DLBCL 的二线治疗:选择的演变

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Seminars in hematology Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2023.12.001
N. Fabbri, A. Mussetti, A. Sureda
{"title":"DLBCL 的二线治疗:选择的演变","authors":"N. Fabbri, A. Mussetti, A. Sureda","doi":"10.1053/j.seminhematol.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the era of immunochemotherapy, approximately 60%–70% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients achieve remission with first-line rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy. However, 30-40% relapse after initial response to first line therapy and, out of them, 20% to 50% are refractory or experience early relapse. The second-line therapy algorithm for DLBCL has recently evolved, thanks to the recent approval of new therapeutic agents or their combinations. The new guidelines suggest a stratification of relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL based on the time to relapse. For transplant-eligible patients, autologous stem cell transplant remains the preferred option when the patient relapses after 12 months from diagnosis, while anti-CD19 CART-cell therapy is the current preferred choice for high-risk DLBCL, defined as primary refractory or relapse ≤ 12 month. For transplant-ineligible or CAR T-cell therapy-ineligible patients, the therapeutic arsenal historically lacked effective options. However, new therapeutic options, including polatuzumab vedotin combined with bendamustine-rituximab and tafasitamab with lenalidomide, have been recently approved, and novel agents such as loncastuximab tesirine, selinexor, anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies have shown promising efficacy and manageable safety in this setting offering new hope to patients in this challenging scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":21684,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second Line Treatment of DLBCL: Evolution of Options\",\"authors\":\"N. Fabbri, A. Mussetti, A. Sureda\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.seminhematol.2023.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the era of immunochemotherapy, approximately 60%–70% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients achieve remission with first-line rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy. However, 30-40% relapse after initial response to first line therapy and, out of them, 20% to 50% are refractory or experience early relapse. The second-line therapy algorithm for DLBCL has recently evolved, thanks to the recent approval of new therapeutic agents or their combinations. The new guidelines suggest a stratification of relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL based on the time to relapse. For transplant-eligible patients, autologous stem cell transplant remains the preferred option when the patient relapses after 12 months from diagnosis, while anti-CD19 CART-cell therapy is the current preferred choice for high-risk DLBCL, defined as primary refractory or relapse ≤ 12 month. For transplant-ineligible or CAR T-cell therapy-ineligible patients, the therapeutic arsenal historically lacked effective options. However, new therapeutic options, including polatuzumab vedotin combined with bendamustine-rituximab and tafasitamab with lenalidomide, have been recently approved, and novel agents such as loncastuximab tesirine, selinexor, anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies have shown promising efficacy and manageable safety in this setting offering new hope to patients in this challenging scenario.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in hematology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2023.12.001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2023.12.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在免疫化疗时代,约有60%-70%的弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者在接受基于利妥昔单抗的一线免疫化疗后病情得到缓解。然而,30%-40%的患者在对一线治疗产生初步反应后复发,其中20%-50%的患者为难治性或早期复发。由于新的治疗药物或其组合最近获得批准,DLBCL的二线治疗算法最近也发生了变化。新指南建议根据复发时间对复发/难治(R/R)DLBCL进行分层。对于符合移植条件的患者,自体干细胞移植仍是患者在确诊12个月后复发的首选方案,而抗CD19 CART细胞疗法则是目前高危DLBCL的首选方案,高危DLBCL的定义是原发性难治或复发≤12个月。对于不符合移植条件或不符合CAR T细胞疗法条件的患者,治疗手段历来缺乏有效的选择。然而,新的治疗方案,包括波拉珠单抗维多汀联合苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗和他法西他单抗联合来那度胺,最近已获得批准,而且长卡素单抗泰西林、西利奈索、抗CD19 CAR T细胞疗法和双特异性抗体等新型药物在这种情况下显示出了良好的疗效和可控的安全性,为面临这一挑战的患者带来了新的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Second Line Treatment of DLBCL: Evolution of Options

In the era of immunochemotherapy, approximately 60%–70% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients achieve remission with first-line rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy. However, 30-40% relapse after initial response to first line therapy and, out of them, 20% to 50% are refractory or experience early relapse. The second-line therapy algorithm for DLBCL has recently evolved, thanks to the recent approval of new therapeutic agents or their combinations. The new guidelines suggest a stratification of relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL based on the time to relapse. For transplant-eligible patients, autologous stem cell transplant remains the preferred option when the patient relapses after 12 months from diagnosis, while anti-CD19 CART-cell therapy is the current preferred choice for high-risk DLBCL, defined as primary refractory or relapse ≤ 12 month. For transplant-ineligible or CAR T-cell therapy-ineligible patients, the therapeutic arsenal historically lacked effective options. However, new therapeutic options, including polatuzumab vedotin combined with bendamustine-rituximab and tafasitamab with lenalidomide, have been recently approved, and novel agents such as loncastuximab tesirine, selinexor, anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies have shown promising efficacy and manageable safety in this setting offering new hope to patients in this challenging scenario.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in hematology
Seminars in hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.80%
发文量
30
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Hematology aims to present subjects of current importance in clinical hematology, including related areas of oncology, hematopathology, and blood banking. The journal''s unique issue structure allows for a multi-faceted overview of a single topic via a curated selection of review articles, while also offering a variety of articles that present dynamic and front-line material immediately influencing the field. Seminars in Hematology is devoted to making the important and current work accessible, comprehensible, and valuable to the practicing physician, young investigator, clinical practitioners, and internists/paediatricians with strong interests in blood diseases. Seminars in Hematology publishes original research, reviews, short communications and mini- reviews.
期刊最新文献
Infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Fast and Furious: changing gears on the road to cure with chimeric antigen receptor T cells in multiple myeloma Tuning CAR T-cell therapies for efficacy and reduced toxicity License for a CAR T: Examining Patient Eligibility The role of autologous stem-cell transplantation in classical Hodgkin lymphoma in the modern era.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1