心理健康专业实习生对新开发的以同情为重点的简短干预的体验--定性研究

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY SSM. Mental health Pub Date : 2023-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100288
Ella Janes , Chloe Gibbons , Silan Gyane , Chris Irons , Michelle Wilson
{"title":"心理健康专业实习生对新开发的以同情为重点的简短干预的体验--定性研究","authors":"Ella Janes ,&nbsp;Chloe Gibbons ,&nbsp;Silan Gyane ,&nbsp;Chris Irons ,&nbsp;Michelle Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Informed by the Medical Research Council's process evaluation framework (Moore et al., 2015), this study explored the experiences of a newly developed brief compassion-focused intervention for trainee mental health professionals (tMHPs).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A qualitative approach was taken, using semi-structured interviews analysed with thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke, 2006).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The intervention was developed and planned in collaboration with key stakeholders. The intervention was piloted by delivering it to tMHPs at course centres in England as part of their core teaching programme. Qualitative methods were employed to explore the experiences of the intervention using in-depth semi-structured interviews (n = 19).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Whilst several suggested improvements were recommended by participants, the experience of the intervention was generally good. Participants reported finding the intervention helpful and described positive changes they subsequently noticed in themselves and their work. Factors facilitating engagement with and implementation of the intervention, such as interactive and experiential content, were discussed as improving experience. Conversely, contextual factors, such as multiple demands and levels of support, were most consistently spoken about as preventing participants from being able to make use of the intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The brief compassion-focused intervention was largely perceived to be helpful and valuable. However, some aspects of the intervention and the context in which it was delivered were discussed as creating barriers to engagement and implementation, thereby impacting experience. These findings have several clinical implications and highlight areas for further research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560323001032/pdfft?md5=eed2516d997395ccfa7e1703d1e29721&pid=1-s2.0-S2666560323001032-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of a newly developed brief compassion-focused intervention for Trainee mental health professionals – A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Ella Janes ,&nbsp;Chloe Gibbons ,&nbsp;Silan Gyane ,&nbsp;Chris Irons ,&nbsp;Michelle Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Informed by the Medical Research Council's process evaluation framework (Moore et al., 2015), this study explored the experiences of a newly developed brief compassion-focused intervention for trainee mental health professionals (tMHPs).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A qualitative approach was taken, using semi-structured interviews analysed with thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke, 2006).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The intervention was developed and planned in collaboration with key stakeholders. The intervention was piloted by delivering it to tMHPs at course centres in England as part of their core teaching programme. Qualitative methods were employed to explore the experiences of the intervention using in-depth semi-structured interviews (n = 19).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Whilst several suggested improvements were recommended by participants, the experience of the intervention was generally good. Participants reported finding the intervention helpful and described positive changes they subsequently noticed in themselves and their work. Factors facilitating engagement with and implementation of the intervention, such as interactive and experiential content, were discussed as improving experience. Conversely, contextual factors, such as multiple demands and levels of support, were most consistently spoken about as preventing participants from being able to make use of the intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The brief compassion-focused intervention was largely perceived to be helpful and valuable. However, some aspects of the intervention and the context in which it was delivered were discussed as creating barriers to engagement and implementation, thereby impacting experience. These findings have several clinical implications and highlight areas for further research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560323001032/pdfft?md5=eed2516d997395ccfa7e1703d1e29721&pid=1-s2.0-S2666560323001032-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560323001032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560323001032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以医学研究委员会的过程评估框架(Moore 等人,2015 年)为依据,探讨了针对实习心理健康专业人员(tMHPs)新开发的以同情为重点的简短干预措施的经验。方法干预措施是与主要利益相关者合作开发和规划的。作为核心教学计划的一部分,在英格兰的课程中心对 tMHP 进行了干预试点。采用定性方法,通过深入的半结构式访谈(n = 19)来探讨干预的经验。结果虽然参与者提出了一些改进建议,但干预的经验总体上是好的。参与者认为干预措施很有帮助,并描述了他们随后在自身和工作中注意到的积极变化。促进参与和实施干预的因素,如互动和体验式内容,被认为是改善体验的因素。与此相反,参与者最常谈论的是阻碍他们利用干预措施的背景因素,如多种需求和支持水平。然而,干预的某些方面以及实施干预的环境被认为会对参与者的参与和实施造成障碍,从而影响体验。这些发现具有一些临床意义,并强调了需要进一步研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiences of a newly developed brief compassion-focused intervention for Trainee mental health professionals – A qualitative study

Objectives

Informed by the Medical Research Council's process evaluation framework (Moore et al., 2015), this study explored the experiences of a newly developed brief compassion-focused intervention for trainee mental health professionals (tMHPs).

Design

A qualitative approach was taken, using semi-structured interviews analysed with thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke, 2006).

Method

The intervention was developed and planned in collaboration with key stakeholders. The intervention was piloted by delivering it to tMHPs at course centres in England as part of their core teaching programme. Qualitative methods were employed to explore the experiences of the intervention using in-depth semi-structured interviews (n = 19).

Results

Whilst several suggested improvements were recommended by participants, the experience of the intervention was generally good. Participants reported finding the intervention helpful and described positive changes they subsequently noticed in themselves and their work. Factors facilitating engagement with and implementation of the intervention, such as interactive and experiential content, were discussed as improving experience. Conversely, contextual factors, such as multiple demands and levels of support, were most consistently spoken about as preventing participants from being able to make use of the intervention.

Conclusions

The brief compassion-focused intervention was largely perceived to be helpful and valuable. However, some aspects of the intervention and the context in which it was delivered were discussed as creating barriers to engagement and implementation, thereby impacting experience. These findings have several clinical implications and highlight areas for further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
期刊最新文献
State-level variation in the prevalence of child psychopathology symptoms in the US: Results from the ABCD study Perceptions around occupational mental well-being of community health workers and an intervention package for its promotion: A mixed-methods study in rural Chiapas, Mexico The ties that bind: Understanding the mental health consequences of the Windrush Scandal and hostile immigration policies on survivors in the UK Barriers and enablers to a coordinated MHPSS response in Lebanon: A case study of the MHPSS Taskforce Understanding depression and the PHQ-9 items among people living with HIV: A multiple methods qualitative study in Yaoundé, Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1