切片检验--从订购到报告的注意事项:分子病理学协会、美国病理学家学会和全国遗传咨询师协会联合报告

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Journal of Molecular Diagnostics Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.11.008
Jeffrey A. SoRelle , Birgit H. Funke , Celeste C. Eno , Jianling Ji , Avni Santani , Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir , Megan Wachsmann , Karen E. Wain , Rong Mao
{"title":"切片检验--从订购到报告的注意事项:分子病理学协会、美国病理学家学会和全国遗传咨询师协会联合报告","authors":"Jeffrey A. SoRelle ,&nbsp;Birgit H. Funke ,&nbsp;Celeste C. Eno ,&nbsp;Jianling Ji ,&nbsp;Avni Santani ,&nbsp;Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir ,&nbsp;Megan Wachsmann ,&nbsp;Karen E. Wain ,&nbsp;Rong Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As the number of genes associated with various germline disorders continues to grow, it is becoming more difficult for clinical laboratories to maintain separate assays for interrogating disease-focused gene panels. One solution to this challenge is termed slice testing, where capture backbone is used to analyze data specific to a set of genes, and for this article, we will focus on exome. A key advantage to this strategy is greater flexibility by adding genes as they become associated with disease or the ability to accommodate specific provider requests. Here, we provide expert consensus recommendations and results from an Association for Molecular Pathology–sponsored survey of clinical laboratories performing exome sequencing to compare a slice testing approach with traditional static gene panels and comprehensive exome analysis. We explore specific considerations for slices, including gene selection, analytic performance, coverage, quality, and interpretation. Our goal is to provide comprehensive guidance for clinical laboratories interested in designing and using slice tests as a diagnostic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157823002933/pdfft?md5=77cd55be79b3b8d5d5f3748b49b642f4&pid=1-s2.0-S1525157823002933-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slice Testing—Considerations from Ordering to Reporting\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey A. SoRelle ,&nbsp;Birgit H. Funke ,&nbsp;Celeste C. Eno ,&nbsp;Jianling Ji ,&nbsp;Avni Santani ,&nbsp;Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir ,&nbsp;Megan Wachsmann ,&nbsp;Karen E. Wain ,&nbsp;Rong Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.11.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As the number of genes associated with various germline disorders continues to grow, it is becoming more difficult for clinical laboratories to maintain separate assays for interrogating disease-focused gene panels. One solution to this challenge is termed slice testing, where capture backbone is used to analyze data specific to a set of genes, and for this article, we will focus on exome. A key advantage to this strategy is greater flexibility by adding genes as they become associated with disease or the ability to accommodate specific provider requests. Here, we provide expert consensus recommendations and results from an Association for Molecular Pathology–sponsored survey of clinical laboratories performing exome sequencing to compare a slice testing approach with traditional static gene panels and comprehensive exome analysis. We explore specific considerations for slices, including gene selection, analytic performance, coverage, quality, and interpretation. Our goal is to provide comprehensive guidance for clinical laboratories interested in designing and using slice tests as a diagnostic.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157823002933/pdfft?md5=77cd55be79b3b8d5d5f3748b49b642f4&pid=1-s2.0-S1525157823002933-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157823002933\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157823002933","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着与各种生殖系统疾病相关的基因数量不断增加,临床实验室越来越难以维持单独的检测方法来分析疾病相关基因。解决这一难题的方法之一是切片检测,即利用捕获骨架分析一组基因的特定数据,本文将重点讨论外显子组。这种策略的一个主要优势是灵活性更大,可以在基因与疾病相关时添加基因,也可以满足特定供应商的要求。在此,我们将提供专家共识建议,以及由分子病理学协会发起的对进行外显子组测序的临床实验室进行调查的结果,以比较切片检测方法与传统的静态基因组和综合外显子组分析。我们探讨了切片检测的具体注意事项,包括基因选择、分析性能、覆盖范围、质量和解释。我们的目标是为有意设计和利用切片检验作为诊断手段的临床实验室提供全面的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Slice Testing—Considerations from Ordering to Reporting

As the number of genes associated with various germline disorders continues to grow, it is becoming more difficult for clinical laboratories to maintain separate assays for interrogating disease-focused gene panels. One solution to this challenge is termed slice testing, where capture backbone is used to analyze data specific to a set of genes, and for this article, we will focus on exome. A key advantage to this strategy is greater flexibility by adding genes as they become associated with disease or the ability to accommodate specific provider requests. Here, we provide expert consensus recommendations and results from an Association for Molecular Pathology–sponsored survey of clinical laboratories performing exome sequencing to compare a slice testing approach with traditional static gene panels and comprehensive exome analysis. We explore specific considerations for slices, including gene selection, analytic performance, coverage, quality, and interpretation. Our goal is to provide comprehensive guidance for clinical laboratories interested in designing and using slice tests as a diagnostic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
143
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents 25 Years of Publishing The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics Navigating the Flood The Era of Molecular Hematopathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1