研究健康科学专业学生对复杂思维能力的认知水平及其与毕业生情况的相关性

Paloma Suárez-Brito , José Carlos Vázquez-Parra , Edgar Omar López-Caudana , Mariana Buenestado-Fernandez
{"title":"研究健康科学专业学生对复杂思维能力的认知水平及其与毕业生情况的相关性","authors":"Paloma Suárez-Brito ,&nbsp;José Carlos Vázquez-Parra ,&nbsp;Edgar Omar López-Caudana ,&nbsp;Mariana Buenestado-Fernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents the findings of a study conducted on health sciences students in their last semester of training regarding their perceived achievement of the complex thinking competency and its sub-competencies. The objective was to gain insight into how these students perceive the cognitive competencies and skills acquired during their university career as relevant to meet the challenges of their future professions. This study contrasts the perception of achievement of complex thinking competence by gender of the participants, as well as compared to students from other disciplines, with the intention of identifying significant differences. This competency's selection lies in its relevance to decision-making when facing problems, which is fundamental for any contemporary professional. This study relied on a representative convenience sample of graduating candidates from a university in western Mexico. Methodologically, the researchers used descriptive analyses and a validated instrument. The results indicated that the sample students' perceived achievement was very high and balanced, i.e., no significant differences existed by gender or the perception of their sub-competencies. This study revealed a significant difference compared to other disciplinary areas; the medical and health sciences graduate candidates' perceived achievement of competency development was higher.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374023000894/pdfft?md5=045273a8da5ff42a41b24f39fe00e0a7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666374023000894-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the level of perceived achievement of complex thinking competency in health sciences students and its relevance to the graduate profile\",\"authors\":\"Paloma Suárez-Brito ,&nbsp;José Carlos Vázquez-Parra ,&nbsp;Edgar Omar López-Caudana ,&nbsp;Mariana Buenestado-Fernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article presents the findings of a study conducted on health sciences students in their last semester of training regarding their perceived achievement of the complex thinking competency and its sub-competencies. The objective was to gain insight into how these students perceive the cognitive competencies and skills acquired during their university career as relevant to meet the challenges of their future professions. This study contrasts the perception of achievement of complex thinking competence by gender of the participants, as well as compared to students from other disciplines, with the intention of identifying significant differences. This competency's selection lies in its relevance to decision-making when facing problems, which is fundamental for any contemporary professional. This study relied on a representative convenience sample of graduating candidates from a university in western Mexico. Methodologically, the researchers used descriptive analyses and a validated instrument. The results indicated that the sample students' perceived achievement was very high and balanced, i.e., no significant differences existed by gender or the perception of their sub-competencies. This study revealed a significant difference compared to other disciplinary areas; the medical and health sciences graduate candidates' perceived achievement of competency development was higher.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374023000894/pdfft?md5=045273a8da5ff42a41b24f39fe00e0a7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666374023000894-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374023000894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374023000894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一项针对健康科学专业学生的研究结果,研究对象是他们在最后一个学期的培训中对复杂思维能力及其子能力的认知成就。目的是深入了解这些学生如何看待他们在大学期间获得的认知能力和技能与应对未来职业挑战的相关性。本研究对比了不同性别学生对复杂思维能力成就的看法,并与其他学科的学生进行了比较,旨在找出显著差异。这种能力的选择在于它与面对问题时的决策相关,这对任何当代专业人员来说都是至关重要的。本研究以墨西哥西部一所大学即将毕业的学生为样本,具有一定的代表性。在方法上,研究人员使用了描述性分析和一个经过验证的工具。结果表明,样本学生的认知成就非常高且均衡,即不同性别或对其子能力的认知不存在显著差异。这项研究显示,与其他学科领域相比,医学和健康科学专业的研究生在能力发展方面的认知成就较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the level of perceived achievement of complex thinking competency in health sciences students and its relevance to the graduate profile

This article presents the findings of a study conducted on health sciences students in their last semester of training regarding their perceived achievement of the complex thinking competency and its sub-competencies. The objective was to gain insight into how these students perceive the cognitive competencies and skills acquired during their university career as relevant to meet the challenges of their future professions. This study contrasts the perception of achievement of complex thinking competence by gender of the participants, as well as compared to students from other disciplines, with the intention of identifying significant differences. This competency's selection lies in its relevance to decision-making when facing problems, which is fundamental for any contemporary professional. This study relied on a representative convenience sample of graduating candidates from a university in western Mexico. Methodologically, the researchers used descriptive analyses and a validated instrument. The results indicated that the sample students' perceived achievement was very high and balanced, i.e., no significant differences existed by gender or the perception of their sub-competencies. This study revealed a significant difference compared to other disciplinary areas; the medical and health sciences graduate candidates' perceived achievement of competency development was higher.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Navigating the virtual landscape: A systematic review of approaches to cultivating a sense of community among distance learners in health and allied health disciplines Approaching a substantive theory of moral reckoning in special education leadership: Innovative grounded theory methods using extant data on principals An assessment of the Education Management Information System in Sierra Leone and potential for enhanced disability inclusiveness AI chatbots: A disguised enemy for academic integrity? The role of students’ perceived teacher support in student motivation: A longitudinal study of student motivation profiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1