Ellen M McCabe, Beth E Jameson, Laura Grunin, Gary Yu
{"title":"纽约慢性病管理和校本医疗中心:2020 年学校健康概况调查》。","authors":"Ellen M McCabe, Beth E Jameson, Laura Grunin, Gary Yu","doi":"10.1177/15271544231220360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>School-based health centers (SBHCs) are associated with numerous positive aspects of student health services. Many schools in the United States (US) do not have transparent policies on chronic health condition (CHC) management. Of particular concern is the underreporting of the delivery of health services in U.S. schools concerning CHC management and its relationship with the presence or absence of a SBHC. Data from the 2020 School Health Profiles (SHP) Survey were examined in New York public secondary schools. Specific health services were reviewed, together with the presence or absence of a SBHC, including daily medication administration, stock rescue medication, case management services, community partners, chronic disease-specific education, and assurance that students with CHCs were enrolled in an insurance program. A significantly greater proportion of schools with a SBHC compared with schools without a SBHC provided: (1) daily medication administration (92.9% vs. 86.5%; <i>p </i>< .001), (2) stock or rescue medication (84.9% vs. 77.4%; <i>p </i>< .001), (3) case management services (83.1% vs. 67.2%; <i>p </i>< .001), (4) disease-specific education for families (63.1% vs. 57.2%; <i>p</i> = .022), (5) student and family connection to community health services (84.2% vs. 76.5%; <i>p </i>< .001), and (6) ensured that a protocol existed whereby students with a CHC were enrolled in an insurance plan if eligible (79.6% vs. 66.8%; <i>p </i>< .001). Findings suggest that data on a national scale include essential facts for states to consider concerning school health policies and practices. Additional research should examine the intricacy of elements connected with school-based health care to understand better the care provided to children with CHCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":53177,"journal":{"name":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":"36-46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic Health Condition Management and School-Based Health Centers in New York: Findings From the 2020 School Health Profiles Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen M McCabe, Beth E Jameson, Laura Grunin, Gary Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15271544231220360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>School-based health centers (SBHCs) are associated with numerous positive aspects of student health services. Many schools in the United States (US) do not have transparent policies on chronic health condition (CHC) management. Of particular concern is the underreporting of the delivery of health services in U.S. schools concerning CHC management and its relationship with the presence or absence of a SBHC. Data from the 2020 School Health Profiles (SHP) Survey were examined in New York public secondary schools. Specific health services were reviewed, together with the presence or absence of a SBHC, including daily medication administration, stock rescue medication, case management services, community partners, chronic disease-specific education, and assurance that students with CHCs were enrolled in an insurance program. A significantly greater proportion of schools with a SBHC compared with schools without a SBHC provided: (1) daily medication administration (92.9% vs. 86.5%; <i>p </i>< .001), (2) stock or rescue medication (84.9% vs. 77.4%; <i>p </i>< .001), (3) case management services (83.1% vs. 67.2%; <i>p </i>< .001), (4) disease-specific education for families (63.1% vs. 57.2%; <i>p</i> = .022), (5) student and family connection to community health services (84.2% vs. 76.5%; <i>p </i>< .001), and (6) ensured that a protocol existed whereby students with a CHC were enrolled in an insurance plan if eligible (79.6% vs. 66.8%; <i>p </i>< .001). Findings suggest that data on a national scale include essential facts for states to consider concerning school health policies and practices. Additional research should examine the intricacy of elements connected with school-based health care to understand better the care provided to children with CHCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"36-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544231220360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15271544231220360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
校本健康中心(SBHC)与学生健康服务的许多积极方面有关。美国的许多学校在慢性病(CHC)管理方面的政策并不透明。尤其令人担忧的是,美国学校在慢性病管理及其与是否有 SBHC 的关系方面的健康服务提供情况报告不足。我们研究了纽约公立中学 2020 年学校健康概况(SHP)调查的数据。我们对具体的健康服务以及是否存在 SBHC 进行了审查,包括日常药物管理、库存抢救药物、个案管理服务、社区合作伙伴、慢性病特定教育,以及是否保证患有慢性病的学生参加了保险计划。与没有 SBHC 的学校相比,有 SBHC 的学校提供以下服务的比例明显更高:(1)日常药物管理(92.9% 对 86.5%;p p p p = .022);(5)学生和家庭与社区卫生服务机构的联系(84.2% 对 76.5%;p p p = .022);(6)学生和家庭与社区卫生服务机构的联系(84.2% 对 76.5%;p p p = .022)。
Chronic Health Condition Management and School-Based Health Centers in New York: Findings From the 2020 School Health Profiles Survey.
School-based health centers (SBHCs) are associated with numerous positive aspects of student health services. Many schools in the United States (US) do not have transparent policies on chronic health condition (CHC) management. Of particular concern is the underreporting of the delivery of health services in U.S. schools concerning CHC management and its relationship with the presence or absence of a SBHC. Data from the 2020 School Health Profiles (SHP) Survey were examined in New York public secondary schools. Specific health services were reviewed, together with the presence or absence of a SBHC, including daily medication administration, stock rescue medication, case management services, community partners, chronic disease-specific education, and assurance that students with CHCs were enrolled in an insurance program. A significantly greater proportion of schools with a SBHC compared with schools without a SBHC provided: (1) daily medication administration (92.9% vs. 86.5%; p < .001), (2) stock or rescue medication (84.9% vs. 77.4%; p < .001), (3) case management services (83.1% vs. 67.2%; p < .001), (4) disease-specific education for families (63.1% vs. 57.2%; p = .022), (5) student and family connection to community health services (84.2% vs. 76.5%; p < .001), and (6) ensured that a protocol existed whereby students with a CHC were enrolled in an insurance plan if eligible (79.6% vs. 66.8%; p < .001). Findings suggest that data on a national scale include essential facts for states to consider concerning school health policies and practices. Additional research should examine the intricacy of elements connected with school-based health care to understand better the care provided to children with CHCs.
期刊介绍:
Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that explores the multiple relationships between nursing and health policy. It serves as a major source of data-based study, policy analysis and discussion on timely, relevant policy issues for nurses in a broad variety of roles and settings, and for others outside of nursing who are interested in nursing-related policy issues.