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effective and Sustainable Drug Use in Hospitals: A Systematic and Practice-Based Approach. Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy Norms Based on the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 for China. Value is Gendered: The Need for Sex and Gender Considerations in Health Economic Evaluations. Assessing the Direct Impact of Death on Discrete Choice Experiment Utilities. Acknowledgement to Referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1